Social support in couples: An examination of gender differences using self-report and observational methods

Sex Roles

Volumn 57, Issue 3-4, 2007, Pages 267-282

  Verhofstadt, Lesley L ^a   Buysse, Ann ^a   Ickes, William ^b  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT ARLINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

Gender differences; Marriage; Observational methods; Self report; Social support

Indexed keywords

EID: 34547673042     PISSN: 03600025     EISSN: 15732762     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11199-007-9257-6     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Aries, E. (1996). Men and women in interaction: Reconsidering the differences. New York: Oxford University Press.
2. Basow, S. A., & Rubenfeld, K. (2003). "Troubles talk": Effects of gender and gender-typing. Sex Roles, 48, 183-187.
3. Bate, B., & Bowker, J. (1997). Communication and the sexes (2nd ed.). Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland.
4. Beach, S. R. H., Martin, J. K., Blum, T. C., & Roman, P. M. (1993). Effects of marital and co-worker relationships on negative affect: Testing the central role of marriage. American Journal of Family Therapy, 21, 313-323.
5. Belle, D. (1982). The stress of caring: women as providers of social support. In L. Goldberger & S. Breznitz (Eds.), Handbook of stress: Theoretical and clinical aspects (pp. 496-505). New York: Free Press.
6. Bontempo, R. (1993). Translation fidelity of psychological scales: An item response theory analysis of an individualism-collectivism scale. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 24, 149-166.
7. Bradbury, T. N., & Karney, B. R. (2004). Understanding and altering the longitudinal course of marriage. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 66, 862-881.
8. Bradbury, T. N., & Pasch, L. A. (1994). The Social Support Interaction Coding System (SSICS). Unpublished coding manual, University of California, Los Angeles.
9. Burleson, B. R. (2003). The experience and effects of emotional support: What the study of cultural and gender differences can tell us about close relationships, emotion, and interpersonal communication. Personal Relationships, 10, 1-23.
10. Burleson, B. R., & Gilstrap, C. M. (2002). Explaining sex differences in interaction goals in support situations: Some mediating effects of expressivity and instrumentality. Communication Reports, 15, 43-55.
11. Burleson, B. R., & Kunkel, A.W. (2006). Revisiting the different cultures thesis: An Assessment of sex differences and similarities in supportive communication. In K. Dindia & D. J. Canary (Eds.), Sex differences and similarities in communication (2nd ed., pp. 137-159). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
12. Canary, D. J, & Emmers-Sommer, T. M. (1997). Sex and gender differences in personal relationships. New York: Guilford.
13. Canary, D. J., & Dindia, K. (1998). Sex differences and similarities in communication. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
14. Carels, R. A., & Baucom, D. H. (1999). Support in marriage: Factors associated with on-line perceptions of support helpfulness. Journal of Family Psychology, 13, 131-144.
15. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
16. Cohen, S., Gottlieb, B. H., & Underwood, L. G. (2000). Social relationships and health. In S. Cohen, B. H. Gottlieb, & L. G. Underwood (Eds.), Social support measurement and intervention: A guide for health and social scientists (pp. 3-28). New York: Oxford University Press.
17. Conger, R. D., Rueter, M. A., & Elder, G. H. (1999). Couple resilience to economic pressure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 54-71.
18. Coyne, J. C., & DeLongis, A. (1986). Going beyond social support: The role of social relationships in adaptation. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 54, 454-460.
19. Cutrona, C. E. (1996). Social support in couples. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20. Dakof, G. A., & Taylor, S. E. (1990). Victims' perception of social support: What is helpful for whom? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(1), 80-89.
21. De Clercq, A., Buysse, A., Roeyers, H., Ickes, W., Ponnet, K., & Verhofstadt, L. L. (2001). VIDANN: A video annotation system. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 33, 159-166.
22. Fletcher, G. J. O. (2002). The new science of intimate relationships. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
23. Fletcher, G. J. O., & Thomas, G. (2000). Behavior and on-line cognition in marital interaction. Personal Relationships, 7, 111-130.
24. Fontaine, R. J. (2005). Equivalence. In Encyclopedia of social measurement. (Vol 1) Amsterdam: Elsevier.
25. Goldsmith, D. J., & Dun, S. A. (1997). Sex differences and similarities in the communication of social support, Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 14, 317-337.
26. Gottman, J. M., & Notarius, C. I. (2000). Decade review: Observing marital interaction. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 927-947.
27. Harris, K. W. (2001). The psychophysiology of marital interaction: Differential effects of support and conflict. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Oregon, USA.
28. Hinde, R. (1997). Relationships: A dialectical perspective. East Sussex, England: Psychology Press.
29. Johnson, F. L. (2000). Speaking culturally: Language diversity in the United States. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
30. Jones, S. M., & Burleson, B. R. (2003). Effects of helper and recipient sex on the experience and outcomes of comforting messages: An experimental investigation. Sex Roles, 48, 1-19.
31. MacGeorge, E. L., Feng, B., & Butler, G. L. (2003). Gender differences in the communication values of mature adults. Communication Research Reports, 20, 191-199.
32. MacGeorge, E. L., Feng, B., Butler, G. L., Dane, J. L., & Passalacqua, S. A. (2005). Sex differences in goals for supportive interactions. Communication Studies, 56, 23-46.
33. MacGeorge, E. L., Graves, A. R., Feng, B., Gillihan, S. J., & Burleson, B. R. (2004). The myth of gender cultures: Similarities outweigh differences in men's and women's provision of and responses to supportive communication. Sex Roles, 50, 143-175.
34. Michaud, S. L., & Warner, R. M. (1997). Gender differences in self-reported response to troubles talk. Sex Roles, 37, 527-540.
35. Neff, L. A., & Karney, B. R. (2005). Gender differences in social support: A question of skill or responsiveness? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 79-90.
36. Pasch, L. A., & Bradbury, T. N. (1998). Social support, conflict, and the development of marital dysfunction. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 219-230.
37. Pasch, L. A., Bradbury, T. N., & Davila, J. (1997a). Gender, negative affectivity, and observed social support behavior in marital interaction. Personal Relationships, 4, 361-378.
38. Pasch, L. A., Bradbury, T. N., & Sullivan, K. T. (1997b). Social support in marriage: An analysis of intraindividual and interpersonal components. In G. R. Pierce, B. Lakey, I. G. Sarason, & B. R. Sarason (Eds.), Sourcebook of social support and personality (pp. 229-256). New York: Plenum.
39. Pasch, L. A., Harris, K. W., Sullivan, K. T., & Bradbury, T. N. (2004). The social support interaction coding system. In P. Kerig & D. Baucom (Eds.), Couple observational coding systems (pp. 319-334). New York: Guilford.
40. Pierce, G. R., Sarason, I. G., & Sarason, B. R. (1991). General and relationship-based perceptions of social support: Are two constructs better than one? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 1028-1039.
41. Reis, H. T., & Collins, N. (2000). Measuring relationship properties and interactions relevant to social support. In S. Cohen, L. G. Underwood, & B. H. Gottlieb (Eds.), Social support measurement and intervention: A guide for health and social scientists (pp. 136-194). New York: Oxford University Press.
42. Roberts, L. J., & Greenberg, D. R. (2002). Observational "windows" to intimacy processes in marriage. In P. Noller & J. A. Feeney (Eds.), Understanding marriage: Developments in the study of couple interaction (pp. 118-149). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
43. Saitzyk, A. R., Floyd, F. J., & Kroll, A. B. (1997). Sequential analysis of autonomy-interdependence and affiliation-disaffiliation in couples' social support interactions. Personal Relationships, 4, 341-360.
44. Sarason, I. G., Sarason, B. R., & Pierce, G. R. (1994). Social support: Global and relationship-based levels of analysis. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 11, 295-312.
45. Schwarz, N., Groves, R. M., & Schuman, H. (1998). Survey methods. In D. T. Gilbert, S. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., vol. 2, pp. 143-179). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
46. Sillars, A., Roberts, L. J., Leonard, K. E., & Dun, T. (2000). Cognition during marital conflict: The relationship between thought and talk. Journal of Social and Personal relationships, 17, 479-502.
47. Spanier, G. (1976). Measuring dyadic adjustment: New scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 38, 15-28.
48. Steil, J. M. (2000). Contemporary marriage: Still an unequal partnership. In C. Hendrick & S. S. Hendrick (Eds.), Close relationships: A sourcebook (pp. 124-136). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
49. Tannen, D. (1990). You just don't understand: Men and women in conversation. New York: Ballentine Books.
50. Thoits, P. A. (1991). Gender differences in coping with emotional distress. In J. Eckenrode (Ed.), The social context of coping (pp. 107-138). New York: Plenum.
51. Van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Leung, K. (1997). Methods and data analysis for cross-cultural research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
52. Verhofstadt, L. L. (2005). Conflict and social support: An interactional analysis within couples. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Ghent University, Belgium.
53. Verhofstadt, L. L., & Buysse, A. (2006). Mannen en vrouwen in interactie: Een kijk op gelijkenissen en verschillen vanuit relatieonderzoek. (Spouses in interaction: What can relationship research tell us about gender similarities and differences?) Verslagen van het Centrum voor Genderstudies, 15, 5-22.
54. Verhofstadt, L. L., Buysse, A., De Clercq, A., & Goodwin, R. (2005a). Emotional arousal and negative affect in marital conflict: The influence of gender, conflict structure, and demand-withdrawal. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 449-467.
55. Verhofstadt, L. L., Buysse, A., Devoldre, I., & De Corte, K. (2007). The influence of personal characteristics and relationship properties on social support in marriage. Manuscript accepted for publication in Psychologica Belgica.
56. Verhofstadt, L. L., Buysse, A., Ickes, W., De Clercq, A., & Peene, O. J. (2005b). Conflict and support interactions in marriage: An analysis of couples' interactive behavior and on-line cognition. Personal Relationships, 12, 23-42.
57. Verhofstadt, L. L., Buysse, A., Rosseel, Y., & Peene, O. J. (2006). Confirming the three-factor structure of the Quality of Relationships Inventory within couples. Psychological Assessment, 18, 15-21.
58. Wills, T. A., & Shinar, O. (2000). Measuring perceived and received social support. In S. Cohen, L. G. Underwood, & B. H. Gottlieb (Eds.), Social support measurement and intervention: A guide for health and social scientists (pp. 86-135). New York: Oxford University Press.
59. Wood, J. T. (1996). She says/he says: communication, caring, and conflict in heterosexual relationships. In J. T. Wood (Ed.), Gendered relationships (pp. 149-164). Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.
60. Wood, J. T. (2000). Relational culture: The nucleus of intimacy. In J. T. Wood (Ed.), Relational communication: Continuity and change in personal relationships (2nd ed., pp. 76-100). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
61. Wood, J. T., & Dindia, K. (1998). What's the difference? A dialogue about differences and similarities between women and men. In D. J. Canary & K. Dindia (Eds.), Sex differences and similarities in communication (pp. 19-39). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
62. Xu, Y., & Burleson, B. R. (2001). Effects of sex, culture, and support type on perceptions, of spousal social support: An assessment of the « Support Gap » hypothesis in early marriage. Human Communication Research, 27, 535-566.