Comparison of endoscopic ultrasonography and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in the diagnosis of pancreatobiliary diseases: A prospective study

American Journal of Gastroenterology

Volumn 102, Issue 8, 2007, Pages 1632-1639

  Fernández Esparrach, Glòria ^a   Ginès, Àngels ^a,c   Sánchez, Marcelo ^b   Pagés, Mario ^b   Pellisé, Maria ^a   Fernández Cruz, Laureano ^b   López Boado, Miguel Angel ^b   Quintó, Llorenç ^b   Navarro, Salvador ^a   Sendino, Oriol ^a   Cárdenas, Andrés ^a   Ayuso, Carmen ^b   Bordas, Josep M ^a   Llach, Josep ^a   Castells, Antoni ^a  

^a Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer CIBERONC University of Barcelona   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA   (Spain)

^c HOSPITAL CLÍNIC   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CHOLELITHIASIS; COMMON BILE DUCT STONE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; ECHOGRAPHY; ENDOSCOPY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MAGNETIC RESONANCE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PANCREAS ADENOCARCINOMA; PEROPERATIVE CHOLANGIOGRAPHY; PREVALENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY;

AGED; CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY, MAGNETIC RESONANCE; CHOLEDOCHOLITHIASIS; COMMON BILE DUCT NEOPLASMS; ENDOSONOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 34547647629     PISSN: 00029270     EISSN: 15720241     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01333.x     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. O'Connor HJ, Hamilton I, Ellis WR, et al. Ultrasound detection of choledocholithiasis: Prospective comparison with ERCP in the postcholecystectomy patient. Gastrointest Radiol 1986 11 : 161 4.
2. Sugiyama M, Atomi Y. Endoscopic ultrasonography for diagnosing choledocholithiasis: A prospective comparative study with ultrasonography and computed tomography. Gastrointest Endosc 1997 45 : 143 6.
3. Abboud PC, Malet PF, Berlin JA. Predictors of common bile duct stones prior to cholecystectomy: A meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 1996 44 : 450 9.
4. Guibaud L, Bret PM, Reinhold C, et al. Bile duct obstruction and choledocholithiasis: Diagnosis with MR cholangiography. Radiology 1995 197 : 109 15.
5. Loperfido S, Angelini G, Benedetti G, et al. Major early complications from diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: A prospective multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 1998 48 : 1 10.
6. Kohut M, Nowakowska-Dulawa E, Marek T, et al. Accuracy of linear endoscopic ultrasonography in the evaluation of patients with suspected common bile duct stones. Endoscopy 2002 4 : 299 303.
7. Shim CS, Joo JH, Park CW, et al. Effectiveness of endoscopic ultrasonography in the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis prior to laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Endoscopy 1995 27 : 428 32.
8. Palazzo L, Girollet PP, Salmeron M, et al. Value of endoscopic ultrasonography in the diagnosis of common bile duct stones: Comparison with surgical exploration and ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc 1995 42 : 225 31.
9. Chan YL, Chan AC, Lam WW, et al. Choledocholithiasis: Comparison of MR cholangiography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography. Radiology 1996 200 : 85 9.
10. Soto JA, Barish MA, Yucel EK, et al. Magnetic resonance cholangiography: Comparison with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Gastroenterology 1996 110 : 589 97.
11. Becker CD, Grossholz M, Becker M, et al. Choledocholithiasis and bile duct stenosis: Diagnostic accuracy of MR cholangiopancreatography. Radiology 1997 205 : 523 30.
12. Mendler MH, Bouillet P, Sautereau D, et al. Value of MR cholangiography in the diagnosis of obstructive diseases of the biliary tree: A study of 58 cases. Am J Gastroenterol 1998 93 : 2482 90.
13. Varghese JC, Liddell RP, Farrell MA, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance cholagiopancreatography and ultrasound compared with direct cholangiography in the detection of choledocholithiasis. Clin Radiol 2000 55 : 25 35.
14. Stiris MG, Tennoe B, Aadland E, et al. MR cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in patients with suspected common bile duct stones. Acta Radiol 2000 41 : 269 72.
15. Taylor A, Little A, Hennessy O, et al. Prospective assessment of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for noninvasive imaging of the biliary tree. Gastrointest Endosc 2002 55 : 17 22.
16. Calvo MM, Bujanda L, Calderon A, et al. Role of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in patients with suspected choledocholithiasis. Mayo Clin Proc 2002 77 : 422 8.
17. Burtin P, Palazzo L, Cananrd JM, et al. Diagnostic strategies for extrahepatic cholestasis of indefinite origin: Endoscopic ultrasonography or retrograde cholangiography ? Results of a prospective study. Endoscopy 1997 2 : 349 55.
18. Prat F, Amouyal G, Amouyal P, et al. Prospective controlled study of endoscopic ultrasonography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in patients with suspected common-bileduct lithiasis. Lancet 1996 347 : 75 9.
19. Materne R, Van Beers BE, Gigot JF, et al. Extrahepatic biliary obstruction: Magnetic resonance imaging compared with endoscopic ultrasonography. Endoscopy 2000 32 : 3 9.
20. Scheiman JM, Carlos RC, Barnett JL, et al. Can endoscopic ultrasound or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography replace ERCP in patients with suspected biliary disease? A prospective trial and cost analysis. Am J Gastroenterol 2001 96 : 2900 4.
21. Röch T, Meining A, Frühmorgen S, et al. A prospective comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of ERCP, MRCP, CT, and EUS in biliary strictures. Gastrointest Endosc 2002 55 : 870 6.
22. de Léinghen V, Lecesne R, Raymond JM, et al. Diagnosis of choledocholithiasis: EUS or magnetic resonance cholangiography ? A prospective controlled study. Gastrointest Endosc 1999 49 : 26 31.
23. Aubé C, Delorme B, Yzet T, et al. MR cholangiopancreatography versus endoscopic sonography in suspected common bile duct lithiasis: A prospective, comparative study. Am J Roentgenol 2005 184 : 55 62.
24. Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, et al. The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: Explanation and elaboration. Clin Chem 2003 49 : 7 18.
25. Bose SM, Mazumdar A, Prakash VS. Evaluation of the predictors of choledocholithiasis: Comparative analysis of clinical, biochemical, radiological, radionuclear, and intraoperative parameters. Surg Today 2001 31 : 117 22.
26. Pellisé M, Castells A, Ginès A, et al. Clinical usefulness of KRAS mutational analysis in the diagnosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma by means of endosonography-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2003 17 : 1299 307.
27. Lee SP, Hayashi A, Kim YS. Biliary sludge: Curiosity or culprit? Hepatology 1994 20 : 523 5.
28. Motulsky H. Choosing an appropriate sample size. In : Intuitive biostatistics. New YorkOxford : Oxford University Press, 1995 : 195 204.
29. Hintze J. NCSS and PASS. Number Cruncher Statistical Systems. Kaysville, UT. Available at : http://www.NCSS.com. Accessed November 15, 2006.
30. Baillie J, Paulson EK, Vitellas KM. Biliary imaging: A review. Gastroenterology 2003 124 : 1686 99.
31. Fulcher AS, Turner MA. Pitfalls of MR cholangiopancreatography (MRCP). J Comput Assist Tomogr 1998 22 : 845 50.
32. Irie H, Honda H, Kuroiwa T, et al. Pitfalls in MR cholangiopancreatography interpretation. Radiographics 2001 21 : 23 37.
33. Watanabe Y, Dohke M, Ishimori T, et al. Diagnostic pitfalls of MR cholangiopancreatography in the evaluation of the biliary tract and gallbladder. Radiographics 1999 19 : 415 29.
34. Verma D, Kapadia A, Eisen GM, et al. EUS vs MRCP for detection of choledocholithiasis. Gastrointest Endosc 2006 64 : 248 54.