The other-race effect in infancy: Evidence using a morphing technique

Infancy

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 95-104

  Hayden, Angela ^a   Bhatt, Ramesh S ^a   Joseph, Jane E ^b   Tanaka, James W ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF VICTORIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASIAN; CAUCASIAN; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISCRIMINATIVE STIMULUS; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN; FACE PROFILE; FEMALE; HABITUATION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGE DISPLAY; IMAGE PROCESSING; INFANT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; RACE DIFFERENCE; SPATIAL DISCRIMINATION;

EID: 34547673498     PISSN: 15250008     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-7078.2007.tb00235.x     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Bahrick, H. P., Bahrick, O. O., & Wittlinger, R. P. (1975). Fifty years of memory for names and faces: A cross-sectional approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104, 54-75.
2. Bar-Haim, Y., Ziv, T., Lamy, D., & Hodes, R. M. (2006). Nature and nurture in own-race face processing. Psychological Science, 17, 159-163.
3. Beale, J. M., & Keil, F. C. (1995). Categorical effects in the perception of faces. Cognition, 57, 217-239.
4. Bertin, E., & Bhatt, R. S. (2004). The Thatcher illusion and face processing in infancy. Developmental Science, 7, 431-436.
5. Bertin, E., & Bhatt, R. S. (2006). Three-month-old infants' sensitivity to orientation cues in the 3-D depth plane. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 93, 45-62.
6. Bhatt, R. S., Bertin, E., Hayden, A., & Reed, A. (2005). Face processing in infancy: Developmental changes in the use of different kinds of relational information. Child Development, 76, 169-181.
7. Busey, T. A. (1998). Physical and psychological representation of faces: Evidence from morphing. Psychological Science, 9, 476-483.
8. Caldara, R., & Abdi, H. (2006). Simulating the "other-race" effect with autoassociative neural networks: Further evidence in favor of the face-space model. Perception, 35, 659-670.
9. Carey, S. (1992). Becoming a face expert. Philosophical Transactions: Biological Sciences, 335, 95-102.
10. Chance, J. E., & Goldstein, A. G. (1996). The other-race effect and eyewitness identification. In S. L. Sporer, R. S. Malpass, & G. Koehnken (Eds.), Psychological issues in eyewitness identification (pp. 153-176). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
11. Chance, J., Turner, A., & Goldstein, A. (1982). Development of differential recognition of own- and other-race faces. Journal of Social Psychology, 97, 29-37.
12. Corenblum, B., & Meissner, C. A. (2006). Recognition of faces of ingroup and outgroup children and adults. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 83, 187-206.
13. Furl, N., Phillips, P. J., & O'Toole, A. J. (2002). Face recognition algorithms and the other-race effect: Computational mechanisms for a developmental contact hypothesis. Cognitive Science, 26, 797-815.
14. Goldstein, A. G., & Chance, J. E. (1976). Measuring psychological similarity of faces. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 7, 407-408.
15. Goldstein, A. G., & Chance, J. E. (1978). Judging face similarity in own and other races. Journal of Psychology, 98, 185-193.
16. Goldstein, A. G., & Chance, J. E. (1979). Do "foreign" faces really look alike? Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 13, 111-113.
17. Horowitz, F. D., Paden, L., Bhana, K., & Self, P. (1972). An infant-control procedure for studying infant visual fixation. Developmental Psychology, 7, 90.
18. Kelly, D. J., Liu, S., Ge, L., Quinn, P. C., Slater, A. M., Lee, K., et al. (2007). Cross-race preferences for same-race faces extend beyond the African versus Caucasian contrast in 3-month-old infants. Infancy, 11, 87-95.
19. Kelly, D. J., Quinn, P. C., Slater, A. M., Lee, K., Gibson, A., Smith, M., et al. (2005). Three-month-olds, but not newborns, prefer own-race faces. Developmental Science, 8, F31-F36.
20. Levin, D. T. (2000). Race as a visual feature: Using visual search and perceptual discrimination tasks to understand face categories and the cross-race recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 559-574.
21. Meissner, C. A., & Brigham, J. C. (2001). Thirty years of investigating the own-race bias in memory for faces: A meta-analytic review. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 7, 3-35.
22. Mondloch, C. J., Leis, A., & Maurer, D. (2006). Recognizing the face of Johnny, Suzy, and me: Insensitivity to the spacing among features at 4 years of age. Child Development, 77, 234-243.
23. Pascalis, O., de Haan, M., & Nelson, C. A. (2002). Is face processing species-specific during the first year of life? Science, 296, 1321-1323.
24. Quinn, P. C., Yahr, J., Kuhn, A., Slater, A. M., & Pascalis, O. (2002). Representation of the gender of human faces by infants: A preference for female. Perception, 31, 1109-1121.
25. Sangrigoli, S., & de Schonen, S. (2004a). Effect of visual experience on face processing: A developmental study of inversion and non-native effects. Developmental Science, 7, 74-87.
26. Sangrigoli, S., & de Schonen, S. (2004b). Recogntion of own-race and other-race faces by three-month-old infants. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45, 1219-1227.
27. Sangrigoli, S., Pallier, C., Argenti, A. M., Ventureyra, V. A. G., & de Schonen, S. (2005). Reversability of the other-race effect in face recogntion during childhood. Psychological Science, 16, 440-444.
28. Slone, A. E., Brigham, J. B., & Meissner, C. A. (2000). Social and cognitive factors affecting the own-race advantage in Whites. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 22, 71-84.
29. Tanaka, J. W., & Droucker, D. (2007). Behavioural plasticity and the other face effect in face recognition: A test of the perceptual expertise hypothesis. Under review.
30. Tanaka, J. W., Kiefer, M., & Bukach, C. M. (2004). A holistic account of the own-race effect in face recognition: Evidence from a cross-cultural study. Cogntion, 93, B1-B9.
31. Valentine, T. (1991). A unified account of the effects of distinctiveness, inversion, and race in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A, 43, 161-204.
32. Valentine, T., Chiroro, P., & Dixon, R. (1995). An account of the own-race bias and the contact hypothesis based on a "face space" model of face recognition. In T. Valentine (Ed.), Cognitive and computational aspects of face recognition: Explorations of face space (pp. 69-94). London: Routledge.
33. Walker, P. M., & Tanaka, J. W. (2003). An encoding advantage for own-race versus other-race faces. Perception, 32, 1117-1125.
34. Wright, D. B., Boyd, C. E., & Tredoux, C. G. (2001). A field study of own-race advantage in South Africa and England. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 7, 119-133.