메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 83, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 643-653

Is the United States in decline - again? An essay

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords


EID: 34547551778     PISSN: 00205850     EISSN: 14682346     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2346.2007.00645.x     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (56)

References (6)
  • 1
    • 0035454037 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • pp. See
    • New Political Economy 6 : 3, 2001, pp. 311 40.
    • (2001) New Political Economy , vol.6 , Issue.3 , pp. 311-40
  • 2
    • 33846136432 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Still the American Empire
    • pp. For a flavour of Kissinger's views on the world at large and America's role in it by the late 1960s, see his American foreign policy: three essays (New York: 1969). See Jussi M. Hanhimaki, The flawed architect: Henry Kissinger and American foreign policy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004). For an example of this then popular academic view, see Stanley Hofmann, Primacy or world order? American foreign policy since the Cold War (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1979). For one of the more sophisticated theoretical critiques of the decline thesis - though one that sometimes makes too much of too little - see Stephen Gill, American hegemony and the Trilateral Commission (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990). I discussed this much earlier in 'Whatever happened to the second Cold War? Soviet-American relations, 1980-1988'
    • Michael Cox Still the American Empire Political Studies Review 5, 2007, pp. 1 10.
    • (2007) Political Studies Review , vol.5 , pp. 1-10
    • Cox, M.1
  • 3
    • 0025362761 scopus 로고
    • pp. For some idea of how influential Kennedy was in the late 1980s, see the reviews of his work by Michael Howard, 'Imperial cycles: bucks, bullets and bust', New York Review of Books, 10 Jan. 1988, and Peter Schmeisser, 'Taking stock: is America in decline?', New York Times Magazine, 17 April 1988. Joseph Nye, Bound to lead: the changing nature of American power (New York: Basic Books, 1990). Richard Haass, 'The use (and mainly misuse) of history', Orbis 32: 3, 1988, pp. 76-96. Henry Nau, The myth of America's decline: leading the world economy in the 1980s (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990).
    • Review of International Studies 16 : 2, 1990, pp. 155 72.
    • (1990) Review of International Studies , vol.16 , Issue.2 , pp. 155-72
  • 4
    • 84935413402 scopus 로고
    • The US: decline or renewal
    • pp. For a consistent declinist view of the United States written in the midst of the new hubris, see Donald W. White, The American century: the rise and decline of the United States as a world power (New Haven, CT and London: Yale University Press, 1996). See Bruce Cumings, 'Still the American century', in Michael Cox, Ken Booth and Tim Dunne, eds, The interregnum: controversies in world politics, 1989-1999 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999), pp. 271-99. Charles Krauthammer, 'The unipolar moment', Foreign Affairs 70: 1, 1991, pp. 23-33.
    • Samuel Huntington The US: decline or renewal Foreign Affairs 62 : 2, 1988-9, pp. 76 96.
    • (1988) Foreign Affairs , vol.62 , Issue.2 , pp. 76-96
    • Huntington, S.1
  • 5
    • 0242370104 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • America's imperial dilemma
    • pp. See Nicholas Lehmann, 'The next world order: the Bush Doctrine may have a brand new doctrine of power', New Yorker, 4 April 2002. See Jack Snyder, Myths of empire: domestic politics and international ambition (Ithaca, NY, and London: Cornell University Press, 1991); Charles A. Kupchan, The vulnerability of empire (Ithaca, NY, and London: Cornell University Press, 1994). See Richard Ned Lebow, The tragedy of politics: ethics, interests and orders (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003). Still the best in my view is Michael Mann, Incoherent empire (London: Verso, 2003). Chalmers Johnson, The sorrows of empire: militarism, secrecy and the end of the republic (London: Verso, 2004). Michael Lind, 'Beyond American hegemony', The National Interest, May-June 2007, pp. 9-15. Christopher Layne, 'Impotent power?
    • Dimtri K. Simes America's imperial dilemma Foreign Affairs 82 : 6, 2003, pp. 91 102.
    • (2003) Foreign Affairs , vol.82 , Issue.6 , pp. 91-102
    • Simes, D.K.1
  • 6
    • 20744434458 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Beyond the West: terrors in Transatlantia
    • pp. See G. John Ikenberry, 'Unilateralism in US foreign policy: what role does America see for Europe?', unpublished manuscript, 1 June 2007. For one rather alarmist account, by a realist critic of the Bush administration, of what a rising China might mean for the world, see John Mearsheimer in debate with Zbigniew Brzezinski in 'Clash of the Titans', Foreign Policy, no. 146, Jan.-Feb. 2006, pp. 46-50. See 'Come in number one, your time is up', The Economist, 14 April 2007, p. 12. See Economic mobility: is the American Dream alive and well? (Washington DC: Economic Mobility Project, 2007), p. 7. e.g. Emmanuel Todd, in his otherwise prescient After the empire: the breakdown of the order (London: Constable, 2004), and Immanuel Wallerstein in his much less convincing The decline of American power (New York and London: New Press, 2003).
    • Michael Cox Beyond the West: terrors in Transatlantia European Journal of International Relations 11 : 2, 2005, pp. 203 33.
    • (2005) European Journal of International Relations , vol.11 , Issue.2 , pp. 203-33
    • Michael, C.1


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.