Relationships between chemosensory behaviour and foraging mode within lacertid lizards

Behaviour

Volumn 144, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 83-99

  Verwaijen, D ^a   Van Damme, R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ANTWERP   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Foraging; Lacertidae; Lizard; Senses; Tongue flicking

Indexed keywords

LACERTIDAE; SQUAMATA;

EID: 34547595248     PISSN: 00057959     EISSN: 1568539X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1163/156853907779947373     Document Type: Review

References (67)

1. Amo, L., López, P. & Martín, J. (2005). Chemical assessment of predation risk in the wall lizard, Podareis muralis, is influenced by time exposed to chemical cues of ambush snakes. -Herpetol. J. 15: 21-25.
2. Amo, L., López, P. & Martin, J. (2006). Can wall lizards combine chemical and visual cues to discriminate predatory from, non-predatory snakes inside refuges? - Ethology 112: 478-484.
3. Anderson, R.A. (1993). An analysis of foraging in the lizard, Cnemidophorus tigris. - In: Biology of whiptail lizards (genus Cnemidophorus) (Wright, J.W. & Vitt, L.J., eds). Oklahoma Museum of Natural History, p. 83-116.
4. Aragón, P., López, P. & Martín, J. (200.1). Chemosensory discrimination of familiar and unfamiliar conspecifies by lizards: implications of field spatial relationships between males. - Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 50: 128-133.
5. Arnold, E.N. (1989). Towards a phylogeny and biogeography of the Lacertidae: relationships within an Old-World family of lizards derived from morphology. - Bull. Br. Mus. Nat. Hist. (Zool.) 55: 209-257.
6. Auffenberg, W. (1984). Notes on feeding behaviour of Varanus bengalensis (Sauria: Varanidae). - J. Bomb. Nat. Hist. Soc. 80: 286-302.
7. Blackmer, J.L. & Canas, L.A. (2005). Visual cues enhance the response of Lygus hesperus (Heteroptera: Miridae) to volatiles from host plants. - Environ. Entomol. 34: 1524-1533.
8. Bloch, N. & Irschick, D.J. (2006). An analysis of inter-population divergence in visual display behaviour of the green anole lizard (Anolis carolinensis). - Ethology 112: 370-378.
9. Burghardt, G.M. & Chmura, P.J. (1993). Strike-induced chemosensory searching by ingestively naïve garter snakes (Tamnophis sirtalis). - J. Comp. Psychol. 107: 116-121.
10. Candolin, U. (2003). The use of multiple cues in mate choice. - Biol. Rev. 78: 575-595.
11. Castanzo, R. & Bauer, A. (1993). Diet and activity of Mabuya acutilabris (Reptilia: Scincidae) in Namibia. - Herpetol. J. 3: 130-135.
12. Chiszar, D., Andren, C., Nilson, G., O'Connell, B., Mestas, J.S. Jr. & Smith., H.M. (1982). Strike-induced chemosensory searching in Old World vipers and New World pit vipers. - Anim. Learn. Behav. 10: 121-125.
13. Cooper, W.E. Jr. (1989). Strike-induced chemosensory searching occurs in lizards. - J. Chem. Ecol. 15: 1311-1320.
14. Cooper, W.E. Jr. (1991). Responses to prey chemicals by a lacertid lizard, Podareis muralis: prey chemical discrimination and poststrike elevation in tongue-flick rate. - J. Chem.. Ecol. 17: 849-863.
15. Cooper, WE. Jr. (1992). Prey odor discrimination and poststrike elevation in tongue flicking by a cordylid lizard, Gerrhosaurus nigrolineatus. - Copeia 1992: 146-154.
16. Cooper, W.E. Jr. (1993). Duration of poststrike elevation in tongue-flicking rate in the savan-nah monitor lizard, Varanus exanthematicus. - Ethol. Ecol. Evol. 5: 1-18.
17. Cooper, W.E. Jr. (1994). Prey chemical discrimination, foraging mode, and phylogeny. - In: Lizard Ecology: Historical and Experimental Perspectives (Vitt, L.J. & Pianka, E.R., eds). Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, p. 95-116.
18. Cooper, W.E. Jr. (1995). Prey chemical discrimination and foraging mode in gekkonoid lizards. - Herpetol. Monogr. 9: 120-129.
19. Cooper, W.E. Jr. (1997). Correlated evolution of prey chemical discrimination with foraging, lingual morphology and vomeronasal chemoreceptor abundance in lizards. - Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 41: 257-265.
20. Cooper, W.E. Jr. (1998). Evaluation of swab and related tests as a bioassay for assessing responses by squamate reptiles to chemical stimuli. - J. Chem. Ecol. 24: 841-866.
21. Cooper, W.E. Jr. & Alberts, A.C. (1993). Post-bite elevation in tongue-flick rate by an iguanian lizard, Dipsosaurus dorsalis. - J. Chem. Ecol. 19: 2329-2336.
22. Cooper, W.E. Jr. & Habegger, J.J. (2000). Lingual and biting responses to food chemicals by some eublepharid and gekkonid geckos. - J. Herpetol. 34: 360-368.
23. Cooper, WE. Jr. & Hartdegen, R. (1999). Discriminative response to animal, but not to plant, chemicals by an insectivorous, actively foraging lizard, Scincella lateralis, and differential response to surface and internal prey cues. - J. Chem.. Ecol. 25:1531-1541.
24. Cooper, W.E. Jr., McDowell, S.G. & Ruffer, J. (1989). Strike-induced chemosensory searching in the colubrid snakes Elaphe g. guttata and Thamnophis s. sirtalis. - Ethology 81 : 19-28.
25. Cooper, W.E. Jr. & Pérez-Mellado, V. (2002). Pheromonal discrimations of sex, reproductive condition, and species by the lacertid lizard. Podareis hispánica. - J. Exp. Zool. 292: 523-527.
26. Cooper, W.E. Jr., Vitt, L.J. & Caldwell, J.P. (1994). Movement and substrate tongue-flicks in phrynosomatid lizards. - Copeia 1994: 234-237.
27. Cooper, W.E. Jr. & Whiting, M.J. (1999). Foraging modes in lacertid. lizards from southern Africa. - Amph.-Rept. 20: 299-311.
28. Cooper, W.E. Jr. & Whiting, M.J. (2000). Ambush and active foraging modes both occur in the scincid genus Mabuya. - Copeia 2000: 112-118.
29. Cooper, W.E. Jr. & Van Wyk, J.H. (1994). Absence of prey chemical discrimination by tongue-flicking in an ambush-foraging lizard, having actively foraging ancestors. - Ethology 97: 317-328.
30. Dial, B.E. & Schwenk, K. (1996). Olfaction and predator detection in Coleonyx brevis (Squamata: Eublepharidae), with, comments on the functional significance of buccal pulsing in geckos. - J. Exp. Zool. 276: 415-424.
31. Diaz-Uriarte, R. & Garland, T. Jr. (1998). Effects of branch length errors on the performance of phylogenetically independent contrasts. - Syst. Biol. 47: 654-672.
32. Evans, L.T. (1961). Structure as related to behavior in the organization of populations of rep-tiles. - In: Vertebrate speciation (Blair, W.F., ed.). University of Texas Press, Houston, p. 148-178.
33. Felsenstein, J. (1985). Phylogenies and the comparative method. - Am. Nat. 125: 1-15.
34. Fu, J. (2000). Toward the phylogeny of the family Lacertidae - Why 4708 base pairs of mtDNA sequences cannot draw the picture. - Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 71: 203-217.
35. Garland, T. Jr., Dickerman, A.W., Janis, C.M. & Jones, J.A. (1993). Phylogenetic analysis of covariance by computer simulation. - Syst. Biol. 42: 265-292.
36. Garland, T. Jr., Harvey, PH. & Ives, A.R. (1992). Procedures for the analysis of comparative data using phylogenetically independent contrasts. - Syst. Biol. 41: 18-32.
37. Hagelin, J.C. (2004). Observations on the olfactory ability of the Kakapo Strigops habroptilus, the critically endangered parrot of New Zealand. - Ibis 146: 161-164.
38. Halpern, M. (1992). Nasal chemical senses in reptiles: structure and function. - In: Biology of the Reptilia, vol. 18, Brain, hormones, and. behavior (Gans, C. & Crews, D., eds). University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, p. 423-523.
39. Hamilton, P.S. & Sullivan, B.K. (2005). Female mate attraction in ornate tree lizards, Urosaurus ornatus: a multivariate analysis. - Anim. Behav. 69: 219-224.
40. Hartman, E.J. & Abrahams, M. V. (2000). Sensory compensation and the detection of preda-tors: the interaction between chemical and visual information. - Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 267: 571-575.
41. Harvey, R.H. & Pagel, M.D. (eds) (1991). The comparative method in evolutionary biology. - Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
42. Helfman, G.S. ( 1989). Threat-sensitive predator avoidance in damselfish-trumpetfish interac-tions. - Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 24: 47-58.
43. Herrel, A., Canbek, M., Özelmas, Ü., Uyanoglu, M. & Karakaya, M. (2005). Comparative functional analysis of the hyolingual anatomy in lacertid lizards. - Anatom. Rec. A 284: 561-573.
44. Huey, R.B. & Pianka, E.R. (1981). Ecological consequences of foraging mode. - Ecology 62: 991-999.
45. Huey, R.B. & Pianka, E.R. (2006). Preface: On Widely Foraging for Kalahari Lizards. Feeding Ecology in the Natural World. Preface. - In: Foraging behavior in lizards (Reilly, S.M., McBrayer, L.D. & Miles, D.B., eds). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
46. Kimchi, T. & Terkel, J. (2001). Spatial learning and memory in the blind mole-rat in comparison with the laboratory rat and Levant vole. - Anim. Behav. 61: 171-180.
47. Kolkovski, S., Arielli, A. & Tandler, A. (1997). Visual and chemical cues stimulate microdiet ingestion in sea bream larvae. - Aquacult. Intern. 5: 527-536.
48. López, P. & Martín, J. (2001). Pheromonal recognition of females takes precedence over the chromatic cue in male Iberian wall lizards Podareis hispanica. - Ethology 107: 901-912.
49. Maddison, W.P. & Maddison, D.R. (2005). Mesquite: a modular system for evolutionary analysis. -.http://mesquiteproject.org/.
50. Midford, P.E., Garland, T. Jr. & Maddison, W. (2002). PDAP:PDTREE: module of Mesquite. - Available at: http://mesquiteproject.org/pdap_.mesquite/ index.html.
51. Mollon, J.D. & Regan, B.C. (1999). The spectral distribution of primate cones and of the macular pigment: matched to properties of the world? - J. Opt. Techn. 66: 847-852.
52. Nicoletto, PF. (1985a). The relative roles of vision and olfaction in prey detection by the ground skink, Scincella lateralis. - J. Herpetol. 19: 411-415.
53. Nicoletto, PF. (1985b). The roles of vision and the chemical senses in predatory behavior of the skink, Scincella lateralis. - J. Herpetol. 19: 487-491.
54. O'Connell, B., Greenlee, R., Bacon, J., Smith., H.M. & Chiszar, D. (1985). Strike-induced chemosensory searching in elapid snakes (cobras, taipans, tiger snakes, and death adders) at San Diego Zoo. - Psychol. Rec. 35: 431-436.
55. Ord, TJ., Blumstein, D.T. & Evans, C.S. (2002). Ecology and signal evolution in lizards. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 77: 127-148.
56. Perry, G. (1999). The evolution of search modes: ecological versus phylogenetic perspectives. - Am. Nat. 153: 98-109.
57. Perry, G. (2006). Movement patterns in lizards: measurement, modality, and behavioral correlates. - In: Foraging behavior in lizards (Reilly, S.M., McBrayer, L.D. & Miles, D.B., eds). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
58. Perry, G., Lampl, I., Lerner, A., Rothenstein, D., Shani, E., Sivan, N. & Werner, Y.L. (1990). Foraging mode in lacertid lizards: variations and correlates. - Amph.-Rept. 1.1: 373384.
59. Pianka, E.R., Huey, R.B. & Lawler, L.R. (1979). Niche segregation in desert lizards. - In: Analysis of ecological systems (Horn, J.D., Mitchell, R.D. & Stains, G.R., eds). Ohio State University Press, Columbus, OH, p. 67-115.
60. Raguso, R.A. & Willis, M.A. (2005). Synergy between visual and. olfactory cues in nectar feeding by wild hawkmoths, Manduca sexta. - Anim. Behav. 69: 407-418.
61. Regal, P.J. (1978). Behavioral differences between reptiles and mammals: an analysis of activity and mental capabilities. - In: Behavior and neurology of lizards (Greenberg, N. & MacLean, P.D., eds). Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Washington, DC, p.l83-202.
62. Schwenk, K. (1993). The evolution of chemoreception in Squamate reptiles: a phylogenetic approach. - Brain Behav. Evol. 41: 124-137.
63. Schwenk, K. (1994). Why snakes have forked tongues. - Sci. 263: 1573-1577.
64. Simon, CA., Gravelle, K., Bissinger, B.E., Eiss, I. & Ruibal, R. (1981). The role of chemoreception in the iguanid lizard Sceloporus jarrovi. - Anim. Behav. 29: 46-54.
65. Thoen, C., Bauwens, D. & Verheyen, R.F. (1986). Chemoreceptive and behavioural responses of the common lizard Lacerta vivipara to snake chemical deposits. - Anim. Behav. 34: 1805-1813.
66. Van Damme, R. & Quick, K. (2001). Use of predator chemical cues by three species of lacertid lizards (Lacerta bedriagae, Podareis tiliguerta, and Podareis sicula). - J. Herpetol. 35: 27-36.
67. Verbeek, B. (1972). Ethologische Untersuchungen an einiger europäische Eidechsen. -Bonn. Zool. Beitr. 23: 122-151.