Role of treatment with ovarian stimulation and intrauterine insemination in women with unilateral tubal occlusion diagnosed by hysterosalpingography

Fertility and Sterility

Volumn 88, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 396-400

  Farhi, Jacob ^a   Ben Haroush, Avi ^a   Lande, Yehezkel ^a   Fisch, Benjamin ^a  

^a Helen Schneider Hospital for Women   (Israel)

Author keywords

hysterosalpingography; intrauterine insemination; ovulation induction; pregnancy; Unilateral tubal factor infertility

Indexed keywords

CHORIONIC GONADOTROPIN; FOLLITROPIN; HUMAN MENOPAUSAL GONADOTROPIN; RECOMBINANT CHORIONIC GONADOTROPIN; RECOMBINANT FOLLITROPIN;

ARTICLE; CASE CONTROL STUDY; FEMALE; FEMALE INFERTILITY; FOLLITROPIN BLOOD LEVEL; HUMAN; HYSTEROSALPINGOGRAPHY; INTRAUTERINE INSEMINATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OVARY HYPERSTIMULATION; PREGNANCY RATE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SPERMATOZOON COUNT; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UTERINE TUBE OCCLUSION;

ADULT; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; FALLOPIAN TUBE DISEASES; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYSTEROSALPINGOGRAPHY; INFERTILITY, FEMALE; INSEMINATION, ARTIFICIAL, HOMOLOGOUS; OVULATION INDUCTION; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY RATE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 34547774573     PISSN: 00150282     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.11.187     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Lavy Y., Lev-Sagie A., Holtzer H., Revel A., and Hurwitz A. Should laparoscopy be a mandatory component of the infertility evaluation in infertile women with normal hysterosalpingogram or suspected unilateral distal tubal pathology?. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 114 (2004) 64-68
2. Mol B.W., Swart P., Bossuyt P.M., and van der Veen F. Prognostic significance of diagnostic laparoscopy for spontaneous fertility. J Reprod Med 44 (1999) 81-86
3. Keltz M.D., Gera P.S., and Moustakis M. Chlamydia serology screening in infertility patients. Fertil Steril 85 (2006) 752-754
4. Mol B.W., Collins J.A., Burrows E.A., van der Veen F., and Bossuyt P.M. Comparison of hysterosalpingography and laparoscopy in predicting fertility outcome. Hum Reprod 14 (1999) 1237-1242
5. Mol B.W., Swart P., Bossuyt P.M., and van der Veen F. Is hysterosalpingography an important tool in predicting fertility outcome?. Fertil Steril 67 (1997) 663-669
6. Dessole S., Meloni G.B., Capobianco G., Manzoni M.A., Ambrosini G., and Canalis G.C. A second hysterosalpingography reduces the use of selective technique for treatment of a proximal tubal obstruction. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 47 (1994) 99-108
7. Honore G.M., Holden A.E., and Schenken R.S. Pathophysiology and management of proximal tubal blockage. Fertil Steril 71 (1999) 785-795
8. Wadin K., Lonnemark M., Rasmussen C., and Magnusson A. Frequency of proximal tubal obstruction in patients undergoing infertility evaluation. Acta Radiol (Stockh) 35 (1994) 357-360
9. Scudamore I.W., Dunphy B.C., and Cooke I.D. Falloposcopic comparison of unilateral and bilateral proximal tubal occlusive disease. Hum Reprod 9 (1994) 340-342
10. Mossa B., Patella A., Ebano V., Pacifici E., Mossa S., and Marziani R. Microsurgery versus laparoscopy in distal tubal obstruction hysterosalpingographically or laparoscopically investigated. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 32 (2005) 169-171
11. Benadiva C.A., Kligman I., Davis O., and Rosenwaks Z. In vitro fertilization versus tubal surgery: is pelvic reconstructive surgery obsolete?. Fertil Steril 64 (1995) 1051-1061
12. Nichols K.P., and Steinkampf M.P. Tubal surgery vs. in vitro fertilization for the treatment of infertility due to distal tubal occlusion. Prim Care Update Obstet Gynecol 5 (1998) 168