Circuit motifs for spatial orientation behaviors identified by neural network optimization

Journal of Neurophysiology

Volumn 98, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 888-897

  Dunn, N A ^a   Conery, J S ^a   Lockery, S R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OREGON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; BRAIN NERVE CELL; CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS; MEMBRANE STEADY POTENTIAL; NEMATODE; NERVE CELL NETWORK; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSORY NERVE CELL; SPATIAL ORIENTATION; SYNAPTIC TRANSMISSION;

ACTION POTENTIALS; ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS; EXPLORATORY BEHAVIOR; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; NERVE NET; NEURAL NETWORKS (COMPUTER); NEURONS; ORIENTATION; SPATIAL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 34547755862     PISSN: 00223077     EISSN: 15221598     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00074.2007     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Bargmann C, Horvitz H. Chemosensory neurons with overlapping functions direct chemotaxis to multiple chemicals in C. elegans. Neuron 7: 729-742, 1991.
2. Beer R. On the dynamics of small continuous-time recurrent neural networks. Adapt Behav 3: 469-509, 1995.
3. Beer R. Parameter space structure of continuous-time recurrent neural networks. Neural Comp 18: 3009-3051, 2006.
4. Block S, Segall J, Berg H. Impulse responses in bacterial chemotaxis. Cell 31: 516-526, 1982.
5. Chalfie M, Sulston J, White J, Southgate E, Thomson J, Brenner S. The neural circuit for touch sensitivity in C. elegans. J Neurosci 5: 956-964, 1985.
6. Chang A, Chronis N, Karow D, Marletta M, Bargmann C. A distributed chemosensory circuit for oxygen preference in C. elegans. PLoS Biol 4: e274, 2006.
7. Cheung B, Cohen M, Rogers C, Albayram O, de Bono M. Experience-dependent modulation of C. elegans behavior by ambient oxygen. Cur Biol 15: 905-917, 2005.
8. Chiel HJ, Beer RD, Gallagher JC. Evolution and analysis of model CPGs for walking. I. Dynamical modules. J Comput Neurosci 7: 99-118, 1999.
9. Chow TWS, Li XD. Modeling of continuous time dynamical systems with input by recurrent neural networks. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst Fund Theory Appl 47: 575-578, 2000.
10. Chung SH, Clark DA, Gabel CV, Mazur E, Samuel AD. The role of the AFD neuron in C. elegans thermotaxis analyzed using femtosecond laser ablation. BMC Neurosci 7:30, 2006.
11. Clifford CWG, Ibbotson MR. Fundamental mechanisms of visual motion detection: models, cells and functions. Prog Neurobiol 68: 409-437, 2002.
12. Culotti J, Russell R. Osmotic avoidance defective mutants of the nematode C. elegans. Genetics 90: 243-256, 1978.
13. Davis RE, Stretton AOW. Signaling properties of Ascaris motorneurons: graded active response, graded synaptic transmission, and tonic transmitter release. J Neurosci 9: 415-425, 1989.
14. Dowling JE, Werblin FS. Organization of retina of the mudpuppy, Necturus maculosus. I. Synaptic structure. J Neurophysiol 32: 315-338, 1969.
15. Dunn NA, Conery JS, Pierce-Shimomura JT, Lockery SR. A neural network model of chemotaxis predicts functions of synaptic connections in the nematode C. elegans. J Comput Neurosci 17: 137-147, 2004.
16. Dusenbery D. Responses of the nematode C. elegans to controlled chemical stimulation. J Comp Physiol 136: 127-331, 1980.
17. Fetz E. Dynamic neural network models of sensorimotor behavior. In: The Neurobiology of Neural Networks, edited by Gardner D. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1993, p. 165-190.
18. Funahashi K, Nakamura Y. Approximation of dynamical systems by continuous time recurrent neural networks. Neural Networks 6: 801-806, 1993.
19. Goodman M, Hall D, Avery L, Lockery S. Active currents regulate sensitivity and dynamic range in C. elegans neurons. Neuron 20: 763-772, 1998.
20. Gray JM, Hill JJ, Bargmann CI. Inaugural article: a circuit for navigation in C. elegans. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102: 3184-3191, 2005.
21. Gray J, Karow D, Lu H, Chang A, Chang J, Ellis R, Marletta M, Bargmann C. Oxygen sensation and social feeding mediated by a C. elegans guanylate cyclase homologue. Nature 430: 317-322, 2004.
22. Hedgecock E, Russell R. Normal and mutant thermotaxis in the nematode C. elegans. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 72: 4061-4065, 1975.
23. Hopfield JJ. Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 79: 2554-2258, 1982.
24. Ito H, Inada H, Mori I. Quantitative analysis of thermotaxis in the nematode C elegans. J Neurosci Methods 154: 45-52, 2006.
25. Kimura M, Nakano R. Learning dynamical systems by recurrent neural networks from orbits. Neural Networks 11: 1589-1599, 1998.
26. Luo L, Clark D, Biron D, Mahadevan L, Samuel A. Sensorimotor control during isothermal tracking in C. elegans. J Exp Biol, 209: 4652- 4662, 2006.
27. Machemer H. Cellular behaviour modulated by ions: Electrophysiological implications. J Protozool 36: 463-487, 1989.
28. Masters T. Practical Neural Network Recipes in C++. New York: Morgan Kaufmann, 1993.
29. Miller A, Thiele T, Faumont S, Moravec M, Lockery S. Step-response analysis of chemotaxis in C. elegans. J Neurosci 25: 3369-3378, 2005.
30. Milo R, Shen-Orr S, Itzkovitz S, Kashtan N, Chklovskii D, Alon U. Network motifs: simple building blocks of complex networks. Science, 298: 824-827, 2002.
31. Mori I, Ohshima Y. Neural regulation of thermotaxis in C. elegans. Nature 376: 344-348, 1995.
32. Munro E, Shupe L, Fetz E. Integration and differentiation in dynamical recurrent neural networks. Neural Comput 6: 405-419, 1994.
33. Pierce-Shimomura J, Morse T, Lockery S. The fundamental role of pirouettes in C. elegans chemotaxis. J Neurosci 19: 9557-9569, 1999.
34. Press W, Teukolsky S, Vetterling W, Flannery B. Numerical Recipes in C (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge, 1992.
35. Rogers C, Persson A, Cheung B, de Bono M. Behavioral motifs and neural pathways coordinating O2 responses and aggregation in C. elegans. Curr Bio 16: 649-659, 2006.
36. Ryu WS, Samuel AD. Thermotaxis in C. elegans analyzed by measuring responses to defined thermal stimuli. J Neurosci 22: 5727-5733, 2002.
37. Sambongi Y, Nagae T, Liu Y, Yoshimizu T, Takeda K, Wada Y, Futai M. Sensing of cadmium and copper ions by externally exposed ADL, ASE, and ASH neurons elicits avoidance response in C. elegans. Neuroreport 10: 753-757, 1999.
38. Smolen P, Baxter D, Byrne J. Modeling circadian oscillations with interlocking positive and negative feedback loops. J Neurosci 21: 6644-6656, 2001.
39. Sontag E, Kiyatkin A, Kholodenko B. Inferring dynamic architecture of cellular networks using time series of gene expression, protein and metabolite data. Bioinformatics 20: 1877-1886, 2004.
40. Suzuki H, Kerr R, Bianchi L, Jensen C, Slone D, Xue J, Gerstbrein B, Driscoll M, Schafer W. In vivo imaging of C. elegans mechanosensory neurons demonstrates a specific role for the mec-4 channel in the process of gentle touch sensation. Neuron 39: 1005-1017, 2003.
41. Tsalik L, Hobert O. Functional mapping of neurons that control locomotory behavior in C. elegans. J Neurobiol 56: 178-197, 2003.
42. Wadhams GH, Armitage JP. Making sense of it all: Bacterial chemotaxis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 5: 1024-1037, 2004.
43. Ward S. Chemotaxis by the nematode C. elegans: identification of attractants and analysis of the response by use of mutants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 70: 817-821, 1973.
44. Ward S. Nematode chemotaxis and chemoreceptors. In: Taxis and Behavior, edited by Hazelbauer G. London: Chapman and Hall, 1978, p. 141-168.
45. Ward S, Thomson N, White JG, Brenner S. Electron microscopical reconstruction of the anterior sensory anatomy of the nematode C. elegans. J Comp Neurol 160: 313-338, 1975.
46. Werblin FS, Dowling JE. Organization of the retina of the mudpuppy, Necturus maculosus. II. Intracellular recording. J Neurophysiol 32: 339-355, 1969.
47. White JG, Southgate E, Thomson JN, Brenner S. The structure of the nervous system of the nematode C. elegans. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci, 314: 1-340, 1986.
48. Zariwala Z, Miller A, Faumont S, Lockery S. Step response analysis of thermotaxis in C. elegans. J Neurosci 23: 4369-4377, 2003.
49. Zheng Y, Brockie PJ, Mellem JE, Madsen DM, Maricq AV. Neuronal control of locomotion in C. elegans is modified by a dominant mutation in the glr-1 ionotropic glutamate receptor. Neuron 24: 347-361, 1999.