Gene selection via the BAHSIC family of algorithms

Bioinformatics

Volumn 23, Issue 13, 2007, Pages

  Song, Le ^a,b   Bedo, Justin ^a   Borgwardt, Karsten M ^c   Gretton, Arthur ^d   Smola, Alex ^a  

^a AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^d MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL CYBERNETICS   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYTICAL ERROR; CLASSIFICATION; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; GENE EXPRESSION; GENETIC ALGORITHM; GENETIC SELECTION; KERNEL METHOD; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MOLECULAR PHYLOGENY; NONLINEAR SYSTEM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL;

EID: 34547830852     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 13674811     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm216     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (45)

1. Alizadeh, A. et al. (2000) Distinct types of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma identified by gene expression profiling. Nature, 403 503-511.
2. Alon, U. et al. (1999) Broad patterns of gene expression revealed by clustering analysis of tumor and normal colon tissues probed by oligonucleotide arrays. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 96, 6745-6750.
3. Baker, C. (1973) Joint measures and cross-covariance operators. Trans. Am. Math. Soc., 186, 273-289.
4. Bedo, J. et al. (2006) An efficient alternative to svm based recursive feature elimination with applications in natural language processing and bioinformatics. In Artificial Intelligence, LNCS 4304, 170-180.
5. Beer, D.G. et al. (2002) Gene-expression profiles predict survival of patients with lung adenocarcinoma. Nat. Med., 8, 816-824.
6. Berchuck, A. et al. (2005) Patterns of gene expression that characterize long-term survival in advanced stage serous ovarian cancers. Clin. Cancer Res., 11, 3686-3696.
7. Bhattacharjee, A. et al. (2001) Classification of human lung carcinomas by mRNA expression profiling reveals distinct adenocarcinoma subclasses. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 98, 13790-13795.
8. Brown, M. et al. (2000) Knowledge-based analysis of microarray gene expression data by using support vector machines. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 97, 262-267.
9. Bullinger, L. et al. (2004) Use of gene-expression profiling to identify prognostic subclasses in adult acute myeloid leukemia. N. Engl. J. Med., 350, 1605-1616.
10. Candes, E. and Tao, T. (2005) Decoding by linear programming. IEEE Trans. Info Theory, 51, 4203-4215.
11. Cover, T.M. and Thomas, J.A. (1991) Elements of Information Theory John Wiley and Sons, New York.
12. Dhanasekaran, S.M. et al. (2001) Delineation of prognostic biomarkers in prostate cancer. Nature, 412, 822-826.
13. Ein-Dor, L. et al. (2006) Thousands of samples are needed to generate a robust gene list for predicting outcome in cancer. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 103, 5923-5928.
14. Fan, J. and Li, R. (2001) Variable selection via nonconeave penalized likelihood an its oracle properties. J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 96 1348-1360.
15. Feuerverger, A. (1993) A consistent test for bivariate dependence. Int. Stat. Rev., 61, 419-433.
16. Fukuimzu, K. et al. (2004) Dimensionality reduction for supervised learning with reproducing kernel hilbert spaces. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 5, 73-99.
17. Gärtner, T. et al. (2003) On graph kernels: Hardness results and efficient alternatives. In Schölkopf B. and Warmuth, M.K. (eds) Proceedings of Annual Conference Computational Learning Theory, Springer, pp 129-143.
18. Gohib, T.R. et al. (1999) Molecular classification of cancer: Class discovery and class prediction by gene expression monitoring. Science, 286, 531-537.
19. Gretton, A. et al. (2005) Measuring statistical dependence with Hilbert-Schmidt norms. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Algorithmic Learning Theory, pp 63-78.
20. Gruvberger, S. et al. (2001) Estrogen receptor status in breast cancer is associated with remarkably distinct gene expression patterns. Cancer Res., 61, 5979-5984.
21. Guyon, I. et al. (2002) Gene selection for cancer classification using support vector machines. Mach. Learn., 46, 389-422.
22. Hastie, T. et al. (2001) The Elements of Statistical Learning Springer, New York.
23. Iizuka, N. et al. (2003) Oligonucleotide microarray for prediction of early intrahepatic recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after curative resection. Lancet, 361, 923-929.
24. Li, F. and Yang, Y. (2005) Analysis of recursive gene selection approaches from microarray data. Bioinformatics, 21, 3741-3747.
25. Li, W. (2006) Bibliography on microarray data analysis.
26. Lodhi, H. et al. (2002) Text classification using string kernels. J. Mach. Learn. Res., 2, 419-444.
27. Rosenwald, A. et al. (2002) The use of molecular profiling to predict survival after chemotherapy for diffuse large-B-cell lymphoma. N. Engl. J. Med., 346, 1937-1947.
28. Schölkopf, B. and Smola, A. (2002) Learning with Kernels. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
29. Schölkopf, B. et al. (2004) Kernel Methods in Computational Biology. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
30. Smyth, G. (2004) Linear models and empirical bayes methods for assessing differential expressionin microarray experiments. Stat. Appl. Genet. Mol. Biol., 3.
31. Steinwart, I. (2002) On the influence of the kernel on the consistency of support vector machines. J. Mach. Learn. Res., 2, 67-93.
32. Stolovitzky, G. (2003) Gene selection in microarray data: The elephant, the blind men and our algorithms. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol., 13 370-376.
33. Tibshirani, R. (1994) Regression selection and shrinkage via the lasso. Technical report, Department of Statistics, University of Toronto. ftp://utstat.toronto.edu/pub/tibs/lasso.ps
34. Tibshirani, R. et al. (2002) Diagnosis of multiple cancer types by shrunken centroids of gene expression. In National Academy of Sciences. vol. 99, pp. 6567-6572.
35. Tibshirani, R. et al. (2003) Class prediction by nearest shrunken centrnids, with applicaitons to DNA microarrays. Stat. Sci., 18 104-117.
36. Tusher, V.G. et al. (2001) Significance analysis of microarrays applied to the ionizing radiation response. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 5116-5121.
37. Valk, P.J. et al. (2004) Prognostically useful gene-expression profiles in acute myeloid leukemia. N. Engl. J. Med., 350, 1617-1628.
38. van de Vijver, M.J. et al. (2002) A gene-expression signature as a predictor of survival in breast cancer. N. Engl. J. Med., 247 1999-2009.
39. van't Veer, L.J. et al. (2002) Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancer. Nature, 415, 530-536.
40. Walnwright, M. (2006) Sharp thresholds for noisy and high-dimensional recovery of sparsity. Technical report, Department of Statistics, UC Berkeley.
41. Wang, Y. et al. (2005) Gene-expression profiles to predict distant metastasis of lymph-node-negative primary breast cancer. Lancet, 365, 671-679.
42. Warnat, P. et al. (2005) Cross-platform analysis of cancer microarray data improves gene expression based classification of phenotypes. BMC Bioinformatics, 6, 265.
43. Welsh, J.B. et al. (2001) Analysis of gene expression identifies candidate markers and pharmacological targets in prostate cancer. Cancer Res., 61, 5974-5978.
44. West, M. et al. (2001) Predicting the clinical status of human breast cancer by using gene expression profiles. PNAS, 98.
45. Zaffalon, M. and Hutter, M. (2002) Robust feature selection using distributions of mutual information. In Darwiche, A. and Friedman, N. (eds), Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI-2002), Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA, pp. 577-584.