Using electronic peer audience and summary writing with ESL students

Journal of College Reading and Learning

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 24-33

  Strever, Jan ^a   Newman, Kathryn ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34547604960     PISSN: 10790195     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10790195.1997.10850051     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Bailey, N., & Flahive, D., (1993). Exploring reading/writing relationships in adult second language learners. In J., Carson & I., Leki (Eds.), Reading in the composition classroom:Second language perspectives (pp.141–160). Boston, MA:Heinle and Heinle.
2. Bell, J. H., (1991). Using peer response groups in ESL writing classes. TESL Canada Journal, 8, 65–71.
3. Bromley, K., (1993) Journaling:Engagements in reading, writing, and thinking. Jefferson City, MO:Scholastic Professional Books.
4. Canale, M., (1983). From communicative competence to language pedagogy. In J., Richards & R., Schmidt (Eds.), Language and communication (pp. 2–28). London:Longman.
5. Casazza, M., (1993). Using a model of direct instruction to teach summary writing in a college reading class. Journal of Reading, 37, 202–08.
6. Cohen, A., Glasman, H., Rosembaum-Cohen, P. R., Ferrara, J., & Fine, J., (1979). Reading for specialized purposes:Discourse analysis and the use of student informants. TESOL Quarterly, 13, 551–564.
7. Cunningham, J., (1982). Generating interactions between schemata and text. In J. A., Niles & L. A., Harris (Eds.), New inquiries in reading research and instruction (pp. 42–47). Thirty-First Yearbook of the National Reading Conference. Rochester, NY:National Reading Conference.
8. Dolly, M. R., (1990). Integrating ESL reading and writing through authentic discourse. Journal of Reading, 5, 360–365.
9. Dubin, F., Eskey, E., & Grabe, W., (1986). Teaching second language reading for academic purposes. Reading, MA:Addison-Wesley.
10. Durst, R., (1989). Monitoring processes in analytic and summary writing. Written Communication, 6, 340–63.
11. Littlewood, W., (1988). Foreign and second language learning:Language acquisition research and its implications for the classroom. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
12. McIntyre, S. R., & Tlusty, R. H., (1995). Computer mediated discourse:Electronic dialogue journaling and reflective practice. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
13. Radmacher, S., & Latosi-Sawin, E., (1995). Summary writing:A tool to improve student comprehension. Teaching of Psychology, 22, 113–115.
14. Readence, J., Bean, T., & Baldwin, R., (1989). Content area reading:An integrated approach. Dubuque, IA:Kendall/Hunt.
15. Schriver, K. A., (1993). Revising for readers:Audience awareness in the writing classroom. In A., Penrose & B., Sitko (Eds.), Hearing ourselves think:Cognitive research in the college writing classroom (pp. 147–167). New York:Oxford University Press.
16. Shih, M., (1992). Beyond comprehension exercises in the ESL academic reading class. TESOL Quarterly, 26, 289–318.
17. Wallace, D. L., (1987). Dialogue journals:A tool for ESL teaching. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 280 316).
18. Wu, T., Custer, R., & Dyrenfurth, M., (1996). Technological and personal problem solving styles:Is there a difference? Journal of Technological Education, 7, http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournals/JTE//jte-v7n2.html.
19. Yelon, S. L., (1996). Powerful principles of instruction. Michigan State University:Longman.