Can the evidence be linked to the alpha error? [3]

American Journal of Gastroenterology

Volumn 102, Issue 8, 2007, Pages 1827-1828

  Marmo, Riccardo ^a   Rotondano, Gianluca ^b   Bianco, Maria A ^b   Cipolletta, Livio ^b  

^a Curto Hospital   (Italy)

^b Hospital Maresca   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ENDOSCOPY; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LETTER; MEDICAL ERROR; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PEPTIC ULCER BLEEDING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 34547628373     PISSN: 00029270     EISSN: 15720241     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01276.x     Document Type: Letter

References (5)

1. Marmo R, Rotondano G, Piscopo R, et al. Dual therapy versus monotherapy in the endoscopic treatment of high-risk bleeeding ulcers: A meta-analysis of controlled trials. Am J Gastroenterol 2007 102 : 279 89.
2. Sutton AJ, Abrams KR, Jones DR, et al. Methods for meta-analysis in medical research. Chichester, UK : John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., 2002 : 87 105.
3. Calvet X, Vergara M, Brullet E, et al. Addition of a second endoscopic treatment following epinephrine injection improves outcome in high-risk bleeding ulcers. Gastroenterology 2004 126 : 441 50.
4. Harbour R, Miller J. A new system for grading recommendations in evidence based guidelines. BMJ 2001 323 : 334 6.
5. Atkins D, Best D, Briss PA, et al. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 2004 328 : 1490.