An ontology of situated design teams

Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing: AIEDAM

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 295-308

  Gero, John S ^a   Kannengiesser, Udo ^b  

^a George Mason University   (United States)

^b CSIRO   (Australia)

Author keywords

Design teams; Function behavior structure framework; Situatedness; Team interaction

Indexed keywords

INTERACTIVE COMPUTER SYSTEMS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; ONTOLOGY; PRODUCT DESIGN; USER INTERFACES;

DESIGN TEAMS; FUNCTION-BEHAVIOR-STRUCTURE FRAMEWORK; SITUATEDNESS; TEAM INTERACTION;

COMPUTER SUPPORTED COOPERATIVE WORK;

EID: 34547778879     PISSN: 08900604     EISSN: 14691760     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0890060407000297     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Bartlett, F.C. (1932, reprinted in 1977). Remembering: A Study in Experimental and Social Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2. Bickhard, M.H., & Campbell, R.L. (1996). Topologies of learning. New Ideas in Psychology 14(2), 111-156.
3. Bradley, J.H., & Hebert, F.J. (1997). The effect of personality type on team performance. Journal of Management Development 16(5), 337-353.
4. Brown, D.C (1998). Defining configuring. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 12(4), 301-305.
5. Clancey, W.J. (1997). Situated Cognition: On Human Knowledge and Computer Representations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6. Clark, H.H. (1996). Using Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7. Cohen, P.R., & Levesque, H.J. (1991). Teamwork. Noûs 25(4), 487-512.
8. Corkill, D.D., & Lesser, V.R. (1983). The use of meta-level control for coordination in a distributed problem-solving network. In Int. Joint Conf. Artificial Intelligence '83 Bond, A.H., & Gasser, L., Eds.), pp. 748-755, Karlsruhe, Germany.
9. de Kleer, J., & Brown, J.S. (1984). A qualitative physics based on confluences. Artificial Intelligence 24, 7-83.
10. Dewey, J. (1981). The reflex arc concept in psychology. Psychological Review 3, 357-370.
11. Fischer, G. (2001). External and sharable artifacts as opportunities for social creativity in communities of interest. In Computational and Cognitive Models of Creative Design V (Gero, J.S., & Mäher, M.L., Eds.), pp. 67-89. Sydney, Australia: Key Centre of Design Computing and Cognition, University of Sydney.
12. Galbraith, J.R. (1977). Organization Design: An Information Processing View. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
13. Gero, J.S. (1990). Design prototypes: a knowledge representation schema for design. AI Magazine 11(4), 26-36.
14. Gero, J.S. (1999). Constructive memory in design thinking. In Design Thinking Research Symp.: Design Representation (Goldschmidt, G., & Porter, W., Eds.), pp. 29-35. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
15. Gero, J.S., & Fujii, H. (2000). A. computational framework for concept formation for a situated design agent. Knowledge-Based Systems 13(6), 361-368.
16. Gero, J.S., & Kannengiesser, U. (2004a). The situated function-behaviour-structure framework, Design Studies 25(4), 373-391.
17. Gero, J.S., & Kannengiesser, U. (2004a). Modelling expertise of temporary design teams. Journal of Design Research 4(2).
18. Kannengiesser, U., & Gero, J.S. (2007). Agent-based interoperability without product model standards. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering 22(2), 80-97.
19. Kramer, R.M., & Tyler, T.R., Eds, (1996). Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21. Levitt, R.E., Cohen, G.P., Kunz, J.C., Nass, C.I., Christiansen, T.R., & Jin, Y. (1994). The virtual design team: simulating how organization structure and information processing tools affect team performance. In Computational Organization Theory (Carley, K.M., & Prietula, M.J., Eds.), pp. 1-1.8. Hillsdale, NJ; Erlbaum.
22. Malone, T.W. (1987). Modeling coordination in organizations and markets. Management Science 33(10), 1317-1332.
23. Mesarović, M.D., Macko, D., & Takahara, Y. (1970). Theory of Hierarchical, Multilevel, Systems. New York: Academic Press.
24. Minsky, M. (1985). The Society of Mind. New York: Simon & Schuster
25. Nonaka, I. (1994). A. dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science 5(1), 14-37.
26. Schön, DA., & Wiggins, G. (1992), Kinds of seeing and their functions in designing. Design Studies 13(2), 135-156.
27. Smith, GJ., & Gero, J.S. (2005). What does an artificial, design, agent mean by being "situated"? Design Studies 26(5), 535-561.
28. Sosa, R., & Gero, J.S. (2005). A computational study of creativity in design: The role of society. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 19(4), 229-244.
29. Suwa, M., Gero, J.S., & Purcell, T. (1999). Unexpected discoveries and s-inventions of design requirements: a key to creative designs. In Computational Models of Creative Design IV (Gero, J.S., & Maher, M.L., Eds.), pp. 297-320. Sydney, Australia: Key Centre of Design. Computing and Cognition, University of Sydney.
30. Weber, M. (1968). Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. New York: Bedminster Press.
31. Wegner, D.M. (1986). Transactive memory: a contemporary analysis of the group mind. In Theories of Group Behavior (Mullen, B., & Goethals, G.R., Eds.), pp. 185-208. New York: Springer-Verlag.
32. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
33. Ziemke, T. (1999). Rethinking grounding. In Understanding Representation in the Cognitive Sciences: Does Representation Need. Reality? (Riegler, A., Peschl, M., & von Stein, A., Eds.), pp. 177-190. New York: Plenum Press.