Stochastic interpretation of magnetotelluric data, comparison of methods

Annals of Geophysics

Volumn 50, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 7-19

  Červ, Václav ^a   Menvielle, Michel ^b,c   Pek, Josef ^a  

^a GEOPHYSICAL INSTITUTE   (Czech Republic)

^b SERVICE D AÉRONOMIE DU CNRS   (France)

^c UNIVERSITÉ PARIS SACLAY   (France)

Author keywords

Controlled random search; Inverse problem; Magnetotelluric method; Markov chain Monte Carlo; Neighbourhood algorithm

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; DATA INVERSION; INVERSE PROBLEM; MAGNETOTELLURIC METHOD; MARKOV CHAIN; MONTE CARLO ANALYSIS; OPTIMIZATION; PROBABILITY DENSITY FUNCTION; STOCHASTICITY;

EID: 34547765817     PISSN: 15935213     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. CONSTABLE, S.C., R.L. PARKER and C.G. CONSTABLE (1987): Occam's inversion: a practical algorithm for generating smooth models from EM sounding data, Geophysics, 52, 289-300.
2. GELMAN, A., J.B. CARLIN, H.S. STERN and D.B. RUBIN (1995): Bayesian Data Analysis (Chapman & Hall, New York), pp. 552.
3. GRANDIS, H., M. MENVIELLE and M. ROUSSIGNOL (1999): Bayesian inversion with Markov chains, I. The magnetotelluric one-dimensional case, Geophys. J. Int., 138, 757-768.
4. JONES, A.G. and R. HUTTON (1979a): A multi-station magnetotelluric study in Southern Scotland, I. Fieldwork, data analysis and results, Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc., 56, 329-349.
5. JONES, A.G. and R. HUTTON (1979b): A multi-station magnetotelluric study in Southern Scotland, II. Monte-Carlo inversion of the data and its geophysical and tectonic implication, Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc., 56, 351-358.
6. MALINVERNO, A. (2002): Parsimonious Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo inversion in a nonlinear geophysical problem, Geophys. J. Int., 151, 675-688.
7. MEJU, M.A. and V.R.S. HUTTON (1992): Iterative most-squares inversion: application to magnetotelluric data, Geophys. J. Int., 108, 758-766.
8. MENKE, W. (1989): Geophysical Data Analysis: Discrete Inverse Theory (Academic Press, London), 2nd edition, pp. 289.
9. MONTAZ, A., A. TORN and S. VIITANEN (1997): A numerical comparison of some modified controlled random search algorithms, TUCS Technical Report No. 98.
10. MOSEGAARD, K. and A. TARANTOLA (1995): Monte Carlo sampling of solutions to inverse problems, J. Geophys. Res., 100, 12431-12447.
11. PORTNIAGUINE, O. and M.S. ZHDANOV (1999): Focusing geophysical inversion images, Geophysics, 64, 874-887.
12. POUS, J., X. LANA and A.M. CORREIG (1985): Generation of Earth stratified models compatible with both ellipticity and phase velocity observations of Rayleigh waves, Pure Appl. Geophys., 123, 870-881.
13. PRICE, W.L. (1977): A controlled random search procedure for global optimization, Computer J., 20, 367-370.
14. SAMBRIDGE, M. (1999a): Geophysical inversion with a neighbourhood algorithm, I. Searching a parameter space, Geophys. J. Int., 138, 479-494.
15. SAMBRIDGE, M. (1999b): Geophysical inversion with neighbourhood algorithm, II. Appraising the ensemble, Geophys. J. Int., 138, 727-746.
16. SENN, M.K. and P.L. STOFFA (1995): Global optimization methods in geophysical inversion, Advances in Exploration Geophysics (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 4, pp. 294.
17. TVRDÍK, J., L. MIŠÍK and I. KŘIVÝ (2002): Competing heuristics in evolutionary algorithms, in Intelligent Technologies: from Theory to Applications, edited by P. SINCÁK, V. KVASNICKA, J. VASCÁK and J. POSPÍCHAL (IOS Press, Amsterdam), 159-165.
18. WEAVER, J.T. and A.K. AGARWAL (1993): Automatic 1D inversion of magnetotelluric data by the method of modelling, Geophys. J. Int., 112, 115-123.