New diagnostics for tuberculosis: An essential element for global control and elimination

Reichman and Hershfield's Tuberculosis: A Comprehensive, International Approach, Third Edition

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 1115-1133

  Perkins, Mark D ^a   O’Brien, Richard J ^a  

^a FOUNDATION FOR INNOVATIVE NEW DIAGNOSTICS   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34547630771     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (48)

1. Burman WJ, Jones BE. Clinical and radiographic features of HIV-related tuberculosis. Semin Respir Infect 2003; 18:263-271.
2. Squire SB, Belaye AK, Kashoti A, et al. ‘Lost’ smear-positive pulmonary tuberculosis cases: where are they and why did we lose them? Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2005; 9: 25-31.
3. Hargreaves NJ, Kadzakumanja O, Whitty CJ, et al. ‘Smear-negative’pulmonary tuberculosis in a DOTS programme: poor outcomes in an area of high HIV seroprev-alence. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2001; 5:847-854.
4. Pronyk PM, Kahn K, Hargreaves JR, et al. Undiagnosed pulmonary tuberculosis deaths in rural South Africa. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2004; 8:796-799.
5. Gutierrez EB, Zanetta DM, Saldiva PH, et al. Autopsy-proven determinants of death in HIV-infected patients treated for pulmonary tuberculosis in Sao Paulo, Brazil. Pathol Res Pract 2002; 198:339-346.
6. Anti-tuberculosis drug resistance in the world. Third global report. WHO/IUATLD Global Project on Anti-Tuberculosis Drug Resistance Surveillance 1999-2002. World Health Organization, 2004.
7. Ewer K, Deeks J, Alvarez L, et al. Comparison of T-cell-based assay with tuberculin skin test for diagnosis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in a school tuberculosis outbreak. Lancet 2003; 361:1168-1173.
8. Ferrara G, Losi M, Meacci M, et al. Routine hospital use of a new commercial whole blood interferon-gamma assay for the diagnosis of tuberculosis infection. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2005; 172:631-635.
9. Tuberculosis Division International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease. Tuberculosis bacteriology-priorities and indications in high prevalence countries: position of the technical staff of the Tuberculosis Division of the International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2005; 9: 355-361.
10. World Health Organization. Global Tuberculosis Report 2004.
11. Angeby KA, Hoffner SE, Diwan VK. Should the ‘bleach microscopy method’ be recommended for improved case detection of tuberculosis? Literature review and key person analysis. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2004; 8:806-815.
12. Miorner H, Ganlov G, Yohannes Z, et al. Improved sensitivity of direct microscopy for acid-fast bacilli: sedimentation as an alternative to centrifugation for concentration of tubercle bacilli. J Clin Microbiol 1996; 34:3206-3207.
13. Herman P, Maliwal BP, Lin HJ, et al. Frequency-domain fluorescence microscopy with the LED as a light source. J Microsc 2001; 203:176-181.
14. Morgan MA, Horstmeier CD, DeYoung DR, et al. Comparison of a radiometric method (BACTEC) and conventional culture media for recovery of mycobacteria from smear-negative specimens. J Clin Microbiol 1983; 18:384-388.
15. Somoskovi A, Kodmon C, Lantos A, et al. Comparison of recoveries of mycobacterium tuberculosis using the automated BACTEC MGIT 960 system, the BACTEC 460 TB system, and Lowenstein-Jensen medium. J Clin Microbiol 2000; 38:2395-2397.
16. Angeby KA, Werngren J, Toro JC, et al. Evaluation of the BacT/ALERT 3D system for recovery and drug susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Clin Microbiol Infect 2003; 9:1148-1152.
17. Baylan O, Kisa O, Albay A, et al. Evaluation of a new automated, rapid, colorimetric culture system using solid medium for laboratory diagnosis of tuberculosis and determination of anti-tuberculosis drug susceptibility. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2004; 8:772-777.
18. Mejia GI, Castrillon L, Trujillo H, et al. Microcolony detection in 7H11 thin layer culture is an alternative for rapid diagnosis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 1999; 3:138-142.
19. Moore DA, Mendoza D, Gilman RH, et al. Microscopic observation drug susceptibility assay, a rapid, reliable diagnostic test for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis suitable for use in resource-poor settings. J Clin Microbiol 2004; 42:4432-4437.
20. Alcaide F, Gali N, Dominguez J, et al. Usefulness of a new mycobacteriophage-based technique for rapid diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis. J Clin Microbiol 2003; 41:2867-2871.
21. Kalantri S, Pai M, Pascopella L, et al. Bacteriophage-based tests for the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in clinical specimens: a systematic review and metaanalysis. BMC Infect Dis 2005; 5:59.
22. Pai M, Kalantri S, Pascopella L, et al. Bacteriophage-based assays for the rapid detection of rifampicin resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis: a meta-analysis. J Infect 2005; 51:175-187.
23. Shamputa IC, Rigouts L, Portaels F. Molecular genetic methods for diagnosis and antibiotic resistance detection of mycobacteria from clinical specimens. APMIS 2004; 112:728-752.
24. Huggett JF, McHugh TD, Zumla A. Tuberculosis: amplification-based clinical diagnostic techniques. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 2003; 35:1407-1412.
25. Woods GL. Molecular techniques in mycobacterial detection. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2001; 125:122-126.
26. Suffys P, Palomino JC, Cardoso Leao S, et al. Evaluation of the polymerase chain reaction for the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2000; 4:179-183.
27. van Cleeff M, Kivihya-Ndugga L, Githui W, et al. Cost-effectiveness of polymerase chain reaction versus Ziehl-Neelsen smear microscopy for diagnosis of tuberculosis in Kenya. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2005; 9:877-883.
28. Iwamoto T, Sonobe T, Hayashi K. Loop-mediated isothermal amplification for direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex, M. avium, and M. intracellulare in sputum samples. J Clin Microbiol 2003; 41:2616-2622.
29. Daniel TM. Antibody and antigen detection for the immunodiagnosis of tuberculosis: why not? What more is needed? Where do we stand today? J Infect Dis 1988; 158:678-680.
30. Gennaro ML. Immunologic diagnosis of tuberculosis. Clin Infect Dis 2000; 30(suppl 3):S243-S246.
31. Samanich K, Belisle JT, Laal S. Homogeneity of antibody responses in tuberculosis patients. Infect Immun 2001; 69:4600-4609.
32. Weldingh K, Rosenkrands I, Okkels LM, et al. Assessing the serodiagnostic potential of 35 Mycobacterium tuberculosis proteins and identification of four novel serological antigens. J Clin Microbiol 2005; 43:57-65.
33. Houghton RL, Lodes MJ, Dillon DC, et al. Use of multiepitope polyproteins in serodiagnosis of active tuberculosis. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 2002; 9:883-891.
34. Perkins MD, Conde MB, Martins M, et al. Serologic diagnosis of tuberculosis using a simple commercial multiantigen assay. Chest 2003; 123:107-112.
35. Pottumarthy S, Wells VC, Morris AJ. A comparison of seven tests for serological diagnosis of tuberculosis. J Clin Microbiol 2000; 38:2227-2231.
36. Somi GR, O’Brien RJ, Mfinanga GS, et al. Evaluation of the MycoDot test in patients with suspected tuberculosis in a field setting in Tanzania. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 1999; 3:231-238.
37. Talbot EA, Hay Burgess DC, Hone NM, et al. Tuberculosis serodiagnosis in a predominantly HIV-infected population of hospitalized patients with cough, Botswana, 2002. Clin Infect Dis 2004; 39:e1-e7.
38. Sada E, Aguilar D, Torres M, et al. Detection of lipoarabinomannan as a diagnostic test for tuberculosis. J Clin Microbiol 1992; 30:2415-2418.
39. Tessema TA, Hamasur B, Bjun G, et al. Diagnostic evaluation of urinary lipoarabinomannan at an Ethiopian tuberculosis centre. Scand J Infect Dis 2001; 33: 279-284.
40. Bentley-Hibbert SI, Quan X, Newman T, et al. Pathophysiology of antigen 85 in patients with active tuberculosis: antigen 85 circulates as complexes with fibronectin and immunoglobulin G. Infect Immun 1999; 67:581-588.
41. Wallis RS et al. Induction of the antigen 85 complex of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in sputum: a determinant of outcome in pulmonary tuberculosis treatment. J Infect Dis 1998; 178:1115-1121.
42. Pavlou AK, Magan N, Jones JM, et al. Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (TB) in vitro and in situ using an electronic nose in combination with a neural network system. Biosens Bioelectron 2004; 20:538-544.
43. Fend R, Geddes R, Lesellier S, et al. Use of an electronic nose to diagnose Mycobacterium bovis infection in badgers and cattle. J Clin Microbiol 2005; 43:1745-1751.
44. Albert H, Trollip A, Seaman T, et al. RJ. Simple, phage-based (FASTPplaque) technology to determine rifampicin resistance of Mycobacterium tuberculosis directly from sputum. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2004; 8:1114-1119.
45. Dheda K, Lalvani A, Miller RF, et al. Performance of a T-cell-based diagnostic test for tuberculosis infection in HIV-infected individuals is independent of CD4 cell count. AIDS 2005; 19:2038-2041.
46. Hill PC, Brookes RH, Fox A, et al. Large-scale evaluation of enzyme-linked immuno-spot assay and skin test for diagnosis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection against a gradient of exposure in The Gambia. Clin Infect Dis 2004; 38:966-973.
47. Liebeschuetz S, Bamber S, Ewer K, et al. Diagnosis of tuberculosis in South African children with a T-cell-based assay: a prospective cohort study. Lancet 2004; 364:2196-2203.
48. Bosssuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, et al. Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: The STARD Initiative. Clin Chem 2003; 49:1-6.