Two distinct functional networks for successful resolution of proactive interference

Cerebral Cortex

Volumn 17, Issue 7, 2007, Pages 1650-1663

  Caplan, Jeremy B ^a,b   McIntosh, Anthony R ^a,c   De Rosa, Eve ^a,c  

^a ROTMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Acetylcholine; Basal forebrain; FMRI; Learning and memory; Proactive interference

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; BEHAVIOR CONTROL; BRAIN FUNCTION; BRAIN NUCLEUS; CHOLINERGIC ACTIVITY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGONAL BAND OF BROCA; EFFERENT NERVE; FOREBRAIN; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HIPPOCAMPUS; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MEMORY; NERVE CELL NETWORK; ORBITAL CORTEX; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROACTIVE INHIBITION; SELECTIVE ATTENTION; STATE DEPENDENT LEARNING; STIMULUS RESPONSE; SUBICULUM; TASK PERFORMANCE; ALCOHOLISM; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEMALE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY;

ALCOHOLISM; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEMALE; HIPPOCAMPUS; HUMANS; MALE; MEMORY; MIDDLE AGED; NERVE NET; PROSENCEPHALON; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS;

EID: 34547651334     PISSN: 10473211     EISSN: 14602199     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhl076     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. American Psychiatric Association. 1994. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 4th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
2. Atri A, Sherman S, Norman KA, Kirchhoff BA, Nicolas MM, Greicius MD, Cramer SC, Breiter ME, Hasselmo HC, Stern CE. 2004. Blockade of central cholinergic receptors impairs new learning and increases proactive interference in a word paired-associate memory task. Behav Neurosci 118(1):223-236.
3. Badre D, Wagner AD. 2005. Frontal lobe mechanisms that resolve proactive interference. Cereb Cortex 15:2003-2012.
4. Barber AD, Carter CS. 2005. Cognitive control involved in overcoming prepotent response tendencies and switching between tasks. Cereb Cortex 15:899-912.
5. Bland BH. 1986. The physiology and pharmacology of hippocampal formation theta rhythms. Prog Neurobiol 26:1-54.
6. Caplan JB, Madsen JR, Schulze-Bonhage A, Aschenbrenner-Scheibe R, Newman EL, Kahana MJ. 2003. Human theta oscillations related to sensorimotor integration and spatial learning. J Neurosci 23(11): 4726-4736.
7. Carter CS, Braver TS, Barch DM, Botvinick MM, Noll D, Cohen JD. 1998. Anterior cingulate cortex, error detection, and the online monitoring of performance. Science 280:747-749. (Pubitemid 28243351)
8. Cleland TA, Linster C. 2002. How synchronization properties among second-order sensory neurons can mediate stimulus salience. Behav Neurosci 116(2):212-221.
9. de Araujo DB, Baffa O, Wakai RT. 2002. Theta oscillations and human navigation: a magnetoencephalography study. J Cogn Neurosci 14(1): 70-78.
10. De Rosa E, Desmond JE, Anderson AK, Pfefferbaum A, Sullivan EV. 2004. The human basal forebrain integrates the old and the new. Neuron 41:1-20.
11. De Rosa E, Hasselmo ME. 2000. Muscarinic cholinergic neuromodulation reduces proactive interference between stored odor memories during associative learning in rats. Behav Neurosci 114(1):32-41.
12. De Rosa E, Hasselmo ME, Baxter MG. 2001. Contribution of cholin-ergic basal forebrain to proactive interference from stored odor memories during associative learning in rats. Behav Neurosci 115(2):314-327.
13. De Rosa E, Sullivan EV. 2003. Enhanced release from proactive interference in nonamnesic alcoholic individuals: implications for impaired associative binding. Neuropsychology 17(3):469-481.
14. D'Esposito M, Postle BR, Jonides J, Smith EE. 1999. The neural substrate and temporal dynamics of interference effects in working memory as revealed by event-related functional MRI. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:7514-7519.
15. Duvernoy HM. 1991. The human brain: surface, three-dimensional sectional anatomy and MRI. New York: Springer.
16. Ekstrom AD, Caplan JB, Ho E, Shattuck K, Fried I, Kahana MJ. 2005. Human hippocampal theta activity during virtual navigation. Hippocampus 15:881-889.
17. Frank MJ, Rudy JW, O'Reilly RC. 2003. Transitivity, flexibility, conjunctive representations, and the hippocampus. II. A computational analysis. Hippocampus 13:341-354.
18. Friston KJ, Holmes AP, Worsley J, Poline CD, Frith CD, Frackowiak RSJ. 1995. Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: a general linear approach. Hum Brain Mapp 2:189-210.
19. Ghashghaei HT, Barbas H. 2001. Neural interaction between the basal forebrain and functionally distinct prefrontal cortices in the rhesus monkey. Neuroscience 103:593-614.
20. Gilbert PE, Kesner RP. 2002. Role of the rodent hippocampus in paired-associate learning involving associations between a stimulus and a spatial location. Behav Neurosci 116(1):63-71.
21. Giovanello KS, Schnyer DM, Verfaellie M. 2004. A critical role for the anterior hippocampus in relational memory: evidence from an fMRI study comparing associative and item recognition. Hippocampus 14:5-8.
22. Glover GH, Lai S. 1998. Self-navigated spiral fMRI: interleaved versus single-shot. Magn Reson Med 39:361-368.
23. Glover GH, Law CS. 2001. Spiral-in/out BOLD fMRI for increased SNR and reduced susceptibility artifacts. Magn Reson Med 46(3):512-522.
24. Griffin AL, Asaka Y, Darling RD, Berry SD. 2004. Theta-contingent trial presentation accelerates learning rate and enhances hippocampal plasticity during trace eyeblink conditioning. Behav Neurosci 118(2):403-411.
25. Hasselmo ME, Bower JM. 1993. Acetylcholine and memory. Trends Neurosci 16(6):218-222.
26. Hasselmo ME, McGaughy J. 2004. High acetylcholine sets circuit dynamics for attention and encoding; low acetylcholine sets dynamics for consolidation. Prog Brain Res 145:207-231.
27. Hasselmo ME, Schnell E. 1994. Laminar selectivity of the cholinergic suppression of synaptic transmission in rat hippocampal region CA 1: computational modeling and brain slice physiology. J Neurosci 14(6):3898-3914.
28. Henke K, Buck A, Weber B, Wieser HG. 1997. Human hippocampus establishes associations in memory. Hippocampus 7:249-256.
29. Henson RNA, Shallice T, Josephs O, Dolan RJ. 2002. Functional magnetic resonance imaging of proactive interference during spoken cued recall. Neuroimage 17:543-558.
30. Holdstock JS, Mayes AR, Roberts N, Cezayirli E, Isaac CL, O'Reilly RC, Norman KA. 2002. Under what conditions is recognition spared relative to recall after selective hippocampal damage in humans? Hippocampus 12:341-351.
31. Holroyd CB, Nieuwenhuis S, Yeung N, Nystrom L, Mars RB, Coles MG. H, Cohen JD. 2004. Dorsal anterior cingulate cortex shows fMRI response to internal and external error signals. Nat Neurosci 7(5):497-498.
32. Insausti R, Amaral DG, Cowan WM. 1987. The entorhinal cortex of the monkey: II. cortical afferents. J Comp Neurol 264(3):356-395. (Pubitemid 17150686)
33. Jonides J, Nee DE. 2005. Brain mechanisms of proactive interference in working memory. Neuroscience. Epub ahead of print.
34. Jonides J, Smith EE, Marshuetz C, Koeppe RA, Reuter-Lorenz PA. 1998. Inhibition in verbal working memory revealed by brain activation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:8410-8413.
35. Kahana MJ, Sekuler R, Caplan JB, Kirschen MP, Madsen JR. 1999. Human theta oscillations exhibit task dependence during virtual maze navigation. Nature 399:781-784.
36. Kirwan CB, Stark CEL. 2004. Medial temporal lobe activation during encoding and retrieval of novel face-name pairs. Hippocampus 14:919-930.
37. Komisaruk BR. 1977. The role of rhythmical brain activity in sensori-motor integration. In: Sprague J, Epstein A, editors. Progress in psychology and physiological integration, Volume 7, p. 55-90. New York: Academic Press.
38. Mattis S. 1998. Dementia Rating Scale (DRS) professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
39. Mayes AR, Holdstock JS, Isaac C, Montaldi D, Grigor J, Gummer A, Cariga P, Downes JJ, Tsivilis D, Gaffan D, and others. 2004. Associative recognition in a patient with selective hippocampal lesions and relatively normal item recognition. Hippocampus 14: 763-784. (Pubitemid 39220394)
40. McIntosh AR, Bookstein FL, Haxby JV, Grady CL. 1996. Spatial pattern analysis of functional brain images using partial least squares. Neuroimage 3:143-157.
41. McIntosh AR, Cabeza RE, Lobaugh NJ. 1998. Analysis of neural interactions explains the activation of occipital cortex by an auditory stimulus. J Neurophysiol 80:2790-2796.
42. McIntosh AR, Lobaugh NJ. 2004. Partial least squares analysis of neuro-imaging data: applications and advances. Neuroimage 23(Suppl 1): S250-S263.
43. McIntosh AR, Lobaugh NJ, Cabeza R, Bookstein FL, Houle S. 1998. Convergence of neural systems processing stimulus associations and coordinating motor responses. Cereb Cortex 8(7): 648-659.
44. Meltzer JA, Constable RT. 2005. Activation of human hippocampal formation reflects success in both encoding and cued recall of paired associates. Neuroimage, 24:384-397.
45. Mesulam MM, Mufson EJ, Levey AI, Wainer BH. 1983. Cholinergic innervation of cortex by the basal forebrain: cytochemistry and cortical connections of the septal area, diagonal band nuclei, nucleus basalis (substantia innominata), and hypothalamus in the rhesus monkey. J Comp Neurol 214:170-197.
46. O'Reilly RC, McClelland JL. 1994. Hippocampal conjunctive encoding, storage and recall: avoiding a trade off (Tech. Rep. No. PDP.CNS.94.4). Carnegie Mellon University, University of Pittsburgh, University of Southern California, MRC Applied Psychology Unit.
47. O'Reilly RC, Rudy JW. 2001. Conjunctive representations in learning and memory: principles of cortical and hippocampal function. Psychol Rev 108(2):311-345.
48. Pfefferbaum A, Rosenbloom M, Crusan K, Jernigan TL. 1988. Brain CT changes in alcoholics: effects of age and alcohol consumption. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 12:81-87.
49. Postle BR, Berger JS, Goldstein JH, Curtis CE, D'Esposito M. 2001. Behavioral and neurophysiological correlates of episodic coding, proactive interference, and list length effects in a running span verbal working memory task. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 1(1):10-21.
50. Postle BR, Brush LN, Nick AM. 2004. Prefrontal cortex and the mediation of proactive interference in working memory. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 4(4):600-608.
51. Raghavachari S, Kahana MJ, Rizzuto DS, Caplan JB, Kirschen MP, Bourgeois B, Madsen JR, Lisman JE. 2001. Gating of human theta oscillations by a working memory task. J Neurosci 21(9): 3175-3183.
52. Rudy JW, Sutherland RJ. 1989. The hippocampal formation is necessary for rats to learn and remember configurational discriminations. Behav Brain Res 34(1-2):97-109.
53. Rudy JW, Sutherland RJ. 1995. Configural association theory and the hippocampal formation: an appraisal and reconfiguration. Hippocampus 5(5):375-389.
54. Rye DB, Wainer BH, Mesulam MM, Mufson EJ, Saper CB. 1984. Cortical projections arising from the basal forebrain: a study of cholinergic and noncholinergic components employing combined retrograde tracing and immunohistochemical localization of choline acetyl transferase. Neuroscience 13:627-643.
55. Schreurs BG, McIntosh AR, Bahro M, Herscovitch P, Sunderland T, Molchan SE. 1997. Lateralization and behavioral correlation of changes in regional cerebral blood flow with classical conditioning of the human eyeblink response. J Neurophysiol 77: 2153-2163.
56. Seager MA, Johnson LD, Chabot ES, Asaka Y, Berry SD. 2002. Oscillatory brain states and learning: impact of hippocampal theta-contingent training. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99(3): 1616-1620.
57. Sperling R, Chua E, Cocchiarella A, Rand-Giovannetti E, Poldrack R, Schacter, DL, Albert M. 2003. Putting names to faces: successful encoding of associative memories activates the anterior hippocam-pal formation. Neuroimage 20:1400-1410.
58. Thiel CM. 2003. Cholinergic modulation of learning and memory in the human brain as detected with functional neuroimaging. Neurobiol Learn Mem 80:234-244.
59. Turken AU, Swick D. 1999. Response selection in the human anterior cingulate cortex. Nat Neurosci 2(10):920-924.
60. Van Elzakker M, O'Reilly RC, Rudy JW. 2003. Transitivity, flexibility, conjunctive representations, and the hippocampus. I. An empirical analysis. Hippocampus 13:292-298.
61. Wager TD, Sylvester C-YC, Lacey SC, Nee DE, Franklin M, Jonides J. 2005. Common and unique components of response inhibition revealed by fMRI. Neuroimage 27:323-340.
62. Winocur G, Moscovitch M, Bruni J. 1996. Heightened interference on implicit, but not explicit, tests of negative transfer: evidence from patients with unilateral temporal lobe lesions and normal old people. Brain Cogn 30:44-58.
63. Woolf NJ. 1996. Global and serial neurons form a hierarchically arranged interface proposed to underlie memory and cognition. Neuroscience 74(3):625-651.