Constraints on partial VP-fronting

Syntax

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 127-164

  Landau, Idan ^a  

^a BEN GURION UNIVERSITY OF THE NEGEV   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34547830984     PISSN: 13680005     EISSN: 14679612     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9612.2007.00099.x     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. ABELS, K. 2001. The predicate cleft construction in Russian. In Proceedings of FASL 9, ed. S. FRANKS, T. H. KING & M. YADROFF, 1-18. Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Publications.
2. BALTIN, M. 2003. The interaction of ellipsis and binding: Implications for the sequencing of Principle A. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 31: 215-246.
3. BALTIN, M. 2006. The non-unity of VP-preposing. Language 82: 734-766.
4. BIANCHI, V. 1995. Consequences of antisymmetry for the syntax of headed relative clauses. Ph.D. dissertation, Scoula Normale Superiore, Pisa.
5. BOBALJIK, J. D. 2002. A-chains at the PF-interface: Copies and "covert" movement. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 20: 197-267.
6. BOŠKOVIĆ, Ž. 2001. On the nature of the syntax-phonology interface: Cliticization and related phenomena. Oxford: Elsevier.
7. CABLE, S. 2003. The Yiddish predicate cleft: A base-generation analysis. Ms., MIT, Cambridge, MA.
8. CHOMSKY, N. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
9. CHOMSKY, N. 2000. Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik, ed. R. MARTIN, D. MICHELS & J. URIAGEREKA, 89-155. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10. CHOMSKY, N. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Ken Hale: A life in language, ed. M. KENSTOWICZ, 1-52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
11. den BESTEN, H. & G. WEBELHUTH. 1990. Stranding. In Scrambling and barriers, ed. G. GREWENDORF & W. STERNEFELD, 77-92. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
12. EPSTEIN, S. D., E. GROAT, R. KAWASHIMA & H. KITAHARA. 1998. A derivational approach to syntactic relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
13. FANSELOW, G. 2002. Against remnant VP-movement. In Dimensions of movement: From features to remnants, ed. A. ALEXIADOU, E. ANAGNOSTOPOULOU, S. BARBIERS & H.-M. GAERTNER, 91-125. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
14. Fanselow, G. & D. Ćavar. 2002. Distributed deletion. In Theoretical approaches to universals, ed. A. ALEXIADOU, 65-107. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
15. FOX, D. 2000. Economy and semantic interpretation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
16. FOX, D. 2002. Antecedent-contained deletion and the copy theory of movement. Linguistic Inquiry 33: 63-96.
17. FOX, D. & J. NISSENBAUM. 1999. Extraposition and scope: A case for overt QR. In Proceedings of WCCFL 18, ed. S. BIRD, A. CARNIE, J. H. HAUGEN & P. NORQUEST, 132-144. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
18. FRANKS, S. 1999. Optimality theory and clitics at PF. In Proceedings of FASL 7, ed. K. DZIWIREK, H. COATS & C. M. VAKARELIYSKA, 101-116. Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Publications.
19. FREIDIN, R. 1986. Fundamental issues in the theory of binding. In Studies in the acquisition of anaphora, ed. B. LUST, 151-188. Dordrecht: Reidel.
20. GREWENDORF, G. & J. SABEL 1994. Long scrambling and incorporation. Linguistic Inquiry 25: 263-308.
21. GRIMSHAW, J. 1990. Argument structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
22. HEYCOCK, C. 1995. Asymmetries in reconstruction. Linguistic Inquiry 26: 547-570.
23. HINTERHÖLZL, R. 2002. Remnant movement and partial deletion. In Dimensions of movement: From features to remnants, ed. A. ALEXIADOU, E. ANAGNOSTOPOULOU, S. BARBIERS & H.-M. GAERTNER, 127-149. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
24. HOLMBERG, A. 1999. Remarks on Holmberg's generalization. Studia Linguistica 53: 1-39.
25. HUANG, C.-T. J. 1993. Reconstruction and the structure of VP: Some theoretical consequences. Linguistic Inquiry 24: 103-138.
26. JOHNSON, K. 2001. What VP-ellipsis can do, and what it can't, but not why. In The handbook of contemporary syntactic theory, ed. M. BALTIN & C. COLLINS, 439-479. Oxford: Blackwell.
27. KOOPMAN, H. 1984. The syntax of verbs: From verb movement rules in the Kru languages to Universal Grammar. Dordrecht: Foris.
28. KOOPMAN, H. 1997. Unifying predicate cleft constructions. In Proceedings of BLS 23: Special session on syntax and semantics in Africa, ed. K. MOORE, 000-000. Berkeley: University of California.
29. KUNO, S. 1997. Binding theory and the Minimalist Program. Ms., Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
30. LANDAU, I. 2006. Chain resolution in Hebrew V(P)-fronting. Syntax 9: 32-66.
31. LARSON, R. 2004. Sentence-final adverbs and "scope." In Proceedings of NELS 34, ed. M. WOLF & K. MOULTON, 23-43. Amherst, MA: GLSA Publications.
32. LASNIK, H. 2003. Minimalist investigations in linguistic theory. London: Routledge.
33. LEBEAUX, D. 1988. Language acquisition and the form of the grammar. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
34. LECHNER, W. 2002. Some comments on Phillips 2002. Ms., Institute of General and Theoretical Linguistics, University of Tübingen.
35. LECHNER, W. 2003. Phrase structure paradoxes, movement, and ellipsis. In The interfaces: Deriving and interpreting omitted structures, ed. K. SCHWABE & S. WINKLER, 187-203. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
36. MANFREDI, V. 1993. Verb Focus in the typology of Kwa/Kru and Haitian. In Focus and grammatical relations in creole languages, ed. F. BYRNE & D. WINFORD, 3-51. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
37. Mc CARTHY, C. 2004. Reconstruction and Condition C: Some unexpected symmetries. McGill Working Papers in Linguistics 18: 25-44.
38. MÜLLER, G. 1998. Incomplete category fronting: A derivational approach to remnant movement in German. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
39. MÜLLER, G. 2002. Two types of remnant movement. In Dimensions of movement: From features to remnants, ed. A. ALEXIADOU, E. ANAGNOSTOPOULOU, S. BARBIERS & H.-M. GAERTNER, 209-241. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
40. PESETSKY, D. 1995. Zero syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
41. PESETSKY, D. 2000. Phrasal movement and its kin. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
42. PHILLIPS, C. 1996. Order and structure. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
43. PHILLIPS, C. 1998. Linear order and constituency. Ms., University of Delaware, Newark.
44. PHILLIPS, C. 2002. Constituency in deletion and movement: Remarks on Lechner 2001. Ms., University of Maryland, College Park.
45. PHILLIPS, C. 2003. Linear order and constituency. Linguistic Inquiry 34: 37-90.
46. POSTAL, P. 1993. Remarks on weak crossover effects. Linguistic Inquiry 24: 539-556.
47. SAFIR, K. 1999. Vehicle change and reconstruction in A′-chains. Linguistic Inquiry 30: 587-620.
48. STOWELL, T. 1981. Origins of phrase structure. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
49. SAUERLAND, U. 1998. The meaning of chains. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
50. TAKANO, Y. 1995. Predicate fronting and internal subjects. Linguistic Inquiry 26: 327-340.
51. TAKANO, Y. 2000. Illicit remnant movement: An argument for feature-driven movement. Linguistic Inquiry 31: 141-156.
52. van RIEMSDIJK, H. 1989. Movement and regeneration. In Dialectal variation and the theory of grammar, ed. P. BENINCÁ, 105-136. Dordrecht: Foris.