Transgression wrongfulness outweighs its harmfulness as a determinant of sentence severity

Law and Human Behavior

Volumn 31, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 319-335

  Alter, Adam L ^a   Kernochan, Julia ^b   Darley, John M ^a  

^a PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Criminal law; Psychology; Sentencing

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CRIME; CRIMINAL LAW; DEATH; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; OFFENDER; PUNISHMENT; THEORY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CRIME; DATA COLLECTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PUNISHMENT; UNITED STATES;

EID: 34547812719     PISSN: 01477307     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10979-006-9060-x     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Alldridge, P. (1990). The doctrine of innocent agency. Criminal Law Forum, 2, 45-83.
2. Ames, J. B. (1908). Law and morals. Harvard Law Review, 22, 97.
3. Atkins v. Virginia, 536 U.S. 304, 319 (2002).
4. Blakely v. Washington 542 U.S. 296 (2004).
5. Blum-West, S. (1985). The seriousness of a crime: A study of popular morality. Deviant Behavior, 6, 83-98.
6. Bowers, W. J., Steiner, B. D., & Antonio, M. E. (2003). The capital sentencing decision: Guided discretion, reasoned moral judgment, or legal fiction. In J. R. Acker, R. M. Bohm, & C. S. Lanier (Ed.), America's experiment with capital punishment: Reflections on the past, present, and future of the ultimate penal sanction, 2nd edn. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
7. Carlsmith, K. M., Darley, J. M., & Robinson, P. H. (2002). Why do we punish? Deterrence and just deserts as motives for punishment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 284-299.
8. Crain, W. C. (1985). Theories of development. New York: Prentice-Hall.
9. Cullen, F., Link, B., & Polanzi, C. (1982). The seriousness of crime revisited: Have attitudes toward white-collar crime changed? Criminology, 20, 83-102.
10. Erikson, M., & Gibbs, J. (1979). On the perceived severity of legal penalties. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 70, 102-116.
11. Garvey, S. F. (1998). Aggravation and mitigation in capital cases: What do jurors think? Columbia Law Review, 98, 1538-1576.
12. Gescheider, G., Catlin, E., & Fontana, A. (1982). Psychophysical measurement of the judged seriousness of crimes and severity of punishments. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 19, 275-278.
13. Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U.S. 153 (1976).
14. Hancock, S. F. Jr (2004). Meeting the needs: Fairness, morality, creativity and common sense. The hugh jones memorial lecture. Albany Law Review, 68, 81-96.
15. Kohlberg, L., & Turiel, E. (1971). Moral development and moral education. In G. Lesser (Ed.), Psychology and educational practice (pp. 410-465). New York: Scott Foresman.
16. McCleary, R., O'Neil, M., Epperlein, T., Jones, C., & Gray, R. (1981). Effects of legal education and work experience on perceptions of crime seriousness. Social Problems, 28, 276-289.
17. Morissette v. United States, 342 U.S. 246 (1952).
18. Nadler, J. (2005). Flouting the law. Texas Law Journal, 83, 1399-1441.
19. Packer, H. L. (1968). The limits of the criminal sanction. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
20. Penry v. Lynaugh, 492 U.S. 302 (1989).
21. Rest, J. R., Narvaez, D., Thoma, S. J., & Bebeau, M. J. (2000). A neo-Kohlbergian approach to morality research. Journal of Moral Education, 29, 381-395.
22. Ring v. Arizona, 536 U.S. 584 (2002).
23. Robinson, P. H., & Darley, J. M. (1997). The utility of desert. Northwestern University Law Review, 91, 453-499.
24. Roper v. Simmons, 125 S.Ct. 1183 (2005).
25. Rosenmerkel, S. P. (2001). Wrongfulness and harmfulness as components of seriousness of white-collar offenses. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 17, 308-327.
26. Rossi, P., Waite, W., Bose, C., & Berk, R. (1974). The seriousness of crimes: Normative structure and individual differences. American Sociological Review, 39, 224-237.
27. Sellin, T., & Wolfgang, M. (1964). The measurement of delinquency. New York, NY: John Wiley.
28. Sherman, R., & Dowdle, M. (1974). Perception of crime and punishment: Multidimensional scaling analysis. Social Science Research, 3, 109-126.
29. United States v. Barker, 514 F.2d 208 (D.C. Cir. 1975).
30. United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005).
31. Warr, M. (1989). What is the perceived seriousness of crimes? Criminology, 27, 795-821.
32. Ziemer, D. (2005, April 13). 7th Circuit asks courts to impose sentences that reflect the offense. Kansas City Daily Record. News p. 1.