The search experience variable in information behavior research

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology

Volumn 58, Issue 10, 2007, Pages 1529-1546

  Moore, Joi L ^a   Erdelez, Sanda ^a   He, Wu ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ELECTRONIC INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; INFORMATION BEHAVIOR RESEARCH; SEARCH EXPERIENCES; TERMINOLOGY USAGE;

COMPUTER SCIENCE; CONTEXT SENSITIVE GRAMMARS; ELECTRONIC DATA INTERCHANGE; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL SYSTEMS; SEARCH ENGINES;

INFORMATION USE;

EID: 34547581068     PISSN: 15322882     EISSN: 15322890     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/asi.20635     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Bilal, D. (2001). Children's use of the Yahooligans! Web search engine: Cognitive and physical behaviors on research tasks. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(2), 118-136.
2. Borgman, C.L. (1986). Why are online catalogs hard to use? Lessons learned from information retrieval studies. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 37(6), 387-400.
3. Borgman, C.L. (1989). All users of information retrieval systems are not created equal: An exploration into individual differences. Information Processing & Management, 25(3), 237-251.
4. Dalrymple, P.W., & Zweizig, D.L. (1992). Users' experience of information retrieval systems: An exploration of the relationship between search experience and affective measures. Library & Information Science Research, 14, 167-181.
5. Fenichel, C.H. (1979). Online information retrieval: Identification of measures that discriminate among users with different levels and types of experience. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Drexel University, Philadelphia.
6. Fenichel, C.H. (1981). Online searching: Measures that discriminate among users with different types of experiences. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 32(1), 23-32.
7. Fidel, R., & Soergel, D. (1983). Factors affecting online bibliographic retrieval: A conceptual framework for research. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 34(3), 163-180.
8. Ford, N., Miller, D., & Moss, N. (2001). The role of individual differences in Internet searching: An empirical study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(12), 1049-1066.
9. Harter, S.P. (1984). Online searching styles: An exploratory study. College & Research Libraries, 45, 249-258.
10. Hoelscher, C., & Strube, G. (2000). Web search behavior of Internet experts and newbies. Computer Networks, 33, 337-346.
11. Howard, H. (1982). Measures that discriminate among online users with different training and experience. Online Review, 6, 315-326.
12. Hsieh-Yee, I. (1993). Effects of search experience and subject knowledge on the search tactics of novice and experienced searchers. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 44(3), 161-174.
13. Jacobson, T., & Fusani, D. (1992). Computer, system, and subject knowledge in novice searching of a full-text, multifile database. Library & Information Science Research, 14(1), 97-106.
14. Jansen, B.J., & Pooch, U. (2001). A review of Web searching studies and a framework for future research. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(3), 235-246.
15. Jonassen, D.H., & Erdelez, S. (2005). Usability of case libraries by teachers. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 22(2), 67-74.
16. Kachigan, S.K. (1986). Statistical analysis. New York: Radius Press.
17. King, N.S. (1991). Search characteristics and the effects of experience on end users of PaperChase. College and Research Libraries, 52(4), 360-374.
18. Lazonder, A.W., Biemans, H.J.A., & Woperis, G.J.H. (2000). Differences between novice and experienced users in searching information on the World Wide Web. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51(6), 576-581.
19. Lucas, W., & Topi, H. (2004). Training for Web search: Will it get you in shape? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(13), 1183-1198.
20. Madjid, L., Stephane, C., & Daniel, M. (2003). The effect of individual differences on searching the Web. Proceedings of the 66th annual meeting of the ASIS (Vol. 40, pp. 240-246). Medford, NJ: Information Today.
21. Marchionini, G., Dwiggins, S., Katz, A., & Lin, X. ( 1993). Information seeking in full-text end-user-oriented search systems: The roles of domain and search expertise. Library & Information Science Research, 15, 35-69.
22. Marchionini, G., Lin, X., & Dwiggins, S. (1990). Effects of search and subject expertise on information seeking in a hypertext environment. Proceedings of the 53rd annual meeting of the ASIS (Vol. 27, pp. 129-142).
23. Meadow, C.T., Marchionini, G., & Cherry, J.M. (1994). Speculations on the measurement and use of user characteristics in information retrieval experimentation. Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science, 19(4), 5-7.
24. Meadow, C.T., Wang, J., & Yuan, W. (1995). A study of user performance and attitudes with information retrieval interfaces. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 46(7), 490-505.
25. Navarro-Prieto, R., Scaife, M., & Rogers, Y. (1999). Cognitive strategies in Web searching. Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Human Factors and the Web. Retrieved May 13, 2007, from http://zing.ncsl.nist.gov/hfweb/ proceedings/navarro.prieto/index.html
26. Palmquist, R., & Kim, K.S. (2000). Cognitive style and online database search experience as predictors of Web search performance. Journal of American Society for Information Science, 51(6), 558-566.
27. Penniman, W.D. (1981). Modeling and evaluation of on-line user behavior. Final Report to the National Library of Medicine. Dublin, OH: OCLC.
28. Penniman, W.D. (1982). Modeling and evaluation of on-line user behavior. Proceedings of the annual meeting of the ASIS (Vol. 19, pp. 231-235). Columbus, OH.
29. Qiu, L. (1993). Markov models of search state patterns in a hypertext information retrieval system. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 44(7), 413-427.
30. Siegfried, S., Bates, M.J., & Wilde, D.N. (1993). A profile of end-user searching behavior by humanities scholars: The Getty Online Searching Project Report No. 2. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 44(5), 273-291.
31. Turner, P.M., Kaske, N.K., & Baker, G.S. (1990). The effects of baud rate, performance anxiety, and experience on online bibliographic searches. Information Technology and Libraries, 9, 34-42.
32. Wolfram, D., & Dimitroff, A. (1998). Hypertext vs. Boolean-based searching in a bibliographic database environment: A direct comparison of searcher performance. Information Processing & Management, 34(6), 669-679.
33. Yuan, W. (1997). End-user searching behavior in information retrieval: A longitudinal study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48(3), 218-234.
34. Yuan, W., & Meadow, C.T. (1999). A study of the use of variables in information retrieval user studies. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(3), 140-150.
35. Zhang, X., & Chignell, M. (2001). Assessment of the effects of user characteristics on mental models of information retrieval systems. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 52(6), 445-459.