Evaluation of the effectiveness of posters to provide information to patients about a DNA database and their opportunity to opt out

Cell and Tissue Banking

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 233-241

  Pulley, Jill M ^a   Brace, Margaret ^a   Bernard, Gordon R ^a   Masys, Dan ^a  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Attitudes; Genetics; Informational signs; Notification; Patient; Perceptions

Indexed keywords

DNA;

ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGED; ARTICLE; AWARENESS; BLOOD SAMPLING; CHI SQUARE TEST; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA COLLECTION METHOD; DEMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; GENETIC DATABASE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL INFORMATION; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PATIENT DECISION MAKING; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PHLEBOTOMY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECALL; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; STRUCTURED INTERVIEW;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; COMMUNICATION; DATABASES, NUCLEIC ACID; DEMOGRAPHY; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS; MASS MEDIA; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT EDUCATION; PROGRAM EVALUATION; PUBLICATIONS;

EID: 34547642169     PISSN: 13899333     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10561-007-9033-4     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Ashe D, Patrick PA, Stempel MM, Shi Q, Brand DA (2006) Educational posters to reduce antibiotic use. J Pediatr Health Care 20:192-197
2. Catz DS, Green NS, Tobin JN, Lloyd-Puryear MA, Kyler P, Umemoto A, Cernoch J, Brown R, Wolman F (2005) Attitudes about genetics in underserved, culturally diverse populations. Community Genet 8:161-172
3. Clayton EW (2005) Regulation of biobanks: Banking without checks or insured deposits? JLME 33:15-21
4. Craven MA, Nikolaou L, Allen CJ, Crustolo AM, Kates N (2005) Patient education materials for mental health problems in family practice: Does location matter? Patient Educ Couns 56:192-196
5. Ernst AA, Weiss SJ, Nick TG, Iserson K, Biros MH (2005) Minimal-risk waiver of informed consent and exception from informed consent (Final Rule) studies at institutional review boards nationwide. Acad Emerg Med 12:1134-1137
6. The Gallup Organization (2000) Public attitudes toward medical privacy. Retrieved from http://www.forhealthfreedom.org/Gallupsurvey/ IHF-Gallup.html
7. Montazeri A, Sajadian A (2004) Do women read poster displays on breast cancer in waiting rooms? J Public Health 26:355-358
8. Office for Civil Rights, Department of Health and Human Services (2003) Standards for privacy of individually identifiable health information: Regulation text. Retrieved from http://www.hhs.gov/ocr/ combinedregtext.pdf
9. Office for Human Research Protections, Department of Health and Human Services (2004) Guidance on research involving coded private information or biological specimens. Retrieved from http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/ humansubjects/guidance/cdebiol.pdf
10. Savulescu J (2002) Education and debate: Against "No consent should be needed for using leftover body material for scientific purposes." BMJ 325:648-651
11. van Diest PJ (2002) Education and debate: For "No consent should be needed for using leftover body material for scientific purposes." BMJ 325:648-651
12. Ward K, Hawthorne K (1994) Do patients read health promotion posters in the waiting room? A study in one general practice. Brit J Gen Practice 44:583-585
13. Wendler D, Emanuel E (2002) The debate over research on stored biological samples: What do sources think? Arch Intern Med 162:1457-1462
14. Wicke DM, Lorge RE, Coppin RJ, Jones KP (1994) The effectiveness of waiting room notice-boards as a vehicle for health education. Fam Practice 11:292-295