Both sides of the story: Explaining events in a narrative

Philosophical Studies

Volumn 135, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 49-63

  Currie, Gregory ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Causality; Intention; Narration; Narrative; Representation; Story

Indexed keywords

EID: 34547652973     PISSN: 00318116     EISSN: 15730883     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11098-007-9092-1     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Auerbach, E. (1953). Mimesis: The representation of reality in western literature. Princeton University Press.
2. Beardsley, M. (1981). Aesthetics (2nd ed.). Hackett.
3. Bruner, J. (1990). Acts of meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
4. Carroll, N. (2001). On the narrative connection. In W. van Peer & S. Chatman (Eds.), Perspectives on narrative perspective. Albany: State University of New York Press.
5. Culler, J. (1980). Fabula and Sjuzhet in the analysis of narrative: Some American discussions. Poetics Today, 1, 27-37.
6. Currie, G. (1990). The nature of fiction. New York: Cambridge University Press.
7. Currie, G. (1993). Objectivity and interpretation. Mind, 102, 413-428.
8. Currie, G. (2006). Narrative representation of causes. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 64, 309-316.
9. Gendler, T. S. (2003). On the relation between pretence and belief. In M. Kieran & D. M. Lopes (Eds), Imagination, philosophy and the arts. London: Routledge.
10. Gendler, T. S. (2006). Imaginative contagion. Metaphilosophy.
11. Iser, W. (1989). Prospecting: From reader response to literary anthropology. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
12. Jolly, R (1997). Review of S. Teahan, The rhetorical logic of Henry James. Review of English Studies, 98, 555-556.
13. Kinkead-Weekes, M. (1962). Introduction to the everyman library edition of Pamela. London: Dent and Son.
14. Lamarque, P. (1996). Fictional points of view. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
15. Lewis, D. (1983). Truth in fiction, Philosophical Papers, (Vol. 1). New York: Oxford University Press.
16. Lewis, D. K. (1986). Causal explanation. In Philosophical Papers (Vol. 2). New York, Oxford University Press.
17. Predelli, S. (2005). Contexts. Meaning, truth, and the use of language. Oxford University Press.
18. Prince, G. (1998). Revisiting narrativity. In W. Grünzweig & A. Solbach (Eds.), Grenzüberschreitungen: Narratologie im Kontext. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.
19. Rabkin, E. S. (1977). Spatial form and plot. Critical Inquiry, 4, 253-270.
20. Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1995). Relevance (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.
21. Steinberg, L. (1983). The sexuality of Christ in renaissance art and modern oblivion. New York: Pantheon.
22. Velleman, J. D. (2003). Narrative explanation. Philosophical Review, 112, 1-25.
23. Walton, K. (1970). Categories of art. The Philosophical Review, 79, 334-367.
24. Walton, K. (1973). Pictures and make-believe. The Philosophical Review, 82, 283-319.
25. Walton, K. (1990). Mimesis as make-believe. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
26. White, H. (1981). The value of narrativity and the representation of reality. In W. J. T. Mitchell (Ed.), On narrative. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
27. Wilson, G. (2003). The transfiguration of classical Hollywood norms. In B. Gaut & P. Livingstone (Eds.), The creation of art. Cambridge University Press.
28. Wollheim, R. (1980). Seeing-as, seeing-in and pictorial perception. In Art and its objects (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.