The use of cyclododecane as a temporary barrier for water-sensitive ink on archaeological ceramics during desalination

Journal of The American Institute for Conservation

Volumn 43, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 75-89

  Muros, Vanessa ^a   Hirx, John ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^b Los Angeles County Museum of Art   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34547762565     PISSN: 01971360     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/3179852     Document Type: Review

References (18)

1. Bandow, C. 1999. Cyclododecan in der Papierrestaurierung. Restauro 5:314-19
2. Blüher, A., A. Haverditzel, and T. Wimmer. 1999. Aqueous conservation treatment of 20th century papers containing water-sensitive inks and dyes. Restaurator 20:181-97
3. Brückle, I., J. Thornton, K. Nichols, and G. Strickler. 1999. Cylcododecane: Technical note on some uses in paper and objects conservation. Journal of the American Institute for Conservation 38:162-75
4. Buys, S., and V. Oakley. 1993. The conservation and restoration of ceramics. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann
5. Caspi, S., and E. Kaplan. 2001. Dilemmas in transporting unstable ceramics: A look at cyclododecane. In Objects Specialty Group Postprints, vol. 8, 2001, ed.V. Greene and L. Bruno. Washington D.C.: American Institute for Conservation of Historic and Artistic Works. 116-35
6. Forbes, R.J. 1965. Studies in ancient technology, vol. 3. Leiden: E.J. Brill
7. Hangleiter, H. M. 1998. Erfahrungen mit flüchtigen Bindemitteln. Restauro 5:314-19
8. Hangleiter, H. M. 1999. Volatile binding media. www.hangleiter.com/ Bindemittel/e-binde-frameset.htm (accessed October 2002)
9. Hiby, G. 1997. Das flüchtige Bindemittel Cyclododecan. Restauro 2:96-103
10. Jäegers, E., and E. Jäegers. 1999. Volatile binding media: Useful tools for conservation. In Reversibility: Does it exist? British Museum occasional paper no. 135, ed. A. Oddy and S. Carroll. London: British Museum Press. 37-42
11. Koob, S. P. 1991. The use of Acryloid B-72 in the treatment of archaeological ceramics: Minimal intervention. In Material issues in art and archaeology, II. Materials Research Society Symposium Proceedings vol. 185, ed. P. B. Vandiver et al. Pittsburgh: Materials Research Society. 591-96
12. Kumar, R., and W. S. Ginell. 1997. A new technique for determining the depth of penetration of consolidants into limestone using iodine vapor. Journal of the American Institute for Conservation 36: 143-50
13. Maish, J. P., and E. Risser. 2002. A case study in the use of cyclododecane and latex rubber in the molding of marble. Journal of the American Institute for Conservation 41: 127-38
14. Riedl, N., and G. Hilbert. 1998. Cyclododecan in Putzgefüge. Restauro 7:494-99
15. Singer, C., E.J. Holmyard, and A. R. Hall. 1965. A history of technology. Vol. 1: From early times to the fall of ancient empires. Oxford: Clarendon Press
16. Stanley, T. 1998. A tool for pressure sensitive tape removal: The AirPencil. The Book and Paper Group Annual, vol. 17. http://aic.stanford.edu/ conspec/bpg/annual/v17/bp17-16.html (accessed October 2002)
17. Stein, R., J. Kimmel, M. Marincola, and F. Klemm. 2000. Observations on cyclododecane as a temporary consolidant for stone. Journal of the American Institute for Conservation 39: 355-69
18. Strahan, D. K. 1996. Preserving unstable painted surfaces on freshly excavated terracotta: Dilemmas and decisions. In Archaeological conservation and its consequences, ed. A. Roy and P. Smith. London: International Institute for Conservation of Historic and Artistic Works. 172-76