Dual versus endoscopic monotherapy in bleeding peptic ulcers [2]

American Journal of Gastroenterology

Volumn 102, Issue 8, 2007, Pages 1826-1827

  Calvet, Xavier ^a,b   Vergara, Mercedes ^a,b   Gisbert, Javier P ^c   Brullet, Enric ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITAT AUTÒNOMA DE BARCELONA   (Spain)

^b INSTITUTO DE SALUD CARLOS III   (Spain)

^c HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARIO DE LA PRINCESA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADRENALIN; HEMOSTATIC AGENT;

CLINICAL TRIAL; COMBINATION CHEMOTHERAPY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DRUG EFFICACY; ENDOSCOPY; FOLLOW UP; HEMOSTASIS; HUMAN; LETTER; META ANALYSIS; MONOTHERAPY; PEPTIC ULCER BLEEDING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW;

HUMANS; META-ANALYSIS; PEPTIC ULCER HEMORRHAGE; RESEARCH DESIGN;

EID: 34547627306     PISSN: 00029270     EISSN: 15720241     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01266.x     Document Type: Letter

References (4)

1. Marmo R, Rotondano G, Piscopo R, et al. Dual therapy versus monotherapy in the endoscopic treatment of high-risk bleeeding ulcers: A meta-analysis of controlled trials. Am J Gastroenterol 2007 102 : 279 89.
2. Calvet X, Vergara M, Brullet E, et al. Addition of a second endoscopic treatment following epinephrine injection improves outcome in high-risk bleeding ulcers. Gastroenterology 2004 126 : 441 50.
3. Lenth, RV. Java Applets for Power and Sample Size [Computer software]. 2006. Available at : http://www.stat.uiowa.edu/∼rlenth/Power. Accessed February 6, 2007.
4. Bianco MA, Rotondano G, Marmo R, et al. Combined epinephrine and bipolar probe coagulation vs. bipolar probe coagulation alone for bleeding peptic ulcer: A randomized, controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2004 60 : 910 5.