Patient reported outcomes: General principles of development and interpretability;Ogólne podstawy i zasady interpretacji punktów końcowych ocenianych przez pacjenta

Polskie Archiwum Medycyny Wewnetrznej

Volumn 117, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 5-11

  Bryant, Dianne ^a   Schünemann, Holger ^b   Brozek, Jan ^c   Jaeschke, Roman ^d   Guyatt, Gordon ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

^b REGINA ELENA NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (Italy)

^c JAGIELLONIAN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL COLLEGE   (Poland)

^d MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Health; Outcomes; Quality of life

Indexed keywords

CHRONIC DISEASE; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF FUNCTIONING, DISABILITY AND HEALTH; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; QUALITY OF LIFE; REVIEW; SELF REPORT; TREATMENT OUTCOME; CLASSIFICATION; DISABILITY; EDITORIAL; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF DISEASES; METHODOLOGY; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SICKNESS IMPACT PROFILE;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; DISABILITY EVALUATION; HEALTH STATUS INDICATORS; HUMANS; INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF DISEASES; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PATIENT PARTICIPATION; QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE; QUALITY OF LIFE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SICKNESS IMPACT PROFILE;

EID: 34547779038     PISSN: 00323772     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (60)

1. Jaeschke R, Guyatt GH, Willan A, et al. Effect of increasing doses of beta agonists on spirometric parameters, exercise capacity, and quality of life in patients with chronic airflow limitation. Thorax. 1994; 49: 479-484.
2. Juniper EF, Svensson K, O'Byrne PM, et al. Asthma quality of life during 1 year of treatment with budesonide with or without formoterol. European Respiratory Journal. 1999; 14: 1038-1043.
3. Stratford PW, Kennedy D, Pagura SM, Gollish JD. The relationship between self-report and performance-related measures: questioning the content validity of timed tests Arthritis Rheum. 2003; 49: 535-540.
4. Galatz LM, Ball CM, Teefey SA, et al. The outcome and repair integrity of completely arthroscopically repaired large and massive rotator cuff tears. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004; 86: 219-224.
5. Roddey TS, Cook KF, O'Malley KJ, Gartsman GM. The relationship among strength and mobility measures and self-report outcome scores in persons after rotator cuff repair surgery: impairment measures are not enough. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2005; 14 (1 Suppl S): S95-S98.
6. Juniper EF, Guyatt GH, Epstein RS, et al. Evaluation of impairment of health related quality of life in asthma: development of a questionnaire for use in clinical trials. Thorax. 1992; 47: 76-83.
7. Juniper EF, Guyatt GH, Willan A, Griffith LE. Determining a minimal important change in a disease-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire. J Clin Epidemiol. 1994; 47: 81-87.
8. Preamble to the Constitution of the World Health Organization as adopted by the International Health Conference. Official Records of the World Health Organization, no. 2, p. 100 and entered into force on 7 April 1948 19-22 June, 1946; signed on 22 July 1946 by the representatives of 61 States; New York.
9. World Health Organization. International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities, and Handicaps: A manual of classification relating to the consequences of disease. Geneva, World Health Organization, 1980.
10. World Health Organization. Towards a common language for functioning, disability, and health: ICF The International Classification of Impairment, Disability and Health. Geneva, World Heatlh Organization, 2002. Report No: WHO/EIP/GPE/CAS/01.3.
11. Jackowski D, Guyatt G. A guide to health measurement. Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research. 2003; 413: 80-89.
12. Bergner M, Bobbitt RA, Carter WB, Gilson BS. The Sickness Impact Profile: development and final revision of a health status measure. Med Care. 1981; 19: 787-805.
13. Bergner M, Bobbitt RA, Kressel S, et al. The sickness impact profile: conceptual formulation and methodology for the development of a health status measure. Int J Health Serv. 1976; 6: 393-415.
14. Bergner M, Bobbitt RA, Pollard WE, et al. The sickness impact profile: validation of a health status measure. Med Care. 1976; 14: 57-67.
15. de Bruin AF, Buys M, de Witte LP, Diederiks JP. The sickness impact profile: SIP68, a short generic version. First evaluation of the reliability and reproducibility. J Clin Epidemiol. 1994; 47: 863-871.
16. de Bruin AF, Diederiks JP, de Witte LP, et al. The development of a short generic version of the Sickness Impact Profile. J Clin Epidemiol. 1994; 47: 407-418.
17. de Bruin AF, Diederiks JP, de Witte LP, et al. Assessing the responsiveness of a functional status measure: the Sickness Impact Profile versus the SIP68. [Review] [38 refs]. J Clin Epidemiol. 1997; 50: 529-540.
18. Hunt SM, McEwen J. The development of a subjective health indicator. [Review] [62 refs]. Sociol Health IIIn. 1980; 2: 231-246.
19. Hunt SM, McKenna SP, McEwen J, et al. A quantitative approach to perceived health status: a validation study. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1980; 34: 281-286.
20. Hunt SM, McKenna SP, McEwen J, et al. The Nottingham Health Profile: subjective health status and medical consultations. Soc Sci Med. 1981;15: 221-229.
21. Hunt SM, McKenna SP, Williams J. Reliability of a population survey tool for measuring perceived health problems: a study of patients with osteoarthrosis. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1981; 35: 297-300.
22. Hunt SM, McEwen J, McKenna SP. Measuring health status: a new tool for clinicians and epidemiologists. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1985; 35: 185-188.
23. McKenna SP, McEwen J, Hunt SM, Papp E. Changes in the perceived health of patients recovering from fractures. Public Health. 1984; 98: 97-102.
24. McHorney CA, Ware JE Jr, Raczek AE. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs. Med Care. 1993; 31: 247-63.
25. McHorney CA, Ware JE Jr, Lu JF, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): III. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability across diverse patient groups. Med Care. 1994; 32: 40-66.
26. Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992; 30: 473-483.
27. Ware JE Jr, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: Construction of Scales and Preliminary Tests of Reliability and Validity. Medical Care. 1996; 34: 220-233.
28. Wiebe S, Guyatt G, Weaver B, et. al. Comparative responsiveness of generic and specific quality-of-life instruments. J Clin Epidemiol. 2003; 56: 52-60.
29. Influence Diagrams. In: Howard RA, Matheson JE, eds. The Principles and Applications of Decision-Analysis Menol Park: Strategic Decisions Group, 1984.
30. Ledley RS, Lusted LB. Reasoning foundations of medical diagnosis. Science. 1959; 130: 9-21.
31. Sox HC. Decision analysis: a basic clinical skill? N Engl J Med. 1987; 316: 271-272.
32. Von Neumann J, Morgenstern O. Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. 3rd ed. New York, Wiley, 1953.
33. Torrance GW, Thomas WH, Sackett DL. A utility maximization model for evaluation of health care programs. Health Serv Res. 1972; 7: 118-133.
34. Puhan MA, Guyatt GH, Montori VM, et al. The standard gamble demonstrated lower reliability than the feeling thermometer. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005; 58: 458-465.
35. Schünemann HJ, Griffith L, Jaeschke R, et al. Evaluation of the minimal important difference for the feeling thermometer and the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire in patients with chronic airflow obstruction. J Clin Epidemiol. 2003; 56: 1170-1176.
36. Schünemann HJ, Griffith L, Stubbing D, et al. A clinical trial to evaluate the measurement properties of 2 direct preference instruments administered with and without hypothetical marker states. Medical Decision Making. 2003; 23 : 140-149.
37. Kaplan RM, Anderson JP. The Quality of Well-Being Scale! Rationale for a Single Quality of Life Index. In: Walkee SR, Rosser R, eds. Quality of Life. Assessment and Application. London, MTP Press, 1988: 51-77.
38. Torrance GW, Furlong W, Feeny D, Boyle M. Multi-attribute preference functions. Health Utilities Index. [Review] [83 refs]. Pharmacoeconomics. 1995; 7: 503-520.
39. Feeny D, Furlong W, Boyle M, Torrance GW. Multi-attribute health status classification systems. Health Utilities Index. [Review] [58 refs]. Pharmacoeconomics. 1995; 7: 490-502.
40. Boyle MH, Furlong W, Feeny D, et al. Reliability of the Health Utilities Index - Mark III used in the 1991 cycle 6 Canadian General Social Survey Health Questionnaire. Qual Life Res. 1995; 4: 249-257.
41. Boyle MH, Furlong W, Feeny D, et al. Reliability of the Health Utilities Index - Mark III used in the 1991 cycle 6 Canadian General Social Survey Health Questionnaire. Qual Life Res. 1995; 4: 249-257.
42. Torrance GW, Feeny DH, Furlong WJ, Multiattribute utility function for a comprehensive health status classification system. Health Utilities Index Mark 2. Med Care. 1996; 34: 702-722.
43. EuroQol - a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. The EuroQol Group. [see comment]. Health Policy 1990; 16: 199-208.
44. Brooks R. EuroQol: the current state of play. [Review] [32 refs]. Health Policy. 1996; 37: 53-72.
45. Bosch JL, Halpern EF, Gazelle GS. Comparison of preference-based utilities of the Short-Form 36 Health Survey and Health Utilities Index before and after treatment of patients with intermittent claudication. Med Decis Making. 2002; 22: 403-409.
46. Brazier JE, Roberts J. The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-12. Med Care. 2004; 42: 851-859.
47. Sherbourne DC, Unutzer J, Schoenbaum M, Duan N, Lenert LA, Sturm R, et al. Can utility-weighted health-related quality-of-life estimates capture health effects of quality improvement for depression? Med Care. 2001; 39: 1246-1259.
48. Gabriel SE, Kneeland TS, Melton LJ 3rd, et. al. Health-related quality of life in economic evaluations for osteoporosis: whose values should we use? Med Decis Making. 1999; 19: 141-148.
49. O'Shea K, Bale E, Murray P. Cost analysis of primary total hip replacement. Ir Med J. 2002; 95: 177-180.
50. Pickard AS, Wang Z, Walton SM, Lee TA. Are decisions using cost-utility analyses robust to choice of SF-36/SF-12 preference-based algorithm? Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2005; 3: 11.
51. Shelbourne KD, Rask BP. The Sequelae of Salvaged Nondegenerative Peripheral Vertical Medial Meniscus Tears with ANterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2001; 17: 270-274.
52. Stratford PW, Goldsmith CH. Use of the standard error as a reliability index of interest: an applied example using elbow flexor strength data. Physical Therapy. 1997; 77: 745-750.
53. Liang MH. Longitudinal construct validity: establishment of clinical meaning in patient evaluative instruments.[see comment]. [Review] [37 refs]. Med Care. 2000; 38 (9 Suppl): 84-90.
54. Kirshner B, Guyatt G. A methodological framework for assessing health indices. J Chronic Dis. 1985; 38: 27-36.
55. Schünemann HJ, Puhan M, Goldstein R, et al Measurement properties and interpretability of the Chronic respiratory disease questionnaire (CRQ). COPD. 2005; 2: 81-89.
56. Schünemann HJ, Guyatt GH. Commentary - goodbye M(C)ID! Hello MID, where do you come from? Health Serv Res. 2005; 40: 593-597.
57. Jones PW. Interpreting thresholds for a clinically significant change in health status in asthma and COPD [see comment]. Eur Respr J. 2002; 19: 398-404.
58. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1988.
59. Guyatt GH, Berman LB, Townsend M, et al A measure of quality of life for clinical trials in chronic lung disease. Thorax. 1987; 42: 773-778.
60. Schünemann HJ, Puhan M, Goldstein R, et al. Measurement properties and interpretability of the Chronic respiratory disease questionnaire (CRQ). COPD. 2005; 2: 81-89.