Risk reporting by the largest UK companies: Readability and lack of obfuscation

Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 620-627

  Linsley, Philip M ^a   Lawrence, Michael J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HULL   (United Kingdom)

^b Merck Sharp & Dohme Limited   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Annual reports; Companies; Disclosure; Risk analysis; United Kingdom

Indexed keywords

EID: 34547664696     PISSN: 09513574     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/09513570710762601     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Baker, H.E. III and Kare, D.D. (1992), "Relationship between annual report readability and corporate financial performance", Management Research News, Vol. 15, pp. 1-4.
2. Courtis, J.K. (1986), "An investigation into annual report readability and corporate risk-return relationships", Accounting and Business Research, Vol. 16 No. 64, pp. 285-94.
3. Courtis, J.K. (1995), "Readability of annual reports: western versus Asian evidence", Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 8 No. 2, pp. 4-17.
4. Courtis, J.K. (1998), "Annual report readability variability: tests of the obfuscation hypothesis", Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, Vol. 11 No. 4, pp. 459-71.
5. Courtis, J.K. (2004), "Corporate report obfuscation: artefact or phenomenon?", The British Accounting Review, Vol. 36 No. 3, pp. 291-312.
6. Flesch, R. (1948), "A new readability yardstick", Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 32 No. 3, pp. 221-33.
7. Hackston, D. and Milne, M.J. (1996), "Some determinants of social and environmental disclosures in New Zealand companies", Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 9 No. 1, pp. 77-108.
8. Ingram, R.W. and Frazier, K.B. (1983), "Narrative disclosures in annual reports", Journal of Business Research, Vol. 11, pp. 49-60.
9. Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales (1998), Financial Reporting of Risk - Proposals for a Statement of Business Risk, ICAEW, London.
10. Jones, M.J. (1988), "A longitudinal study of the readability of the chairman's narratives in the corporate reports of a UK company", Accounting and Business Research, Vol. 18 No. 72, pp. 297-305.
11. Jones, M.J. and Shoemaker, P.A. (1994), "Accounting narratives: a review of empirical studies of content and readability", Journal of Accounting Literature, Vol. 13, pp. 142-84.
12. Klare, G.R. (1974-1975), "Assessing readability", Reading Research Quarterly, Vol. X No. 1, pp. 62-102.
13. Linsley, P.M. and Shrives, P.J. (2005a), "Examining risk reporting in UK public companies", The Journal of Risk Finance, Vol. 6 No. 4, pp. 292-305.
14. Linsley, P.M. and Shrives, P.J. (2005b), "Transparency and the disclosure of risk information in the banking sector", Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance, Vol. 13 No. 3, pp. 205-14.
15. Pashalian, S. and Crissy, W.J.E. (1952), "Corporate annual reports are difficult, dull reading, human interest value low, survey shows", Journal of Accountancy, August, pp. 215-9.
16. Smith, M. and Taffler, R. (1992), "Readability and understandability: different measures of the textual complexity of accounting narrative", Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 5 No. 4, pp. 84-98.
17. Smith, M. and Taffler, R. (1995), "The Incremental effect of narrative accounting information in corporate annual reports", Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, Vol. 22 No. 8, pp. 1195-210.
18. Solomon, J.F., Solomon, A., Norton, S.D. and Joseph, N.L. (2000), "A conceptual framework for corporate risk disclosure emerging from the agenda for corporate governance reform", British Accounting Review, Vol. 32 No. 4, pp. 447-78.
19. Subramanian, R., Insley, R.G. and Blackwell, R.D. (1993), "Performance and readability: a comparison of annual reports of profitable and unprofitable companies", The Journal of Business Communication, Vol. 30 No. 1, pp. 49-61.