Axiomatizing collective judgment sets in a minimal logical language

Synthese

Volumn 158, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 233-250

  Pauly, Marc ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Judgment aggregation; Modal logic

Indexed keywords

EID: 34547809869     PISSN: 00397857     EISSN: 15730964     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11229-006-9079-z     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Anthony, M. (2003). Boolean functions and artificial neural networks. CDAM Research Report LSE-CDAM-2003-01, London School of Economics.
2. Chellas B. (1980). Modal logic-An introduction. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
3. Dietrich, F., & List, C. Arrow's theorem in judgment aggregation. Social Choice and Welfare (forthcoming).
4. List C., Pettit P. (2002). Aggregating sets of judgements: An impossibility result. Economics and Philosophy 18, 89-110
5. May K.O. (1952). A set of independent necessary and sufficient conditions for simple majority decision. Econometrica 20, 680-684
6. Pacuit, E., & Salame, S. (2004). Majority logic. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR) (pp. 598-605).
7. Pauly, M., & van Hees, M. (2006) Logical constraints on judgement aggregation. Journal of Philosophical Logic 35(6), 569-585.
8. Taylor A., Zwicker W. (1992). A characterization of weighted voting. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society 115(4): 1089-1094
9. Taylor A., Zwicker W. (1999). Simple games: Desirability relations, trading, pseudoweightings. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ