Initial results with a mini-posterior approach for total hip arthroplasty

International Orthopaedics

Volumn 31, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2007, Pages

  Procyk, S ^a  

^a Clinique du Ter   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; LENGTH OF STAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PHYSIOTHERAPY; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIODIAGNOSIS; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS;

ADULT; AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; FEMALE; HUMANS; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ORTHOPEDICS; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 34547778979     PISSN: 03412695     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00264-007-0435-5     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Baker AS, Bitounis VC (1985) Abductor function after total hip replacement: an electromyographic and clinical review. J Bone Joint Surg 71B:47-50
2. Dixon MC, Scott RD, Shai PA, Stamos V (2004) A simple capsulorrhapy in a posterior approach for total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 19:373-376
3. Horwitz BR, Rockowitz NL, Goll SR et al (1993) A prospective randomized comparison of two surgical approaches to total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 291:154-163
4. Swanson TV (2005) Early results of 1000 consecutive, posterior, single-incision minimally invasive surgery total hip arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty 20(7 Suppl 3):26-32
5. Vicar AJ, Coleman CR (1984) A comparison of the anterolateral, transtrochanteric, and posterior surgical approaches in primary total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 188:152-159