Tubeless Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy-Should a Stent be an Integral Part?

Journal of Urology

Volumn 178, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 921-924

  Mandhani, Anil ^a   Goyal, Rajiv ^a   Vijjan, Vivek ^a   Dubey, Deepak ^a   Kapoor, Rakesh ^a  

^a SANJAY GANDHI POSTGRADUATE INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (India)

Author keywords

nephrostomy; percutaneous; stents

Indexed keywords

DICLOFENAC; SPONGOSTAN;

ADULT; ANALGESIA; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVICE REMOVAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LENGTH OF STAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NEPHROLITHIASIS; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STENT; URINE INCONTINENCE;

ADULT; BLOOD LOSS, SURGICAL; HUMANS; KIDNEY CALCULI; LENGTH OF STAY; NEPHROSTOMY, PERCUTANEOUS; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; STENTS;

EID: 34547652149     PISSN: 00225347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.05.021     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Fernstone I., and Johanson B. Percutaneous pyelolithotomy. A new extraction technique. Scand J Urol Nephrol 10 (1976) 257
2. Jackman S.V., Hedican S.P., and Docimo S.G. Miniaturized access for pediatric percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol 11 (1997) 133
3. Helal M., Black T., and Lockhart J. The Hickman peel away sheath: alternative for pediatric percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol 11 (1997) 171
4. Jackman S.V., Docimo S.G., and Cadeddu J.A. The "mini-perk" technique: a less invasive alternative to percutaneous nephrolithotomy. World J Urol 16 (1998) 371
5. Goh M., and Wolf J.S. Almost totally tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: further evaluation of the technique. J Endourol 13 (1999) 177
6. Limb J., and Bellman G.C. Tubeless percutaneous renal surgery: review of first 112 patients. Urology 59 (2002) 527
7. Maheshwari P.N., Andankar M.G., and Bansal M. Nephrostomy tube after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: large bore or pigtail catheter?. J Endourol 14 (2000) 735
8. Choi K., Brusky J., Weaver J., Amantia M., and Bellman G.C. Randomized trial comparing modified tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy with tailed stent with percutaneous nephrostomy with small bore tube. J Endourol 20 (2006) 766
9. Feng M.I., Tamaddon K., Mikhail A., Kaptein J.S., and Bellman G.C. Prospective randomized study of various techniques of percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urology 58 (2001) 345
10. Karami H., and Gholamrezaie H.R. Totally tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy in selected patients. J Endourol 18 (2004) 475
11. Desai M.R., Kukreja R.A., Desai M.M., Mhaskar S.S., Wani K.A., and Patel S.H. A prospective randomized comparison of type of nephrostomy drainage following percutaneous nephrolithotomy: large bore versus small bore versus tubeless. J Urol 172 (2004) 565
12. Mandhani M., Rakesh K., Wahid Z., Anant K., Bhandari M., and Gambhir S. Is 2 week duration sufficient for stenting in endopyelotomy?. J Urol 169 (2003) 886
13. Lojanapiwat B., Soonthornphan S., and Wudhikarn S. Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy in selected patients. J Endourol 15 (2001) 711
14. Gupta V., Sadasukhi T.C., Sharma K.K., Yadav R.G., and Mathur R. Tubeless and stentless percutaneous nephrolithotomy. BJU Int 95 (2005) 905