Complications in robotic urological surgery

Minerva Urologica e Nefrologica

Volumn 59, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 191-198

  Murphy, D ^a,b   Challacombe, B ^a   Elhage, O ^a   Dasgupta, P ^a  

^a KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b GUY S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Computer assisted surgery; Nephrectomy; Postoperative complications; Prostatectomy

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; COMPUTER SYSTEM; HUMAN; KIDNEY SURGERY; LAPAROSCOPY; NEPHRECTOMY; PROSTATECTOMY; REVIEW; ROBOTICS; UROLOGIC SURGERY;

EQUIPMENT FAILURE; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; MALE; NEPHRECTOMY; PROSTATECTOMY; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; ROBOTICS; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; UROLOGIC DISEASES;

EID: 34547617713     PISSN: 03932249     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (32)

1. Peplinski R. Past, present and future of the da Vinci robot. Second UK Robotic Urology Course 2006, November 27, London, UK.
2. Murphy D, Challacombe B, Khan MS, Dasgupta P. Robotic technology in urology. Postgrad Med J 2006;82:743-7.
3. Nedas TG, Challacombe BJ, Dasgupta P. Robotics in urology: an update. Int J Med Robot Comput Assist Surg 2005;1:13-8.
4. Kavoussi LR, Moore RG, Adams JB, Partin AW. Comparison of robotic versus human laparoscopic camera control. J Urol 1995;154:2134-6.
5. Partin AW, Adams JB, Moore RG, Kavoussi LR. Complete robot-assisted laparoscopic urologic surgery: a preliminary report. J Am Coll Surg 1995;181:552-7.
6. Kommu S, Rimington P, Anderson C, Rane A. Initial experience with the EndoAssist camera-holding robot in laparoscopic urological surgery. Annual European Association of Urology Congress, 2007, March 21-24, Berlin, Germany.
7. Marescaux J, Leroy J, Gagner M, Rubino F, Mutter D, Vix M et al. Transatlantic robot-assisted telesurgery. Nature 2001;413:379-80.
8. Sung GT, Gill IS. Robotic laparoscopic surgery: a comparison of the DA Vinci and Zeus systems. Urology 2001;58:893-8.
9. Micali S, Virgili G, Vannozzi E, Grassi N, Jarrett TW, Bauer JJ et al. Feasibility of telementoring between Baltimore (USA) and Rome (Italy): the first five cases. J Endourol 2000;14:493-6.
10. Challacombe B, Patriciu A, Glass J, Aron M, Jarrett T, Kim F et al. A randomized controlled trial of human versus robotic and telerobotic access to the kidney as the first step in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Comput Aided Surg 2005;10:165-71.
11. US Food and Drug Administration. Manufacturer and User Device Experience (MAUDE). Rockville, MD: US Food and Drug Administration; 2007. Available from: http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfM AUDE/search.cfm,
12. Costello TG, Webb P. Anaesthesia for robot-assisted anatomic prostatectomy. Experience at a single institution. Anaesth Intensive Care 2006;34:787-92.
13. Hemal AK, Eun D, Tewari A, Menon M. Nuances in the optimum placement of ports in pelvic and upper urinary tract surgery using the da Vinci robot. Urol Clin North Am 2004;31:683-92, viii.
14. Rose K, Khan S, Godbole H, Olsburgh J, Dasgupta P. Robotic assisted retroperitoneoscopic nephroureterectomy - first experience and the hybrid port technique. Int J Clin Pract 2006;60:12-4.
15. Patel VR, Thaly R, Shah K. Robotic radical prostatectomy: outcomes of 500 cases. BJU Int 2007;99:1109-12.
16. Hu JC, Nelson RA, Wilson TG, Kawachi MH, Ramin SA, Lau C et al. Perioperative complications of laparoscopic and robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Urol 2006;175:541-6.
17. Borden LS Jr, Kozlowski PM, Porter CR, Corman JM. Mechanical failure rate of da Vinci robotic system. Can J Urol 2007;14:3499-501.
18. Tewari A, Srivasatava A, Menon M. A prospective comparison of radical retropubic and robot-assisted prostatectomy: experience in one institution. BJU Int 2003; 92:205-10.
19. Bhandari A, McIntire L, Kaul SA, Hemal AK, Peabody JO, Menon M. Perioperative complications of robotic radical prostatectomy after the learning curve. J Urol 2005;174:915-8.
20. Menon M, Shrivastava A, Kaul S, Badani KK, Fumo M, Bhandari M et al. Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy: contemporary technique and analysis of results. Eur Urol 2007;51:648-57.
21. Menon M, Hemal AK, Tewari A, Shrivastava A, Shoma AM, El-Tabey NA et al. Nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical cystoprostatectomy and urinary diversion. BJU Int 2003;92:232-6.
22. Beecken WD, Wolfram M, Engl T, Bentas W, Probst M, Blaheta R et al. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy and intra-abdominal formation of an orthotopic ileal neobladder. Eur Urol 2003;44:337-9.
23. Rhee JJ, Lebeau S, Smolkin M, Theodorescu D. Radical cystectomy with ileal conduit diversion: early prospective evaluation of the impact of robotic assistance. BJU Int 2006;98:1059-63.
24. El-Tabey NA, Shoma AM. Port site metastases after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy. Urology 2005;66:1110.
25. Guillonneau B, Jayet C, Tewari A, Vallancien G. Robot assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy. J Urol 2001;166: 200-1.
26. Hubert J, Feuillu FB, Prevot L, Cormier L, Mangin P. Robotic (da Vinci) remote laparoscopic nephrectomy:feasibility and results in 16 cases. Eur Urol 2003:44 Suppl:198.
27. Horgan S, Vanuno D, Benedetti E. Early experience with robotically assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2002;12:64-70.
28. Renoult E, Hubert J, Ladriere M, Billaut N, Mourey E, Feuillu B et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic and open live-donor nephrectomy: a comparison of donor morbidity and early renal allograft outcomes. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2006;21:472-7.
29. Horgan S, Galvani C, Gorodner MV, Jacobsen GR, Moser F, Manzelli A et al. Effect of robotic assistance on the "learning curve" for laparoscopic hand-assisted donor nephrectomy. Surg Endosc 2007 Feb 8; [Epub ahead of print].
30. Gettman MT, Peschel R, Neururer R, Bartsch G. A comparison of laparoscopic pyeloplasty performed with the daVinci robotic system versus standard laparoscopic techniques: initial clinical results. Eur Urol 2002;42:453-7.
31. Patel V. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty. Urology 2005;66:45-9.
32. Link RE, Bhayani SB, Kavoussi LR. A prospective comparison of robotic and laparoscopic pyeloplasty. Ann Surg 2006;243:486-91.