Recent work on aesthetics of science

International Studies in the Philosophy of Science

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 7-11

  McAllister, James W ^a  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34547539445     PISSN: 02698595     EISSN: 14699281     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02698590120118783     Document Type: Review

References (44)

1. AERTS, D., MATHIJS, E. & MOSSELMAN, B. (Eds) (1999) Science and Art (Dordrecht, Kluwer)
2. BAIGRIE, B. (1996) Picturing Knowledge: Historical and Philosophical Problems Concerning the Use of Art in Science (Toronto, University of Toronto Press)
3. DASTON, L. & GALISON, P. (1992) The image of objectivity, Representations, 40, pp. 81-128
4. DASTON, L. & PARK, K. (1998) Wonders and the Order of Nature, 1150-1750 (New York, Zone Books)
5. DAVIES, D. (1998) McAllister's aesthetics in science: a critical notice, International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 12, pp. 25-32
6. DURAND, S. (1994) L'Esthétique scientifique: commentaire sur la Grande Unification, Horizons Philosophiques, 5, pp. 31-46
7. ELGIN, C.Z. (1996) Considered Judgment (Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press)
8. EMMER, M. (Ed.) (1993) The Visual Mind: Art and Mathematics (Cambridge, MA, MIT Press)
9. ENGLER, G. (2001) Quantum field theories and aesthetic disparity, International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 15, pp. 51-63
10. FISCHER, E.P. (1999) Beauty and the Beast: The Aesthetic Moment in Science, trans. E. Oehlkers (New York, Plenum)
11. FLANNERY, M.C. (1992) Biology is beautiful, Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 35, pp. 422-435
12. FRAASSEN, B.C. VAN (1994) Interpretation of science; science as interpretation, in: J. HILGEVOORD (Ed.) Physics and Our View of the World (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press), pp. 169-187
13. FUDGE, R.S. (2001) Imagination and the science-based appreciation of unscenic nature, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 59, pp. 275-285
14. GALISON, P. (1998) Judgment against objectivity, in: JONES & GALISON (1998), pp. 327-359
15. GILBERT, S.F. & FABER, M. (1996) Looking at embryos: the visual and conceptual aesthetics of emerging form, in: TAUBER (1996), pp. 125-151
16. GRÜNFELD, J. (2000) Soft Logic: The Epistemic Role of Aesthetic Criteria (Lanham, MD, University Press of America)
17. GUPTA, K.C. (Ed.) (1996) Aesthetics and Motivations in Arts and Science (New Delhi, New Age International)
18. HOLMES, F.L. (2001) Meselson, Stahl, and the Replication of DNA: A History of the "Most Beautiful Experiment in Biology" (New Haven, CT, Yale University Press)
19. JARDINE, N. (2000) The Scenes of Inquiry: On the Reality of Questions in the Sciences, 2nd edn (Oxford, Clarendon Press)
20. JONES, C.A. & GALISON, P. (Eds) (1998) Picturing Science, Producing Art (New York, Routledge)
21. KEMP, M. (2000) Visualizations: The "Nature" Book of Art and Science (Oxford, Oxford University Press)
22. KOHN, D. (1996) The aesthetic construction of Darwin's theory, in: TAUBER (1996), pp. 13-48
23. KUIPERS, T.A.F. (in press) Beauty, a road to the truth?, Synthese
24. MAINZER, K. (1995) Symmetry and beauty in arts and mathematical sciences, Physis, 32, pp. 91-103
25. MAYNARD SMITH, J. (1999) Too good to be true, Nature, 400, p. 223
26. MAZZOLINI, R. (Ed.) (1993) Non-verbal Communication in Science Prior to 1900 (Florence, Leo S. Olschki)
27. MCALLISTER, J.W. (1996) Beauty and Revolution in Science (Ithaca, NY, Cornell University Press)
28. MCALLISTER, J.W. (1998) Is beauty a sign of truth in scientific theories?, American Scientist, 86, pp. 174-183
29. MCALLISTER, J.W. (in press) Mathematical beauty and the evolution of the standards of mathematical proof, in: M. EMMER (Ed.) The Visual Mind 2 (Cambridge, MA, MIT Press)
30. MCALLISTER, J.W. (in preparation) Emotions, rationality, and decision making in science
31. MILLER, A.I. (1996) Insights of Genius: Imagery and Creativity in Science and Art (New York, Copernicus)
32. MOSER, S. (1998) Ancestral Images: The Iconography of Human Origins (Ithaca, NY, Cornell University Press)
33. PANG, A. (1998) Technology, aesthetics, and the development of astrophotography at the Lick Observatory, in: T. LENOIR (Ed.) Inscribing Science: Scientific Texts and the Materiality of Communication (Stanford, CA, Stanford University Press), pp. 223-248
34. PARSONS, G.G. & RUEGER, A. (2000) The epistemic significance of appreciating experiments aesthetically, British Journal of Aesthetics, 40, pp. 407-423
35. REEVES, E. (1997) Painting the Heavens: Art and Science in the Age of Galileo (Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press)
36. REGT, H.W. DE (1998) Explaining the splendour of science, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 29, pp. 155-165
37. ROTA, G.-C. (1997) The phenomenology of mathematical beauty, Synthese, 111, pp. 172-182
38. RUEGER, A. (1997) Experiments, nature and aesthetic experience in the eighteenth century, British Journal of Aesthetics, 37, pp. 305-322
39. SARKAR, S. (1996) Form and function in the molecularization of biology, in: TAUBER (1996), pp. 153-168
40. TAUBER, A.I. (Ed.) (1996) The Elusive Synthesis: Aesthetics and Science (Dordrecht, Kluwer)
41. THAGARD, P. (in press) The passionate scientist: emotion in scientific cognition, in: P. CARRUTHERS, S. STICH & M. SIEGAL (Eds) The Cognitive Basis of Science (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press)
42. THOMAS, A. (1998) Beauty of Another Order: Photography in Science (New Haven, CT, Yale University Press)
43. WARTOFSKY, M.W. (1994) Science and art: heuristic and aesthetic dimensions of scientific discovery, Philosophic Exchange, 24/25, pp. 5-12
44. WU, Z.C. (1997) The beauty of general relativity, Foundations of Science, 2, pp. 61-64