Assessment of care by breast cancer patients participating or not participating in a randomized controlled trial: A report with the patients' committee for clinical trials of the Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Volumn 25, Issue 21, 2007, Pages 3038-3044

  Julian Reynier, Claire ^a   Genève, Jean ^a   Dalenc, Florence ^a   Genre, Dominique ^a   Monnier, Alain ^a   Kerbrat, Pierre ^a   Largillier, Rémy ^a   Serin, Daniel ^a   Rios, Maria ^a   Roché, Henri ^a   Jimenez, Marta ^a   Tarpin, Carole ^a   Maraninchi, Dominique ^a  

^a AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITY   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE; DOCETAXEL; EPIRUBICIN; FLUOROURACIL;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMBINATION CHEMOTHERAPY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; DRUG SELF ADMINISTRATION; FEMALE; FRANCE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INFORMED CONSENT; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MULTICENTER STUDY; MULTIPLE CYCLE TREATMENT; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PHASE 3 CLINICAL TRIAL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TREATMENT REFUSAL;

ADULT; AGE FACTORS; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANTINEOPLASTIC COMBINED CHEMOTHERAPY PROTOCOLS; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CHEMOTHERAPY, ADJUVANT; EVALUATION STUDIES; FEMALE; FRANCE; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM STAGING; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PROBABILITY; PROGNOSIS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUESTIONNAIRES; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS; RISK ASSESSMENT; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TREATMENT REFUSAL;

EID: 34547698891     PISSN: 0732183X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2006.08.9367     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Peppercorn JM, Weeks JC, Cook EF, et al: Comparison of outcomes in cancer patients treated within and outside clinical trials: Conceptual framework and structured review. Lancet Jan 24363263-270, 2004
2. Vist GE, Hagen KB, Devereaux PJ, et al: Systematic review to determine whether participation in a trial influences outcome. Bmj 330:1175, 2005
3. Carr-Hill RA: The measurement of patient satisfaction. J Public Health Med Sep 14:236-249, 1992
4. Williams B: Patient satisfaction: A valid concept? Soc Sci Med 38:509-516, 1994
5. Williams B, Coyle J, Healy D: The meaning of patient satisfaction: An explanation of high reported levels. Soc Sci Med Nov 47:1351-1359, 1998
6. Staniszewska S, Henderson L: Patients evaluations of their health care: The expression of negative evaluation and the role of adaptive strategies. Patient Educ Couns 55:185-192, 2004
7. Bredart A, Bouleuc C, Dolbeault S: Doctor-patient communication and satisfaction with care in oncology. Curr Opin Oncol 17:351-354, 2005
8. Hendriks AA, Vrielink MR, van Es SQ, et al: Assessing inpatients' satisfaction with hospital care: Should we prefer evaluation or satisfaction ratings? Patient Educ Couns 55:142-146, 2004
9. Bonneterre J, Roche H, Kerbrat P, et al: Epirubicin increases long-term survival in adjuvant chemotherapy of patients with poor-prognosis, node-positive, early breast cancer: 10-year follow-up results of the French Adjuvant Study Group 05 randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 23:2686-2693, 2005
10. Zubrod C, Schneiderman M, Frei E: Appraisal of methods for the study of chemotherapy of cancer in man: Comparative therapeutic trial of nitrogen mustard an triethylene thiophosphoramide. J Chronic Dis 11:7-33, 1960
11. Fuhrer R, Rouillon F: French version of the CES-D (Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale): Description and transduction of the self-administered scale [French]. Psychiatrie et psychobiologie 4:163-166, 1989
12. Spielberger C: Assessment of state and trait anxiety: Conceptual and methodological issues. The Southern Psychologist 2:6-16, 1985
13. Micallef J, McGlangeaud-Freudenthal N, Aurran Y, et al: Measurement of anxiety state in women: A short-form scale. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique 46:383-389, 1998
14. Mancini J, Geneve J, Dalenc F, et al: Personal experience, decision making and cancer clinical trials: A prospective study. Contemporary Clincial Trials (in press)
15. Bredart A, Razavi D, Robertson C, et al: A comprehensive assessment of satisfaction with care: Preliminary psychometric analysis in French, Polish, Swedish and Italian oncology patients. Patient Educ Couns Jun 43:243-252, 2001
16. Bredart A, Robertson C, Razavi D, et al: Patients' satisfaction ratings and their desire for care improvement across oncology settings from France, Italy, Poland and Sweden. Psychooncology 12:68-77, 2003
17. Localio AR, Berlin JA, Ten Have TR, et al: Adjustments for center in multicenter studies: An overview. Ann Intern Med 135:112-123, 2001
18. Joffe S, Cook EF, Cleary PD, et al: Quality of informed consent: A new measure of understanding among research subjects. J Natl Cancer Inst 93:139-147, 2001
19. Steimes P, Edouard A, Monnot F, et al: Involving patients in clinical trial design. Appl Clin Trials 9:93-94, 1999
20. Schrag D: Communication and coordination: The keys to quality. J Clin Oncol 23:6452-6455, 2005
21. Bredart A, Razavi D, Robertson C, et al: A comprehensive assessment of satisfaction with care: Preliminary psychometric analysis in an oncology institute in Italy. Ann Oncol 10:839-846, 1999
22. Bredart A, Bottomley A, Blazeby JM, et al: An international prospective study of the EORTC cancer in-patient satisfaction with care measure (EORTC IN-PATSAT32). Eur J Cancer 41:2120-2131, 2005
23. Jenkins V, Fallowfield L: Reasons for accepting or declining to participate in randomized clinical trials for cancer therapy. Br J Cancer 82:1783-1788, 2000