Rights, responsibilities and NICE: A rejoinder to Harris

Journal of Medical Ethics

Volumn 33, Issue 8, 2007, Pages 462-464

  Claxton, Karl ^a   Culyer, Anthony J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

^b INSTITUTE FOR WORK AND HEALTH   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ECONOMICS; ETHICS; GOVERNMENT; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; PUBLIC HEALTH; QUALITY ADJUSTED LIFE YEAR; UNITED KINGDOM;

COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; GOVERNMENT AGENCIES; GREAT BRITAIN; HEALTH CARE COSTS; HEALTH CARE RATIONING; HUMANS; NATIONAL HEALTH PROGRAMS; QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE; QUALITY-ADJUSTED LIFE YEARS;

EID: 34547799271     PISSN: 03066800     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/jme.2006.018903     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Harris J. Nice is not cost-effective. J Med Ethics 2006; 32:378-80.
2. Claxton K, Culyer AJ. Wickedness or folly? the ethics of NICE's decisions. J Med Ethics 2006;32:373-7.
3. Harris J. It's not NICE to discriminate. J Med Ethics 2005;31:373-5.
4. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Guide to the methods of technology appraisal. London: NICE, 2003.
5. Culyer AJ, McCabe CJ, Briggs A, et al. Searching for a threshold, not setting one: the role of the National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence. J Health Serv Res and Policy 2007; 12:56-9.
6. AR. Bentham in a box: Technology Assessment and Health care allocation. Law Medicine and Health Care 1986;14:172-4.
7. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Citizens Council report: the rule of rescue. London: NICE, 2006.