CT colonography for follow-up after surgery for colorectal cancer

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 189, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 283-289

  Young, Jun Choi ^a   Park, Seong Ho ^a   Seung, Soo Lee ^a   Choi, Eugene K ^b   Chang, Sik Yu ^a   Hee, Cheol Kim ^a   Jin, Cheon Kim ^a  

^a University of Ulsan College of Medicine   (South Korea)

^b WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Colorectal cancer; CT colonography; Postsurgical surveillance; Surgery

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CANCER RECURRENCE; COLON ANASTOMOSIS; COLON POLYP; COLON RESECTION; COLON ULCER; COLORECTAL CANCER; COLOSTOMY; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC COLONOGRAPHY; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; METASTASIS; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

COLONIC POLYPS; COLONOGRAPHY, COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; CONTRAST MEDIA; HUMANS; NEOPLASM RECURRENCE, LOCAL; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 34547602896     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.07.2305     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Desch CE, Benson AB 3rd, Somerfield MR, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology. Colorectal cancer surveillance: 2005 update of an American Society of Clinical Oncology practice guideline. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23:8512-8519
2. Rex DK, Kahi CJ, Levin B, et al. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after cancer resection: a consensus update by the American Cancer Society and US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. CA Cancer J Clin 2006; 56:160-167
3. Fletcher JG, Johnson CD, Krueger WR, et al. Contrast-enhanced CT colonography in recurrent colorectal carcinoma: feasibility of simultaneous evaluation for metastatic disease, local recurrence, and metachronous neoplasia in colorectal carcinoma. AJR 2002; 178:283-290
4. Laghi A, Iannaccone R, Bria E, et al. Contrast-enhanced computed tomographic colonography in the follow-up of colorectal cancer patients: a feasibility study. Eur Radiol 2003; 13:883-889
5. Leonardou P, Striggaris K, Pappas P, et al. Screening of postcolectomy patients: virtual colonography. Abdom Imaging 2006 Sep 22 [Epub ahead of print]
6. You YT, Chang Chien CR, Wang JY, et al. Evaluation of contrast-enhanced computed tomographic colonography in detection of local recurrent colorectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2006; 12:123-126
7. Manfredi S, Bouvier AM, Lepage C, et al. Incidence and patterns of recurrence after resection for cure of colonic cancer in a well defined population. Br J Surg 2006; 93:1115-1122
8. Renehan AG, Egger M, Saunders MP, O' Dwyer ST. Impact on survival of intensive follow-up after curative resection for colorectal cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials. BMJ 2002; 324:813
9. Harris MT, Laudito A, Waye JD. Colonoscopic features of colonic anastomoses. Gastrointest Endosc 1994; 40:554-557
10. Weinstock LB, Shatz BA. Endoscopic abnormalities of the anastomosis following resection of colonic neoplasm. Gastrointest Endosc 1994; 40:558-561
11. Rossini FP, Waye JD. Colonoscopy after colon cancer resection. In: Waye JD, Rex DK, Williams CB, eds. Colonoscopy: principles and practice, 1st ed. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing, 2003:468-477
12. Chari ST, Keate RF. Ileocolonic anastomotic ulcers: a case series and review of the literature. Am J Gastroenterol 2000; 95:1239-1243
13. Peter Z, Bodoky G, Szabo Z, Sonfalvi E, Varga Z, Szilvasi I. Ileocolic anastomotic ulcer after surgery in adulthood: case report and review of the literature. Z Gastroenterol 2004; 42:605-608