18FDG-PET: A new diagnostic approach in hip prosthesis infection;La 18FDG-PET: Una nueva aproximación diagnóstica en la infección protésica de cadera

Revista Espanola de Medicina Nuclear

Volumn 26, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 208-220

  Garcia Barrecheguren E ^a,b   Rodriguez Fraile M ^a   Toledo Santana, G ^a   Valenti Nin J R ^a   Richter Echevarria J A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY CLINIC OF NAVARRA   (Spain)

^b NONE   (Spain)

Author keywords

Failed prostheses replacements; FDG PET; Infection; Septic and aseptic loosening

Indexed keywords

FLUORODEOXYGLUCOSE F 18; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT; FLUORINE; RADIOPHARMACEUTICAL AGENT;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ASPIRATION; BONE RADIOGRAPHY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL FEATURE; FEMALE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; LABORATORY TEST; MALE; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; PROSTHESIS INFECTION; SCINTISCANNING; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; BIOPSY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EVALUATION; HIP PROSTHESIS; INFECTION; MICROBIOLOGICAL EXAMINATION; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; VALIDATION STUDY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BACTERIOLOGICAL TECHNIQUES; BIOPSY; FEMALE; FLUORINE RADIOISOTOPES; FLUORODEOXYGLUCOSE F18; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTHESIS-RELATED INFECTIONS; RADIOPHARMACEUTICALS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 34547808248     PISSN: 02126982     EISSN: 1578200X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1157/13107972     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Bryan RS, Rand JA. Revision total Knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 1982;170:116-22.
2. Laskin RS. The painful knee. Orthopedics. 1999;22:869-70.
3. Marín M, Montserrat F. Prótesis total de rodilla dolorosa. In: Herrera A, editor. Actualizaciones en Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología. Actualizaciones SECOT 2. Barcelona: Masson S.A.; 2001. p. 183-91.
4. Windsor RE, Insall JN, Urs WK, Miller DV, Brause BD. Two stage reimplantion for the salvage of total knee arthroplasty complicated by infection: Further follow-up and refinement of indications. J Bone Joint Surg. 1990;72A:272-8.
5. Windsor RE, Scuderi GR, Moran MC, Insall JM. Mechanisms of failure of the femoral and tibial components in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 1989:248:15-20.
6. Gristina AG, Kolkin J. Currents concepts review of total joint replacement and sepsis. J Bone Joint Surg. 1983;65A:128-34.
7. Hanssen AD, Rand JA. Evaluation and treatment of infection at the site of a total hip or knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg. 1998;80A:910-21.
8. McDonald DJ, Fitzgerald RH, Ilstrup DM. Two-stage reconstruction of a total hip arthroplasty because of infection. J Joint Bone Surg. 1989;71A:828-34.
9. Cuckler JM, Star AM, Alavi A, Noto RB. Diagnosis and management of the infected total joint arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am. 1991;22:523-30.
10. Diagnosing prosthetic joint infection. May 1999;63-5. Available in: htpp://www.jr2.ox.ac.uk:80/Bandolier/band63/b63-5.htm
11. Ducheyne P, Kagan A, Lacey JA. Failure of total knee arthroplasty due loosening and deformation of tibial component. J Bone Joint Surg. 1978;60A:384-91.
12. Duff GP, Lachiewicz PF, Kelley SS. Aspiration of the knee before revision arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 1996;331:128-34.
13. Engh GA, Dwyer KA, Hanes CK. Polyethylene wear of metalbacked tibial components in total and unicompartmental knee prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg. 1992;74B:9-17.
14. Tsukayama DT, Estrada R, Gustilo RB. Infection after total hip arthroplasty. A study of the treatment of 106 infections. J Bone Joint Surg. 1996;78A:512-23.
15. Spanghel MJ, Masri BA, O'Connell JX, Duncan CP. Prospective analysis of preoperative and intraoperative investigations for the diagnosis of infection at the sites of two hundred and two revision total hip arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg. 1999;81A:672-83.
16. Spanghel MJ, Younger AS, Masri BA, Duncan CP. Diagnosis of infection following total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg. 1997;79A:1578-88.
17. Tunney MM, Patrick S, Gorman SP. Replacements. A currently underestimated problem. J Bone Joint Surg. 1998;80:568-72.
18. Bindelglass DF. Infected total knee arthroplasy. Curr Opin Orthop. 1997;8:36-40.
19. Fitzgerald RH, Nolan DR, Ilstrup DM, Van Scoy RE, Washington JA, Coventry MB. Deep wound sepsis following total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg. 1977;59A:847-55.
20. Fitzgerald RH. Total hip arthroplasty sepsis, prevention and diagnosis. Orthop Clin North Am. 1992;23:259-64.
21. García E. Revisión protésica del componente acetabular en la artroplastia total de cadera. Rev Ortop Traumatol. 2000;2:168-77.
22. Harwin SF. Diagnosis and Treatment of infected total hip arthroplasty. October 2002; 1-5. Available in: http://www.orthop.hyperguides.com/multimedia/ transcript.asp?presentation-ID=202.
23. McAuley JP, Moreau G. Sepsis: Etiology, prophylaxis and diagnosis. In: Callaghan JJ, Rosenberg AG, Rubash HE, editors. The adult hip. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven publishers; 1998. p. 1295-306.
24. Munjal S, Phillips M, Krackow K. Reintervención de revisión de artroplastia de rodilla: planificación, controversias y tratamiento-infección. In: Beaty JH, editor. Instructional Course Lectures American Academy of Orthopaedics Surgeons. Barcelona; 2002. p. 135-47.
25. Palestro CJ, Kim CK, Swyer A, Capozzi JD, Solomon RW, Goldsmith S. Total-hip arthroplasty: Periprosthetic Indium-111-labeled leukocyte activity and complementary Technetium-99m-sulfur colloid imaging in suspected infection. J Nucl Med. 1990;31:1950-5.
26. Palestro CJ, Roumanas P, Swyer AJ, Kim CK, Goldsmith SJ. Diagnosis of musculoskeletal infection using combined In-111 labeled leukocyte and Tc-99mSC marrow imaging. Clin Nucl Med. 1992;17:269-73.
27. De Winter F, Van de Miele C, Vogelarsers D, De Smet K, Verdonk R, Dierckx RA. Fluorine-18 Fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography: a highly accurate imaging modality for the diagnosis of chronic musculoskeletal infections. J Bone Joint Surg. 2001;83A:651-60.
28. Glithero PR, Grigoris P, Harding LK, Hesslewood SR, McMinn DJ. White cell scans and infected joint replacements. J Bone Joint Surg. 1993;75:371-4.
29. Oyen W, van Horm J, Claessens R, Slooff T, van der Meer J, Corstens F. Diagnosis of bone, joint and joint prostheses infection with IN-111-labeled non-specific human immunoglobulin G scintigraphy. Radiology. 1992;182:195-9.
30. Palestro CJ. Radionuclide imaging after skeletal interventional procedures. Semin Nucl Med. 1995;25: 3-14.
31. Romanillos JO, Rodríguez EC. La prótesis de cadera dolorosa. In: Rodríguez EC, Ortega M, Carro A, coordinators. Recambios protésicos de cadera. Madrid: Médica Panamericana; 2000. p. 119-32.
32. Scher DM, Pack K, Looner JH, Finkel JE, Dicesare PE, Zuckerman JD. The predictive Value of Indium-111 Leukocyte Scans in the diagnosis of infected total hip, knee or resection athroplasties. Medscape Orthopaedics. 1999;1:1-4.
33. Palestro CJ, Love C, Tronco GG, Tomas MB. Role of radionuclide Imaging in the diagnosis of Postoperative Infection. Radiographics. 2000;20:1649-60.
34. Palestro CJ, Torres MA. Radionuclide Imaging in Ortopedic Infection. Semin Nucl Med. 1997;27:334-45.
35. Becker W. The contribution of nuclear medicine to the patient with infection. Eur J Nucl Med. 1995;22:1195-211.
36. Robiller FC, Stumpe KD, Kossmann T, Weisshaupt D, Bruder E, von Schulthess GK. Chronic osteomyelitis of the femur: value of PET imaging. Eur Radiol. 2000;10:855-8.
37. Seabold JE, Nepola JV. Imaging techniques for evaluation of postoperative orthopedic infections. Q J Nucl Med. 1999;42:21-8.
38. Guhlmann A, Brecht-Krauss D, Suger G, Glatting G, Kotzerke J, Kinzl L, et al. Fluorine-18-FDG PET and Technetium-99m antigranulocyte antibody scintigraphy in chronic osteomyelitis. Eur J Nucl Med. 1998;39:2145-52.
39. Palestro CJ, Kim CK, Swyer AJ, Vallabhajosula S, Goldsmith SJ. Radionuclide diagnosis of vertebral osteomyelitis: indium-111 leukocite and technetium-99m methylene diphosphonate bone scintigraphy. J Nucl Med. 1991;32:1861-5.
40. Manthey N, Reinhard P, Moog F, Knesewitsch P, Kahn K, Tatsch K. The use of [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography to differentiate between synovitis, loosening and infection of hip and knee prostheses. Nucl Med Commun. 2002; 23:645-53.
41. Manthey N, Reinhard P, Tatsch K, Hahn K. FDG PET to differentiate between loosening and infection of hip and knee prostheses. J Nucl Med. 1999;40 Suppl:96-7.
42. Shnier D, Bernard F, Glaser D, Garino J, Alavi A. FDG-PET imaging accurately assesses suspected infection of orthopaedic prostheses. J Nucl Med. 1998;39 Suppl:33.
43. Van Acker F, Nuyts J, Maes A, Vanquickenborne B, Stuyck J, Bellemans J, et al. FDG-PET, 99mTc-HMPAO white blood cell SPET and Bone scintigraphy in the evaluation of painful total knee arthroplasties. Eur J Nucl Med. 2001;28:1496-504.
44. Zhuang H, Chacko TK, Hickeson M, Feng Q, Ponzo F, Garino J, et al. Persistent non-specific FDG uptake on PET imaging following hip arthroplasty. Eur J Nucl Med. 2002;29:1328-33.
45. Zhuang H, Duarte PS, Maes A, Van Acker F, Shinier D. The promising role of the 18-F-FDG PET in detecting infected lower limb prosthesis implants. J Nucl Med. 2001;42:44-8.
46. DeLee J, Charnley J. Radiological demarcation of cemented sockets in total hip replacement. Clin Orthop. 1976;121:20-32.
47. Gruen TA, McNeice G, Amstutz H. "Modes of Failure" of cemented stem-type femoral components. Clin Orthop. 1979;141:17-27.
48. Guhlmann A, Brecht-Krauss D, Suger G, Glatting G, Kotzerke J, Kinzl L, et al. Chronic osteomyelitis: detection with FDG PET and correlation with histopathologic findings. Radiology. 1998;206:749-54.
49. Kalicke T, Schmitz A, Risse JH, Arens S, Keller E, Hansins M, et al. Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose PET in infectious bone diseases: results of histologically confirmed cases. Eur J Nucl Med. 2000;27:524-8.
50. Chako TK, Zhuang H, Stevenson K, Moussavian B, Alavi A. The importance of the location of fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in periprosthetic infection in painful hip prostheses. Nucl Med Commun. 2002;23:851-5.
51. Cremerius U, Mumme T, Reinartz P, Wirtz D, Niethard FU, Büll U. Analysis of 18-F-FDG uptake patterns in PET for diagnosis of septic and aseptic loosening after total hip arthroplasty. Nuklearmedizin. 2003:42:234-9.
52. Zhuang H, Alavi A. 18-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomographic Imaging in the Detection and Monitoring of infection and Inflammation. Sem Nucl Med. 2002;1:47-59.
53. Zhuang H, Duarte PS, Pourdehand M, Shinier D, Alavi A. Exclusion of chronic osteomielitis with F-18 Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomographic Imaging. Clin Nucl Med. 2000;25:281-4.
54. Vanquickenborne B, Maes A, Nuyts J, Van Acker F, Stuyck J, Mulier M, et al. The value of 18-FDG-PET for the detection of infected hip prosthesis. Eur J Nucl Med. 2003;30:705-15.
55. Love VJ, Hoffman JM, DeLong DM, Patz EF, Coleman RE. Semicuantitative and visual analysis of FDG-PET images in pulmonary abnormalities. J Nucl Med. 1994;11:1971-6.
56. Sugawara Y, Braun DK, Kison PV, Russo JE, Zasadny KR, Wahl RL. Rapid detection of human infections with fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose and positron emission tomography: preliminary results. Eur J Nucl Med. 1998;25:1238-43.
57. Sugawara Y, Gutowski TD, Fisher SJ, Brown RS, Wahl RL. Uptake of positron emission tomography tracers in experimental bacterial infections: a comparative biodistribution study of radiolabeled FDG, thymidine, L-methionine, 67-Ga- citrate and 125I-HAS. Eur J Nucl Med. 1999;26:333-41.
58. Gratz S, Becker W. Infection scintigraphty with 99m-Tc-labeled monoclonal antibody Fab'-fragments (LeukoScan®). Munchen: Zucksch-werdt W. 1999. p. 38.
59. Hervás I, Saura A, Pérez-Velasco R, Bello P, González-Cabezas P, Cabanes F, et al. Gammagrafía ósea con leucocitos marcados y nanocoloides en un caso de infección de prótesis ósea. Rev Esp Med Nucl. 2002;21:398.
60. Jiménez A, Contreras PI, Rebollo AC. Gammagrafía con fragmentos Fab'antigranulocitos-99mTc y ósea en tres fases en el estudio de la prótesis de cadera y rodilla dolorosas. Rev Esp Med Nuc. 2002;21:286-93.
61. Merkel K, Brown M, Dewanjee M, Fitzgerald R. Comparison of indium-labelled-leukocyte imaging with sequential technecium-gallium scanning in the diagnosis of low-grade muskuloskeletal sepsis. J Bone Joint Surg. 1985;67:466-76.
62. Mulamba L, Ferrant A, Leners N, De Nayer P, Rombouts J, Vincent Indium-111 leucocyte scanning in the evaluation of painful hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Scand. 1983;54:695-7.
63. Palestro CJ. The current role of gallium imaging in infection. Sem Nucl Med. 1994;24:128-41.
64. Peters AM. The use of nuclear medicine in infections. J Radiol. 1998;71:252-61.
65. Rand JA, Brown ML. The value of Indium 111 Leukocyte scanning in the evaluation of painful or infected total knee arthroplasties. Clin Orthop. 1990;259:179-82.