Visualizing testsuites to aid in software understanding

Proceedings of the European Conference on Software Maintenance and Reengineering, CSMR

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 213-222

  Cornelissen, Bas ^a   Van Deursen, Arie ^a   Moonen, Leon ^a   Zaidman, Andy ^a  

^a DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABSTRACTION TECHNIQUES; SEQUENCE DIAGRAMS; SOFTWARE SYSTEMS; STACK DEPTH LIMITATION;

COMPUTER PROGRAMMING; SOFTWARE TESTING; SYSTEM PROGRAM DOCUMENTATION;

SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

EID: 34547657373     PISSN: 15345351     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/CSMR.2007.54     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (34)

1. AspectJ: The AspectJ project at Eclipse.org, http://www. eclipse.org/aspectj/.
2. InsectJ: A generic instrumentation framework for collecting dynamic information within Eclipse, http://insectj.sourceforge.net/.
3. The Eclipse Test & Performance Tools Platform (TPTP) Project, http://www.eclipse.org/tptp/.
4. K. Beck. Extreme Programming Explained - Embrace Change. Addison-Wesley, 1999.
5. K. Beck. Test-Driven Development: By Example. Addison-Wesley, 2003.
6. K. Beck and E. Gamma. Test infected: Programmers love writing tests. Java Report, 3(7):51-56, 1998.
7. R. Binder. Testing Object-Oriented Systems: Models, Patterns, and Tools. Addison-Wesley, 2000.
8. L.C. Briand, Y. Labiche, and J. Leduc. Toward the reverse engineering of uml sequence diagrams for distributed java software. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 32(9):642-663, 2006.
9. S. Demeyer, S. Ducasse, and O. Nierstrasz. Object Oriented Reengineering Patterns. Morgan Kaufmann, 2002.
10. A. van Deursen. Program comprehension risks and benefits in extreme programming. In Proc. 8th Working Conf. on Reverse Engineering (WCRE'01), pages 176-185, 2001.
11. A. Forward and T. C. Lethbridge. The relevance of software documentation, tools and technologies: a survey. In Proc. ACM symposium on Document engineering (DocEng '02), pages 26-33, 2002.
12. E. Gamma, R. Helm, R. Johnson, and J. Vlissides. Design Patterns Elements of Reusable Object-Oriented Software. Addison-Wesley, 1994.
13. J. van Geet and A. Zaidman. A lightweight approach to determining the adequacy of tests as documentation. In Proc. 2nd Int. Workshop on Program Comprehension through Dynamic Analysis (PCODA'06), pages 21-26, 2006.
14. A. Hamou-Lhadj and T.C. Lethbridge. A survey of trace exploration tools and techniques. In Proc. 2004 Conf. of the Centre for Advanced Studies on Collaborative Research (CAS-CON'04), pages 42-55, 2004.
15. D. Jerding and S. Rugaber. Using visualization for architectural localization and extraction. In Proc. 4th Working Conf. on Reverse Engineering (WCRE'97), page 56, 1997.
16. R. Kollmann and M. Gogolla. Capturing dynamic program behaviour with UML collaboration diagrams. In Proc. 5th Conf. on Software Maintenance and Reengineering (CSMR'01), pages 58-67, 2001.
17. R. Kollmann, P. Selonen, E. Stroulia, T. Systä, and A. Zündorf. A study on the current state of the art in tool-supported UML-based static reverse engineering. In Proc. 9th Working Conf. on Reverse Engineering (WCRE'02), pages 22-32, 2002.
18. B. Marick. Agile methods and agile testing. http://testing.com/agile/ agile-testing-essay.html (accessed October 9th, 2006), 2004.
19. K. W Miller. Test driven development on the cheap: text files and explicit scaffolding. J. Comput. Small Coll., 20(2):181-189, 2004.
20. OMG. UML 2.0 infrastructure specification. Object Management Group, http://www.omg.org/, 2003.
21. M.J. Pacione, M. Roper, and M. Wood. Comparative evaluation of dynamic visualisation tools. In Proc. 10th Working Conf. on Reverse Engineering (WCRE'03), pages 80-89, 2003.
22. W. De Pauw, E. Jensen, N. Mitchell, G. Sevitsky, J. Vlissides, and J. Yang. Visualizing the Execution of Java Programs, pages 151-162. Springer-Verlag, 2001.
23. W. De Pauw, D. Lorenz, J. Vlissides, and M. Wegman. Execution patterns in object-oriented visualization. In Proc. 4th USENIX Conf. on Object-Oriented Technologies and Systems (COOTS'98), pages 219-234, 1998.
24. C. Riva and J. V. Rodriguez. Combining static and dynamic views for architecture reconstruction. In Proc. 6th Conf. on Software Maintenance and Reengineering (CSMR '02), pages 47-55, 2002.
25. A. Rountev and B. H. Connell. Object naming analysis for reverse-engineered sequence diagrams. In Proc. 27th Int. Conf. on Software Engineering (ICSE'05), pages 254-263, 2005.
26. A. Rountev, O. Volgin, and M. Reddoch. Static control-flow analysis for reverse engineering of UML sequence diagrams. In Proc. 6th Workshop on Program Analysis for Software Tools and Engineering (PASTE'05), pages 96-102, 2005.
27. J. Rumbaugh, I. Jacobson, and G. Booch. The Unified Modeling Language Reference Manual. Addison-Wesley, 1998.
28. K. Schwaber and M. Beedle. Agile Software Development with Scrum. Prentice Hall, 2001.
29. R. Sharp and A. Rountev. Interactive exploration of UML sequence diagrams. In Proc. 3rd Int. Workshop on Visualizing Software for Understanding and Analysis (VISSOFT'05), pages 8-15, 2005.
30. J. Stapleton. Dynamic Systems Development Method: The method in practice. Addison-Wesley, 1997.
31. T. Systä, K. Koskimies, and H. Müller. Shimba - an environment for reverse engineering Java software systems. Software - Practice and Experience, 31(4):371-394, 2001.
32. S. Yang, M. M. Burnett, E. DeKoven, and M. Zloof. Representation design benchmarks: a design-time aid for vpl navigable static representations. J. Visual Lang. & Computing, 8(5-6): 563-599, 1997.
33. A. Zaidman. Scalability Solutions for Program Comprehension through Dynamic Analysis. PhD thesis, University of Antwerp, 2006.
34. A. Zaidman, T. Calders, S. Demeyer, and J. Paredaens. Applying webmining techniques to execution traces to support the program comprehension process. In Proc. 9th Conf. on Software Maintenance and Reengineering (CSMR '05), pages 134-142, 2005.