Durability of a cardiac valve leaflet made of calf pericardium: Fatigue and energy consumption

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part A

Volumn 77, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 839-849

  Garcia Paez J M ^a   Carrera Sanmartin A ^b   Jorge Herrero, E ^a   Millan I ^a   Cordon, A ^b   Rocha, A ^a   Maestro, M ^a   Burgos, R ^a   Tellez, G ^a   Castillo Olivares, J L ^a  

^a HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARIO PUERTA DE HIERRO   (Spain)

^b ETS Ingenieros de Telecomunicacion   (Spain)

Author keywords

Cardiac bioprostheses; Durability; Energy consumption; Fatigue

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL MEMBRANES; BIOMIMETICS; CARDIOLOGY; DURABILITY; ENERGY UTILIZATION; FATIGUE OF MATERIALS;

CARDIAC BIOPROSTHESES; CYCLIC PRESSURES; PROSTHETIC VALVE LEAFLETS;

HEART VALVE PROSTHESES;

ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; CALF (BOVINE); CONTROLLED STUDY; ENERGY CONSUMPTION; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; MECHANICAL STRESS; NONHUMAN; PERICARDIUM;

ANIMALS; BIOPROSTHESIS; CATTLE; ENERGY METABOLISM; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; PERICARDIUM;

EID: 34547793723     PISSN: 15493296     EISSN: 15524965     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.30650     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Cannegieter SC, Rosendal FR, Briet E. Thromboembolic and bleeding complications in patients with mechanical heart valve prostheses. Circulation 1994;89:635-641.
2. Vesely I. The evolution of bioprosthetic heart valve design and its impact on durability. Cardiovasc Pathol 2003;12:277-286.
3. Tyers GFO, Jamieson WR, Munro IA, Germann E, Burr LH, Miyagishima RT, Ling L. Reoperation in biological and mechanical valve populations: Fate of the reoperative patient. Ann Thorac Surg 1995;60:S464-S469.
4. Kent PD, Tazelaar HD, Edwards WD, Orszulak TA. Temporal changes in the surgical pathology of prosthetic aortic valves: A study of 157 cases spanning 26 years (1970-1995). Cardiovasc Pathol 1998;7:9-23.
5. Bortolotti U, Milano A, Mossuto E, Mazzaro E, Thiene G, Casarotto D. Early and late outcome after reoperation for prosthetic valve dysfunction: Analysis of 549 patients during a 26-year period. J Heart Valve Dis 1994;3:81-87.
6. Vongpatanasin W, Hillis LD, Lange RA. Medical progress: Prosthetic heart valves. N Engl J Med 1996;335:407-416.
7. Glower DD, White WD, Hatton AC, Smith LR, Young WG, Wolfe WG, Lowe JE. Determinants of reoperation after 960 valve replacements with Carpentier-Edwards prostheses. J Cardiovasc Surg 1994;107:381-393.
8. Guerra F, Bortolotti U, Thiene G. Long-term performance of the Hancock porcine bioprosthesis in tricuspid position: A review of forty-five patients with fourteen-years follow-up. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1990;99:838-845.
9. Grunkemeier GL, Jamieson WRE, Miller DC, Starr A. Actuarial versus actual risk of porcine structural valve deterioration. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1994;108:709-718.
10. Hariza F, Papouin G, Barratt-Boyes B, Christie G, Whitlock R. Tear in bioprosthetic heart valve leaflets without calcific degeneration. J Heart Valve Dis 1996;5:35-39.
11. Simionescu D, Simionescu A, Deac R. Mapping of glutaraldehyde treated bovine pericardium and tissue selection for bioprosthetic heart valves. J Biomed Mater Res 1993;27:697-704.
12. Hiester ED, Sacks MS. Optimal bovine pericardial tissue selection sites. I. Fiber architecture and tissue thickness measurements. J Biomed Mater Res 1998;39:207-214.
13. Hiester ED, Sacks MS. Optimal bovine pericardial tissue selection sites. II. Cartographic analysis. J Biomed Mater Res 1998;39:215-221.
14. Braile DM, Soares MJ, Souza DR, Ramirez DA, Suzigan S, Godoy MF. Mapping of bovine pericardium: Physical and histopathologic test. J Heart Valve Dis 1998;7:202-206.
15. Carrera A, García Páez JM, García Sestafe JV, Jorge Herrero E, Salvador J, Cordón A, Castillo-Olivares JL. Selection and interaction of biomaterials used in the construction of cardiac bioprostheses. J Biomed Mater Res 1998;39:568-574.
16. Mausner J, Bahn A. In: Mausner J, Kramer S, editors. Epidemiology: An Introductory Text. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Company; 1985, p 154-159.
17. García Páez JM, Jorge E, Carrera A, Millán I, Rocha A, Calero P, Cordón A, Sainz N, Castillo-Olivares JL. Ostrich pericardium, a biomaterial for the construction of valve leaflets for cardiac bioprostheses: Mechanical behaviour, selection and interaction with suture materials. Biomaterials 2001;22:2731-2740.
18. Bortolotti U, Milano A, Mazzucco A. The Hancock pericardial xenograft: Incidence of early mechanical failures at a medium-term follow-up. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1988;2:458-464.
19. Carrera A, García Páez JM, García Sestafe JV, Jorge-Herrero E, Millán I, Navidad R, Castillo-Olivares JL. Behavior of bovine pericardium used in cardiac bioprotheses when subjected to real fatigue assay. Biomaterials 1993;14:76-79.
20. Sun W, Sacks M, Fulchiero G, Lovekamp J, Vyavahare N, Scott M. Response of heterograft heart valve biomaterials to moderate cyclic loading. J Biomed Mater Res 2004;69:658-669.
21. García Páez JM, Carrera A, Jorge E, Millán I, Cordón A, Rocha A, Salvador J, Méndez J, Sanz N, Castillo-Olivares JL. Uniaxial and biaxial tensile strength of calf pericardium used in the construction of bioprostheses: Biomaterial selection criteria. J Biomater Appl 2000;15:47-64.
22. García Páez JM, Jorge E, Carrera A, Millán I, Rocha A, Salvador J, Méndez J, Téllez G, Castillo-Olivares JL. Porcine pericardial membrane subjected to tensile testing: Preliminary study of the process of selecting tissue for use in the construction of cardiac bioprostheses. J Mater Sci: Mater Med 2001;12:425-430.
23. Sacks M, Chuong CJ, More R. Collagen fiber architecture of bovine pericardium. ASAIO J 1994;40:M632-M637.
24. Timoshenko S. Propiedades mecánicas de los materiales. In: Resistencia de Materiales. Vol. II. Madrid: Espasa Calpe; 1970. p 398-491 (Spanish translation of "Strength of Materials").
25. Sacks MS, He Z, Baijens L, Wananat S, Shah P, Sugimoto H, Yoganathan AP. Surface strain in the anterior leaflet of the functioning mitral valve. Ann Biomed Eng 2002;30:1281-1290.
26. Zioupus P, Barbenel JC, Fischer J. Mechanical and optical anisotropy of bovine pericardium. Med Biol Eng Comput 1992;30:76-82.
27. Zioupus P, Barbenel JC, Fischer J. Anisotropic elasticity and strength of glutaraldehyde fixed bovine pericardium for use in pericardial bioprosthetic valves. J Biomed Mater Res 1994;28:49-57.
28. Zioupus P, Barbenel JC. Mechanics of native bovine pericardium. I. The multiangular behaviour of strength and stiffness of the tissue. Biomaterials 1994;15:366-373.
29. Zioupus P, Barbenel JC. Mechanics of native bovine pericardium. II. A structure based model for the anisotropic mechanical behaviour of the tissue. Biomaterials 1994;15:374-382.
30. Mirnajafi A, Raymer J, Scott MJ, Sacks MS. The effects of collagen fiber orientation on the flexural properties of pericardial heterograft biomaterials. Biomaterials 2005;26:795-804.
31. Thubrikar MJ, Deck DJ, Aouad J. Role of mechanical stress in calcification of aortic bioprosthetic valves. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1983;86:115-125.
32. Levy RJ. Glutaraldehyde and the calcification mechanism of bioprosthetic heart valves. J Heart Valve Dis 1994;3:101-103.
33. Bustamante J, Santamaría J, Infante O, Flores P, Juárez A. Evaluación dinámica y cinemática de la función de bioprótesis en posición aórtica. Arch Inst Cardiol Méx 1996;66:229-243.