Benefit-Cost Analysis, Individual Differences, and Third Parties

Research in Law and Economics

Volumn 23, Issue , 2007, Pages 67-86

  Goulder, Lawrence H ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34547765907     PISSN: 01935895     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1016/S0193-5895(07)23003-9     Document Type: Review

References (18)

1. Alberini A., Cropper M., Krupnick A., and Simon N. Does the value of statistical life vary with age and health status? Evidence from the U.S. and Canada. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 48 (2004) 769-792
2. Diamond P., and Hausman J. Contingent valuation: Is some number better than no number?. Journal of Economic Perspectives 8 4 (1994) 45-64
3. Hanemann W.M. Valuing the environment through contingent valuation. Journal of Economic Perspectives 8 4, fall (1994) 19-43
4. Itaoka, K., Krupnick, A., & Akai, M. (2005). Age, health, and the willingness to pay for mortality risk reductions: A contingent valuation survey in Japan. RFF Discussion Paper DP 05-34, August.
5. Kelman, S. (1981). Cost-benefit analysis: An ethical critique. Regulation, 33-40, January/February.
6. Krupnick A., Alberini A., Cropper M., Simon N., O'Brien B., Goeree R., and Heintzelman M. Age, health and the willingness to pay for mortality risk reductions: A contingent valuation study of Ontario residents. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 24 (2002) 161-186
7. Milgrom P. Is sympathy an economic value? Philosophy, economics, and the contingent valuation method. In: Hausman J. (Ed). Contingent valuation: A critical assesment (1993), North Holland, Amsterdam
8. Polinsky A.M. Probabilistic compensation criteria. Quarterly Journal of Economics 86 3 (1971) 407-425
9. Portney P. The contingent valuation debate: Why economists should care. Journal of Economic Perspectives 8 4 (1994) 3-17
10. Tol R.S.J. The damage costs of climate change: Toward more comprehensive calculations. Environmental and Resource Economics 5 (1995) 353-374
11. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (1997). The benefits and costs of the Clean Air Act 1970 to 1990, Office of Air and Radiation, Report to Congress October 1997.
12. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (1999). The benefits and costs of the Clean Air Act 1990 to 2010, Office of Air and Radiation, Report to Congress November 1999.
13. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2003). The Clear Skies Act of 2003. http://www.epa.gov/air/clearskies/fact2003.html
14. Viscusi, W. K., & Aldy, J. E. (2003). The value of a statistical life: A critical review of market estimates throughout the world. NBER Working Paper w9487, February 2003.
15. Zerbe Jr. R.O. Comment: Does benefit cost analysis stand alone? Rights and standing. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 10 1 (1991) 96-105
16. Zerbe Jr. R.O. Is cost-benefit analysis legal? Three rules. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 17 3 (1998) 419-456
17. Zerbe Jr. R.O. Can law and economics stand the purchase of moral satisfaction?. Research in Law and Economics 20 (2002)
18. Zerbe, R. O., Jr., Bauman, Y., & Finkle. A. (2006). An aggregate measure for benefit-cost analysis. Ecological Economics, forthcoming.