Web application testing with customized test requirements - An experimental comparison study

Proceedings - International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering, ISSRE

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 266-275

  Sampath, Sreedevi ^a   Sprenkle, Sara ^a   Gibson, Emily ^a   Pollock, Lori ^a  

^a University of Delaware   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PROGRAM COVERAGE; WEB APPLICATIONS;

DATA REDUCTION; FAULT DETECTION; SOFTWARE TESTING;

WORLD WIDE WEB;

EID: 34547699167     PISSN: 10719458     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ISSRE.2006.51     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. P. Ammann and J. Offutt. Introduction to Software Testing. In preparation, 2006.
2. A. Andrews, J. Offutt, and R. Alexander. Testing web applications by modeling with FSMs. Software and Systems Modeling, 4(3):326-345, July 2005.
3. J. H. Andrews, L. C. Briand, and Y. Labiche. Is mutation an appropriate tool for testing experiments? In International Conference on Software Engineering, 2005.
4. Clover: Code coverage tool for Java. http://www. cenqua.com/clover/, 2006.
5. Dspace federation. http://www.dspace.org/, 2006.
6. S. Elbaum, G. Rothermel, S. Karre, and M. Fisher II. Leveraging user session data to support web application testing. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 31(3):187-202, May 2005.
7. Open source web applications with source code. http://www.gotocode.com, 2006.
8. M. J. Harrold, R. Gupta, and M. L. Soffa. A methodology for controlling the size of a test suite. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology, 2(3):270-285, July 1993.
9. HTTPClient V0.3-3. http://www.innovation.ch/ java/HTTPClient/, 2006.
10. HttpUnit. http://httpunit.sourceforge.net, 2006.
11. Junit. http://www.junit.org, 2006.
12. C. Lindig. Concepts tool. http://www.st.es. uni-sb.de/~lindig/src/ concepts.html, 2006.
13. C-H. Liu, D. C. Kung, and P. Hsia. Object-based data flow testing of web applications. In The First Asia-Pacific Conference on Quality Software, 2000.
14. G. D. Lucca, A. Fasolino, F. Faralli, and U. D. Carlini. Testing web applications. In International Conference on Software Maintenance, 2002.
15. J. Offutt, Y. Wu, X. Du, and H. Huang. Bypass testing of web applications. In International Symposium on Software Reliability and Engineering, 2004.
16. R. L. Ott and M. Longnecker. An Introduction to Statistical Methods and Data Analysis. Duxbury, Fifth edition, 2001.
17. Parasoft WebKing. http://www.parasoft.com, 2004.
18. F. Ricca and P. Tonella. Analysis and testing of web applications. In International Conference on Software Engineering, 2001.
19. S. Sampath, V. Mihaylov, A. Souter, and L. Pollock. Composing a framework to automate testing of operational webbased software. In International Conference on Software Maintenance, 2004.
20. S. Sampath, V. Mihaylov, A. Souter, and L. Pollock. A scalable approach to user-session based testing of web applications through concept analysis. In International Conference on Automated Software Engineering, 2004.
21. S. Sampath, S. Sprenkle, E. Gibson, L. Pollock, and A. Souter. Analyzing clusters of web application user sessions. In Third International Workshop on Dynamic Analysis, May 2005.
22. S. Sampath, S. Sprenkle, E. Gibson, L. Pollock, and A. Souter. Applying concept analysis to user-session-based testing of web applications. Technical Report 2006-329, University of Delaware, 2006.
23. Web site test tools and site management tools. 〈http://www. softwareqatest.com/qatweb1.html〉, 2006.
24. S. Sprenkle, E. Gibson, S. Sampath, and L. Pollock. Automated replay and failure detection for web applications. In International Conference of Automated Software Engineering, 2005.
25. S. Sprenkle, S. Sampath, E. Gibson, L. Pollock, and A. Souter. An empirical comparison of test suite reduction techniques for user-session-based testing of web applications. In International Conference on Software Maintenance, 2005.