Tailoring of outpatient substance abuse treatment to women, 1995-2005

Medical Care

Volumn 45, Issue 8, 2007, Pages 775-780

  Campbell, Cynthia I ^a   Wells, Rebecca ^b,f   Alexander, Jeffrey A ^c   Jiang, Lan ^d   Nahra, Tammie A ^c   Lemak, Christy Harris ^e  

^a DIVISION OF RESEARCH   (United States)

^b IL   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^d PROVIDENCE VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

Health services; Organization; Substance abuse treatment; Women

Indexed keywords

ADDICTION; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR THERAPY; CHILD; CHILD CARE; DEMOGRAPHY; DRUG DEPENDENCE TREATMENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; OUTPATIENT; PRENATAL CARE; SEX DIFFERENCE; STATISTICS; WOMEN'S HEALTH;

BEHAVIOR THERAPY; CHILD; CHILD CARE; DEMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMANS; OUTPATIENTS; PRENATAL CARE; SEX FACTORS; SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT CENTERS; SUBSTANCE-RELATED DISORDERS; WOMEN'S HEALTH;

EID: 34547600563     PISSN: 00257079     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31806518c0     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Greenfield SF. Women and alcohol use disorders. Harv Rev Psychiatry. 2002;10:76-85.
2. Finklestein N. Treatment issues for alcohol- and drug-dependent pregnant and parenting women. Health Soc Work. 1994;19:7-15.
3. Wechsberg WM, Craddock SG, Hubbard RL. How are women who enter substance abuse treatment different than men? A gender comparison from the Drug Abuse Treatment Outcome Study (DATOS). Drugs Soc (New York). 1998;13:97-116.
4. Gutierres S, Todd M. The impact of childhood abuse on treatment outcomes of substance users. Prof Psychol Res Pr. 1997;28:348-354.
5. Finkelstein N. Using the relational model as a context for treating pregnant and parenting chemically-dependent women. In: Underhill BL, Finnegan DG, eds. Chemical Dependency: Women at Risk. New York, NY: The Hawthorne Press; 1996:23-44.
6. Blume SB. Chemical dependency in women: important issues. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 1990;16:297-307.
7. National Data Evaluation Services. Effectiveness of Women's Substance Abuse Treatment Programs: A Meta-Analysis. Center for Substance Abuse Treatment, SAMHSA; 2001. NEDS Analytic Summary #21.
8. Marsh JC, Miller NA. Female clients in substance abuse treatment. Int J Addict. 1985;20:995-1019.
9. Elk R, Mangus LG, LaSoya RJ, et al. Behavioral interventions: effective and. adaptable for the treatment of pregnant cocaine-dependent women. J Drug Issues. 1997;27:625-658.
10. Copeland J, Hall W. A comparison of women seeking drug and alcohol treatment in a specialist women's and two traditional mixed-sex treatment services. Br J Addict. 1992;7:1293-1302.
11. Stevens SJ, Arbiter N. A therapeutic community for substance-abusing pregnant women and women with children: process and outcome. J Psychoactive Drugs. 1995;27:49-56.
12. Metsch LR, Wolfe HP, Fewell R, et al. Treating substance-using women and their children in public housing: preliminary evaluation findings. Child Welfare. 2001;80:199-220.
13. Marsh JC, D'Aunno TA, Smith BD. Increasing access and providing social services to improve drug abuse treatment for women with children. Addiction. 2000;95:1237-1247.
14. Greenfield SF, Brooks AJ, Gordon SM, et al. Substance abuse treatment entry, retention, and outcome in women: a review of the literature. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2007;86:1-21.
15. Marsh JC, Cao D, D'Aunno T. Gender differences in the impact of comprehensive services in substance abuse treatment. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2004;27:289-300.
16. Claus RE, Orwin RG, Kissin W, et al. Does gender-specific substance abuse treatment for women promote continuity of care? J Subst Abuse Treat. 2007;32:27-39.
17. Ashley OS, Marsden ME, Brady TM. Effectiveness of substance abuse treatment programming for women: a review. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2003;29:19-53.
18. Grella CE. Services for perinatal women with substance abuse and mental health disorders: the unmet need. J Psychoactive Drugs. 1997;29:67-78.
19. Sun A-P. Program factors related to women's substance abuse treatment retention and other outcomes: a review and critique. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2006;30:1-20.
20. Friedmann PD, Alexander JA, D'Aunno TA. Organizational correlates of access to primary care and mental health services in drug abuse treatment units. J Subst Abuse Treat. 1999;16:71-80.
21. Campbell CI, Alexander JA. Health services for women in outpatient substance abuse treatment. Health Serv Res. 2005;40:781-810.
22. Grella CE, Greenwell L. Substance abuse treatment for women: changes in the settings where women received treatment and types of services provided, 1987-1998. J Behav Health Serv Res. 2004;31:367-383.
23. Lemak CH, Alexander JA. Managed care and outpatient substance abuse treatment intensity. J Behav Health Ser Res. 2001;28:12-29.
24. Lemak CH, Alexander JA, Roy J. Why do organizations use contingent staffing arrangements? An analysis of market and social influences in the drug treatment sector. J Health Soc Behav. 2003;42:180-197.
25. Alexander JA, Lemak CH. Directors' perceptions of the effects of managed care on outpatient substance abuse treatment. J Subst Abuse. 1997;9:1-14.
26. Alexander JA, Lemak CH. The effects of managed care on administrative burden in outpatient substance abuse treatment organizations. Med Care. 1997;35:1060-1068.
27. Lemak CH, Alexander JA, Campbell C. Administrative burden and its implications for outpatient substance abuse treatment organizations. Psychiatr Serv. 2003;54:705-711.
28. 27a. Adams TA, Heeringa SG. Outpatient substance abuse treatment system surveys (OSATSS): technical documentation for OSATSS-5, 1999-2000. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan; 2001.
29. Campbell CI, Weisner C, Sterling S. Adolescents entering chemical dependency treatment in private managed care: ethnic differences in treatment initiation and retention. J Adolesc Health. 2006;38:343-350.
30. Alvidrez J, Havassy BE. Racial distribution of dual-diagnosis clients in public sector mental health and drug treatment settings. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2005;16:53-62.
31. Kidorf M, Disney E, King V, et al. Challenges in motivating treatment enrollment in community syringe exchange participants. J Urban Health. 2005;82:456-467.
32. Friedmann PD, D'Aunno TA, Jin L, et al. Medical and psychosocial services in drug abuse treatment: do stronger linkages promote client utilization? Health Serv Res. 2000;335:443-465.
33. Liang K-Y, Zeger SL. Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika. 1986;73:13-22.
34. McCullagh P, Nelder JA. Generalized Linear Models. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Chapman & Hall; 1989.
35. Agresti A. Categorical Data Analysis. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Wiley Interscience; 2002.
36. Allen K. Barriers to treatment for addicted African-American women. J Natl Med Assoc. 1995;87:751-756.
37. Copeland J. A qualitative study of barriers to formal treatment among women who self-managed change in addictive behaviors. J Subst Abuse Treat. 1997;14:183-190.
38. Prendergast M, Wellisch J, Falkin G. Assessment of and services for substance-abusing women offenders in community and correctional settings. Prison J. 1995;75:240-256.
39. Woodhouse L. Women with jagged edges: voices from a culture of substance abuse. Qual Health Res. 1992;2:262-281.
40. Dahlgren L, Willander A. Are special treatment facilities for female alcoholics needed? A controlled 2-year follow-up study from a specialized female unit (EWA) versus a mixed male/female treatment facility. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1989;13:499-504.
41. Pettinati H, Rukstalis M, Luck G, et al. Gender and psychiatric comorbidity: impact on clinical presentation of alcohol dependence. Am J Addict. 2000;9:27-39.
42. SAMHSA. National Center for Trauma Informed Care. Available at: http://mentalhealth.samhsa.gov/nctic/. Accessed February 10, 2007.
43. Campbell CI. An Organizational Analysis of Access to Women's Services in Outpatient Substance Abuse Treatment [dissertation]. Ann Arbor, MI: Department of Health Management and Policy, University of Michigan; 2003.