메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 24, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 61-66

Strategy of the review

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords


EID: 34547764015     PISSN: 14406381     EISSN: 17416612     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-6612.2005.00075.x     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (3)

References (16)
  • 1
    • 84869041964 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 14 September 2004, Perth, Western Australia. Economics Discussion Paper 04.19. Perth: University of Western Australia, 2004.
    • Hogan WP. 'Policy Themes from Aged Care': 2004 Shann Memorial Lecture (14 September 2004, Perth, Western Australia). Economics Discussion Paper 04.19. Perth: University of Western Australia, 2004.
    • (2004) 'Policy Themes from Aged Care': Shann Memorial Lecture
    • Hogan, W.P.1
  • 4
    • 84869059321 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Department of Health and Ageing. Background paper No. 1 Review of Pricing Arrangements in Residential Aged Care. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia
    • Department of Health and Ageing. The Content of the Review; Background paper No. 1: Review of Pricing Arrangements in Residential Aged Care. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia, 2003.
    • (2003) The Content of the Review
  • 5
    • 84924666074 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Department of Health and Ageing. Background Paper No. 2 Review of Pricing Arrangements in Residential Aged Care. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia
    • Department of Health and Ageing. The Commonwealth Legislative Framework, Background Paper No. 2: Review of Pricing Arrangements in Residential Aged Care. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia, 2003.
    • (2003) The Commonwealth Legislative Framework
  • 7
    • 84869030605 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Background Paper No 3, Review of Pricing Arrangements in Residential Aged Care. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia
    • Amies M. Long Term Aged Care: International Perspectives, Background Paper No. 3: Review of Pricing Arrangements in Residential Aged Care. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia, 2003.
    • (2003) Long Term Aged Care: International Perspectives
    • Amies, M.1
  • 9
    • 0005721901 scopus 로고
    • Aged and Community Care Service Development and Evaluation Reports No. 11. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service
    • Gregory RW. Review of the Structure of Nursing Home Funding Arrangements Stage 1; Aged and Community Care Service Development and Evaluation Reports No. 11. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service, 1993.
    • (1993) Review of the Structure of Nursing Home Funding Arrangements Stage 1
    • Gregory, R.W.1
  • 10
    • 0005721901 scopus 로고
    • Aged and Community Care Service Development and Evaluation Reports No. 12. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service
    • Gregory RW. Review of the Structure of Nursing Home Funding Arrangements Stage 2; Aged and Community Care Service Development and Evaluation Reports No. 12. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service, 1994.
    • (1994) Review of the Structure of Nursing Home Funding Arrangements Stage 2
    • Gregory, R.W.1
  • 11
    • 0004026618 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • National Commission of Audit. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service
    • National Commission of Audit. Report to the Commonwealth Government. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service, 1996.
    • (1996) Report to the Commonwealth Government
  • 12
    • 34447625712 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Productivity Commission. Inquiry Report; Canberra: Ausinfo
    • Productivity Commission. Nursing Home Subsidies; Inquiry Report; Canberra: Ausinfo, 1999.
    • (1999) Nursing Home Subsidies
  • 15
    • 84869064367 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Aged Care Evaluation and Management Advisors (ACEMA). A report for the Department of Health and Ageing; Aged and Community Care Services Development and Evaluation Reports, No. 43, February
    • Aged Care Evaluation and Management Advisors (ACEMA). Resident Classification Scale Review, A report for the Department of Health and Ageing; Aged and Community Care Services Development and Evaluation Reports, No. 43, February 2003; 87.
    • (2003) Resident Classification Scale Review , pp. 87


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.