Use of contextualized attention metadata for ranking and recommending learning objects

Proceedings of CAMA 2006: 1st International ACM Workshop on Contextualized Attention Metadata: Collecting, Managing and Exploiting of Rich Usage Information

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 9-15

  Ochoa, Xavier ^a   Duval, Erik ^b  

^a ESCUELA SUPERIOR POLITÉCNICA DEL LITORAL   (Ecuador)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Attention metadata; Learning objects; Ranking; Recommending

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SOFTWARE; DIGITAL LIBRARIES; METADATA; SCALABILITY; TELECOMMUNICATION LINKS;

ATTENTION METADATA; LEARNING OBJECTS; RECOMMENDING;

LEARNING SYSTEMS;

EID: 34547699521     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1183604.1183608     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (33)

1. Linden, G.; Smith, B. and York, J. Amazon.com Recommendations: Item-to-Item Collaborative Filtering. IEEE Internet Computing, 7, 1 (2003), 76-80.
2. Shepherd, M.; Watters, C. and Marath, A. Adaptive User Modeling for Filtering Electronic News. In Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2002. HICSS. (2002), 1180-1188.
3. James, S. Outfoxed Collaborative Browsing, http://www.getoutfoxed.com. Retrieved on May, 2006.
4. Najjar, J., Meire, M. and Duval, E. Attention Metadata Management: Tracking the use of Learning Objects through Attention.XML. In Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications. (2005). 1157-1161.
5. Najjar, J., Wolpers, M. and Duval, E., Attention Metadata:Collection and Management", WWW2006 workshop on Logging Traces of Web Activity, Edinburgh, Scotland, (2006).
6. AttentionXML, AttentionXML specifications, http://developers.technorati. com/wiki/attentionxml. Retrieved on June, 2006
7. Duval, E. and Hodgins, W., A LOMresearch agenda. In Proceedings of WWW2003: Twelfth International World Wide Web Conference, (2003), 659-667.
8. Ochoa, X. Learning Object Repositories are Useful, but are they Usable? In Proceedings of IADIS International Conference Applied Computing. (2005), 138-144
9. Duval, E. LearnRank: the Real Quality Measure for Learning Materials. Policy and Innovation in Education - Quality Criteria, (2005)
10. Aizawa, A. An information-theoretic perspective of tf-idf measures. Information Processing and Management, 39, (2003), 45-65.
11. ISO/IEC JTC1 SC36. International LOM Survey: Report. http://mdlet. jtc1sc36.org/doc/SC36_WG4_N0109.pdf (2004).
12. Ariadne Foundation. Ariadne Foundation. http://www.ariadne-eu.org (2005).
13. Collis, B. and Strijker, A. Technology and Human Issues in Reusing Learning Objects. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 4, (2004).
14. Verbert, K. Jovanovic, J. Gaševic, D. and Duval, E. Repurposing Learning Object Components. OTM 2005 Workshop on Ontologies, Semantics and E-Learning, (2005).
15. IEEE-LOM Editor, http://www-i5.informatik.rwth-aachen.de/i5new/staff/ chatti/LOMEditor/index.html. Retrieved June 2006.
16. Cardinels, K., Meire, M., and Duval, E. Automating metadata generation: the simple indexing interface. In Proceedings of the 14th WWW conference, (2005), 548-556
17. Dalziel, J. Implementing Learning Design: The Learning Activity Management System (LAMS), ASCILITE (2003)
18. ADL, SCORM Standard, http://www.adlnet.gov/index.cfm, Retrieved March, 2006
19. IEEE. IEEE Standard for Learning Object Metadata. http://ltsc.ieee.org/ doc/wg12/ (2002).
20. Page, L., Brin, S., Motwani, R. and Winograd, T. The PageRank Citation Ranking: Bringing order to the Web. Technical Report, Computer Science Department, Stanford University (1998)
21. Google Technology, http://www.google.com/technology/. Retrieved, August 2006.
22. Radlinski, F. and Joachims, T. Query Chains: Learning to Rank from Implicit Feedback, Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. (2005).
23. Fan, W., Gordon, M. and Pathak, P. A generic ranking function discovery framework by genetic programming for information retrieval, Information Processing and Management. 40 (2004) 587-602
24. Nascimento, M., Sander, J. and Pound, J. Analysis of SIGMOD's co-authorship graph. ACM SIGMOD Record, 32, 3. (2003). 8-10
25. Girvan, M. and Newman, M. Community structure in social and biological networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 11. (2002).
26. Vivísimo Clustering Engine, http://www.vivisimo.com. Retrieved August 2006.
27. Pigeau, A., Raschia, G., Gelgon, M., Mouaddib, N. and Saint-Paul, R. A fuzzy linguistic summarization technique for TV recommender systems. The 12th IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, 2003. FUZZ '03.1 (2003) 743-748.
28. Google AdSense, https://www.google.com/adsense/. Retrieved August 2006.
29. Fan, W., Gordon, M. and Pathak, P. Incorporating contextual information in recommender systems using a multidimensional approach. Information Processing and Management. 40, 4. (2004). 587-602.
30. Blinkx Contextual Search, http://www.blinkx.com. Retrieved August 2006.
31. Sourceforge, Open Software Repository. http://www.sourceforge.net. Retrieved August 2006.
32. Broisin, J., Vidal, P. and Sibilla, M. A Management Framework Based On A Model Driven Approach For Tracking User Activities In A Web-Based Learning Environment. EDMEDIA, (2006) 896-903
33. Nicholson, S. The basis for bibliomining: Frameworks for bringing together sage-based data mining and bibliometrics through data arehousing in digital library services. Information Processing and Management. 42, 3 (2006). 785-804.