Evaluating domestic violence initiatives

British Journal of Criminology

Volumn 47, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 671-691

  Parmar, Alpa ^a   Sampson, Alice ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EAST LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34547780501     PISSN: 00070955     EISSN: 14643529     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bjc/azl094     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. ABRAHAMS, H. (2004), 'A Long Hard Road to Go By: A Study of the Support Carried Out in Women's Aid Refuges', unpublished PhD, Faculty of Social Sciences, School for Policy Studies. University of Bristol.
2. BARTON, R. (1987), The Scarlet Thread: An Indian Woman Speaks. London: Virago.
3. BATSLEER, J., BURMAN, E., CHANTLER, K, MCINTOSH, S., PANTLING, K, SMAILES, S. and WARNER, S. (2002), Domestic Violence and Minoritisation: Supporting Women to Independence. Manchester: Manchester Metropolitan University.
4. BURGESS, T. (2002), 'Towards a Social Science: A Comment on Karl Popper's Twenty Seven Theses', paper presented at the Karl Popper Centenary Congress, 3-7 July, University of Vienna, Austria.
5. BURMAN, E. and SMAILES, S. (2002), 'Barriers to Services II: "Cultural Issues'", inj. Batsleer, E. Burman, K. Chantler, S. H. McIntosh, K. Pantling, S. Smailes and S. Warner, eds, Domestic Violence and Minoritisation: Supporting Women to Independence. Manchester: Women's Studies Research Centre, Manchester Metropolitan University.
6. CAMPBELL, D. (1979), 'Assessing the Impact of Planned Social Change', Evaluation and Programme Planning, 2: 67-90.
7. CAMPBELL, D. and STANLEY, J. (1966), Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research. Chicago: Rand McNally.
8. CHEN, H. and Rossi, P. (1992), 'Introduction: Integrating Theory into Evaluation Practice', in H. Chen and P. Rossi, eds, Using Theory to Improve Program and Policy Evaluations. New York: Greenwood Press.
9. CONNELL. J., KUBISCH, A., SCHORR, A. and WEISS, C. (1995), New Approaches to Evaluating Community Initiatives: Concepts, Methods, and Contexts. Washington: Aspen Institute.
10. CORDRAY, D. (1986), 'Quasi-Experimental Analysis: A Mixture of Methods and Judgment', in W. Trochim, ed., Advances in Quasi-Experimental Design and Analysis. London:Jossey-Bass Inc.
11. CRETNEY, A. and DAVIS, G. ( 1997), 'The Significance of Compellability in the Prosecution of Domestic Assault', British Journal of Criminology, 37: 75-89.
12. CRONBACH, L. (1982), Designing Evaluations of Educational and Social Programmes. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
13. DALY, M. and TONRY, M. (1997), Crime and Justice: A Review of Research. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
14. DOBASH, R. and DOBASH, R. (1979), Violence against Wives. London: Open Books.
15. DOBASH, R. E., DOBASH, R. P., CAVANAGH, K. and LEWIS, R. (1996), Research Evaluation of Programmes for Violent Men. Edinburgh: The Scottish Office Central Research Unit.
16. DOLOWITZ, D. and MARSH, D. (1996), Who Learns What from Whom: A Review of the Policy Transfer Literature, Muirhead Papers 10. Birmingham: University of Birmingham.
17. EDWARDS, S. (1986), 'Police Attitudes and Dispositions in Domestic Disputes: The London Study', Police Journal, July.
18. EKBLOM, P., LAW, H. and SUTTON, M. (1996), Safer Cities and Domestic Burglary, Home Office Research Study 164. London: Home Office.
19. GILL, A. (2004), 'Voicing the Silent Fear: South Asian Women's Experiences of Domestic Violence', The Howard Journal, 43.
20. GORDON, L. (1988), Heroes of their Own Lives. New York: Penguin Books.
21. GRANGE, R. ( 1998), 'Establishing Causality in Evaluations of Comprehensive Community Initiatives', in K. Fullbright-Anderson, A. Kubisch and J. Connell, eds, New Approaches to Evaluating Community Initiatives: Concepts, Methods, and Contexts, Volume 2. Washington: Aspen Institute.
22. HANMER, J. and SAUNDERS, S. (1984), Well-Founded Fear. London: Hutchinson.
23. HESTER, M. and WESTMARLAND, N. (2005), Tackling Domestic Violence: Effective Interventions and Approaches, Home Office Research Study 290. London: Home Office.
24. HOPE, T. (2002), 'The Road Taken: Evaluation, Replication and Crime Reduction', in G. Hughes, E. McLaughlin and J. Muncie, eds, Crime Prevention and Community Safety: New Directions. London: Sage Publications Ltd.
25. JARVIE, I. (1972), Concepts and Society. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
26. KELLY, L. (1987), Surviving Sexual Violence. Cambridge: Polity Press.
27. _(1999), Domestic Violence Matters: An Evaluation of a Development Project, Home Office Research Study 193. London: Home Office.
28. MAMA, A. (1996), The Hidden Struggle: Statutory and Voluntary Sector Responses to Violence Against Black Women in the Home. London: Whiting and Birch.
29. _(2000), 'Violence against Black Women in the Home', in J. Hanmer and C. Itzin, eds, Home Truths About Domestic Violence: Feminist Influences on Policy and Practice a Reader. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
30. MARK, M. (1998), 'Validity Typologies and the Logic and Practice of Quasi-Experimentation', in W. Trochim, ed., Advances in Quasi-Experimental Design and Analysis. London: Jossey-Bass Inc.
31. MARTINSON, R. (1974), 'What Works? Questions and Answers about Prison Reform', The Public Interest 10: 22-54.
32. MCGUIRE, J. and PRIESTLEY, P. (1995), 'Reviewing "What Works": Past, Present and Future', in J. McGuire, ed., What Works: Reducing Reoffending Guidelines from Research and Practice, The Wiley Series in Offender Rehabilitation. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.
33. MIRRLESS-BLACK, C. (1999), Domestic Violence: Findings from a Neiv British Crime Survey SelfCompletion Questionnaire, Home Office Research Study 191. London: Home Office.
34. MOONEY, J. (2000), 'Women's Experiences of Violence', inj. Hanmer and C. Itzin, eds, Home Truths About Domestic Violence: Feminist Influences on Policy and Practice a Reader. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
35. NEWHAM ASIAN WOMEN'S PROJECT (2003), Safety and Justice: The Government's Proposals on Domestic Violence. London: NAWP.
36. NUTLEY, S., WALTER, I. and DAVIES, H. (2003), 'From Knowing to Doing: A Framework for Understanding the Evidence-Into-Practice Agenda', Evaluation, 9: 125-48.
37. OAKLEY, A. (2000), Experiments in Knowing: Gender and Method in Social Sciences. Cambridge: Polity Press.
38. PAHL, J. (1985), Private Violence and Public Policy. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
39. PARMAR, A. and SAMPSON, A. (2003a), Final Site Report for the Croydon Domestic Violence Advocacy Service, unpublished.
40. _(2003b), Final Site Report for the Reducing Domestic Violence Project (ASHRAM) Birmingham, unpublished.
41. _(2003c), Final Site Report for the Victim Advocacy and Safety Counselling Service Tower Hamlets, unpublished.
42. _(2005a), Tackling Domestic Violence: Providing Advocacy and Support to Survivors of Domestic Violence, Home Office Development and Practice Report No. 34. London: Home Office.
43. _(2005b), Tackling Domestic Violence: Providing Advocacy and Support to Survivors from Black and Other Minority Ethnic Communities, Home Office Development and Practice Report No. 35. London: Home Office.
44. PATEL, P. (2000) 'Women Who Fight Back', in J. Hanmer and C. Itzin, with S. Quaid and D. Wigglesworth, eds, Home Truths About Domestic Violence: Feminist Influences on Policy and Practice-A Reader. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
45. PAWSON, R. and TILLEY, N. (1994), 'What Works in Evaluation Research?', British Journal of Criminology, 34.
46. _(1997), Realistic Evaluation. London: Sage.
47. PEASE, K. (1997), 'Crime Prevention', in M. Maguire, R. Morgan and R. Reiner, eds, The Oxford Handbook of Criminology, 2nd edn, Chapter 27. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
48. PLECK, E. (1987), Domestic Tyranny: The Making of Social Policy against Family Violence from Colonial Times to Present. New York: Oxford University Press.
49. POPPER, K. (1968), The Logic of Scientific Discovery, 2nd edn. London: Hutchinson.
50. _(1969), Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge, 3rd edn. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
51. RAI, D. and THIARA, R. (1997), Re-defining Spaces: The Needs of Black Women and Children in Refuge Support Services and Black Workers in Women's Aid Bristol: Women's Aid Federation of England.
52. READ, T. and TILLEY, N. (2000), Not Rocket Science? Problem Solving and Crime Reduction, Crime Reduction Research Series Paper 6. London: Home Office.
53. RICCIO, J. and ORENSTEIN, A. (1996), 'Understanding Best Practices for Operating WelfareTo-Work Programs', Evaluation Review, 20: 3-28.
54. SAYER, A. ( 1992), Method in Social Science: A Realist Approach, 2nd edn. London: Routledge.
55. SHERMAN, L., ROGAN, D. and SCHMIDT, J. (1992), Policing Domestic Violence: Experiments and Dilemmas. New York: Free Press.
56. SHERMAN, L., GOTTFREDSON, D., MACKENZIE, D., ECK, J., REUTER, P. and BUSHWAY, S. (1997), Preventing Crime: What Works, What Doesn't, What's Promising: A Report to the United States Congress, Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
57. STANKO, B. (1985), Intimate Intrusions: Women's Experience of Male Violence. London: Routledge.
58. STANKO, E. (1987), 'Typical Violence, Normal Precaution: Men, Women and Interpersonal Violence in England, Wales, Scotland and the USA', in J. Hamner and M. Maynard, eds, Women, Violence and Social Control. London: Macmillan.
59. TILLEY, N. and LAYCOCK, G. (2002), Working Out What to Do: Evidence-Based Crime Reduction, Crime Reduction Series Paper 11. London: Home Office.
60. WEISS, C. (1997a), 'How Can Theory-Based Evaluation Make Greater Headway?', Evaluation Review, 21: 501-24.
61. _(1997b), 'Theory-Based Evaluation: Past, Present and Future', New Directions for Evaluation, 76: 41-55.
62. ZEDNER, L. (1997), 'Victims', in M. Maguire, R. Morgan and R. Reiner eds, The Oxford Handbook of Criminology, 2nd edn, Chapter 18. Oxford: Oxford University Press.