Genetic Diversity and Interrelationship Among Mulberry Genotypes

Journal of Genetics and Genomics

Volumn 34, Issue 8, 2007, Pages 691-697

  Banerjee, Rita ^a   Roychowdhuri, Sukhen ^a   Sau, Haradhan ^a   Das, Bimal Kumar ^a   Ghosh, Pannalal ^a   Saratchandra, Beera ^a  

^a Central Sericultural Research and Training Institute   (India)

Author keywords

correlation; genetic divergence; morphometric traits; mulberry; path analysis

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CULTIVAR; GENE SEQUENCE; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENETIC CORRELATION; GENETIC IMPROVEMENT; GENETIC RESOURCE; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETIC TRAIT; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENOTYPE; INDIA; MULBERRY; NONHUMAN; PATH ANALYSIS; PLANT GENETICS; PLANT LEAF; PLANT YIELD; SPECIES COMPARISON;

CLUSTER ANALYSIS; GENES, PLANT; GENETIC VARIATION; GENOTYPE; MORUS; PHENOTYPE;

MORUS (PLANT);

EID: 34547828306     PISSN: 16738527     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1673-8527(07)60078-2     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Gilpin M., and Soule M. Minimum viable population: processes of species extinction. In: Soule M. (Ed). Conservation biology : the science of scarcity and diversity (1986), Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA 19-34
2. Barrett S., and Kohn J. Genetic and evolutionary consequences of small population size in plants: implications for conservation. In: Falk D., and Holsinger K. (Eds). Genetics and conservation of rare plants (1991), Oxford University Press, New York 3-30
3. Ellstrand N., and Elam D. Population genetic consequences of small population size: implication for plant conservation. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 24 (1993) 217-242
4. Hamrick J., and Godt M. Conservation genetics of endemic plant species. In: Avise J., and Hamrick J. (Eds). Conservation genetics: case histories from nature (1996), Chapman and Hall, London 281-304
5. Karron J. Genetic consequences of different patterns of distribution and abundance. In: Kunin W., and Gaston K. (Eds). The biology of rarity: causes and consequences of rare common differences (1997), Chapman and Hall, London 174-189
6. Lande R. Extinction risks from anthropogenic, ecological, and genetic factors. In: Landweber L., and Dobson A. (Eds). Genetics and the extinction of species: DNA and the conservation of biodiversity (1999), Princeton University Press, NJ 1-22
7. Monaghan J., Snape J., Chojecki A., and Kettlewell P. The use of grain protein deviation for identifying wheat cultivars with high grain protein concentration and yield. Euphytica 122 (2001) 309-317
8. Patil D., Thiyagarajan K., and Puspha K. Combining ability for parents and yield contributing traits in two line hybrids rice (Oryza sativa L.). Crop Res 25 (2003) 520-524
9. Medici L., Percira M., and Lea P. The identification of maize lines with contrasting responses to applied nitrogen. J Plant Nutr 28 (2005) 903-915
10. Geleta L., and Labuschagne M. Hybrid performance for yield and other characteristics in peppers (Capsicum annum L.). J of Agri Sci 142 (2004) 411-419
11. Zhao W., Miao X., Zang B., Zhang L., Pan Y., and Huang Y. Construction of fingerprinting and genetic diversity of mulberry cultivars in China by ISSR markers. Acta Genet Sin 33 (2006) 851-860
12. Hunter B. Science based identification of plant genetic material. CSSA. Intellectual property rights: Protection of plant materials. Special Publication 21 (1993) 93-99
13. Escribano M., Santalla M., Casquero P., and De Ron A. Pattern of genetic diversity in landraces of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) from Gilica. Plant Breed 117 (1998) 49-56
14. Tikadar A. Studies on heritabilities, genetic parameters and response to selection in mulberry. Bull Seric Res 8 (1997) 19-22
15. Masilamani S., and Camle C. Genetic variation, heritability, correlation and path analysis in mulberry (Morus spp.). Madras Agric J 85 (1998) 41-44
16. Tikadar A., and Roy B. Genetic variability and character association in mulberry (Morus spp.). Indian J Forestry 22 (1999) 26-29
17. Masilamani S., Reddy A., Sarkar A., Sreenivas B., and Camle C. Heritability and genetic advance of quantitative traits in mulberry (Morus spp.). Indian J Seric 39 (2000) 16-20
18. Sau H., Sahu P., Yadav B., and Saratchandra B. Evaluation of mulberry (Morus spp.) genetic resources-Sprouting, survival and rooting ability. J Environ Res 3 (1995) 11-13
19. Sujathamma P., and Dandin S. Evaluation of mulberry (Morus spp.) genotypes for propagation parameters. Indian J Seric 37 (1998) 133-136
20. Singh M., and Banerjee S. Path analysis of yield components in Rice. Kasetsart J (Nat Sci) 21 (1986) 876-892
21. Sahu P., Yadav B., and Saratchandra B. Evaluation of yield component in mulberry germplasm varieties. Acta Bot 23 (1995) 191-195
22. Singhvi N., Chakraborty S., Singhal B., Rekha M., Sarkar A., and Datta R. Character association of leaf yield traits in mulberry. Bull Sericult Res 9 (1998) 83-84
23. Sujatamma P., and Dandin S. Evaluation of mulberry (Morus spp.) genotypes for yield under Rayalseema conditions of Andhra Pradesh. Indian J Seric 37 (1998) 13-16
24. Sarkar A. Improvement in mulberry-Current status and future strategies. National conference on strategies for Sericulture Research and Development. Central Sericultural Research and Training Institute, Mysore, 2000, 2-11.
25. Rajan M., and Sarkar A. Genetic divergence in some Indian and Exotic mulberry genotypes. Bull Seric Res 9 (1998) 25-29
26. Suryanarayana N., Ram Rao D., and Reddy M. Genetic divergence in mulberry (Morus spp.). Indian J Seric 41 (2002) 2-11
27. Tikadar A., Thangavelu K., and Rao A. Characterization and evaluation of mulberry (Morus spp.) germplasm. Indian J Seric 43 (2004) 106-110