An investigation into the efficacy of the studio model at the high school level

Journal of Educational Computing Research

Volumn 35, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 45-59

  Faro, Salvatore ^a,c   Swan, Karen ^b  

^a Ballston Spa High School ^*  (United States)

^b KENT STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34547537941     PISSN: 07356331     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2190/G6P7-1731-X1H7-38U2     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Jackson, L., & Caffarella, R. (1994). Experiential learning: A new approach. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
2. Johnson, D., & Johnson, R. (1992). Implementing cooperative learning. Contemporary Education, 63(3), 173-180.
3. Johnson, D., & Johnson, R. (1999). Making cooperative learning work, Theory Into Practice, 38(2), 67-73.
4. Johnson, W., &, Johnson, R. (1989). Cooperation and competition: Theory and Research. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.
5. Johnson, W., Johnson, R., & Smith, K. (1991). Cooperative learning: Increasing College Faculty Instructional Productivity. Washington, DC: George Washington University Press.
6. Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning. Experience as the source of learning and development Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
7. Lee, M.. (1993). Gender, group composition, and peer interaction in computer-based cooperative learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 2(4), 549-577.
8. Lister, B. (1998). Interactive distance learning: The virtual studio classroom. Renssselaer Polytechnic Institute. Retrieved May 22, 2006 from http://www.ciue.rpi.edu/pdfs/IDLtheVirtualStudioClassroom.pdf
9. Lister, B. (2001). Next generation studio: A new model of interactive learning. Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute. Retrieved May 22, 2006 from http://www.ciue.rpi.edu/pdfs/nextGenStudio.pdf.
10. McMillan, J., & Schumacher, S. (1997). Research in education: A conceptual introduction (4th ed.). New York: Addison-Wesley Educational Publishers Inc.
11. No Child Left Behind Act. of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-110, 115 Stat, 1425 (2002). Retrieved June 1, 2005, from http://www.ed.gov/legislation/ESEA.02/
12. Silverman, D. (1993). Interpreting qualitative data: Methods for analyzing talk, text, and interviews. London: Sage.
13. Slavin, R. E. (1980). Cooperative learning in teams: State of the art. Educational Psychologist, 15(2), 93-111.
14. Slavin, R. E. (1996). Cooperative learning in middle and secondary schools. The Clearing House, 69(A), 200-205.
15. Slavin, R. E., & Cooper, R. (1999). Improving intergroup relations: Lessons learned from cooperative learning programs. Journal of Social Issues, 55(A), 647-663.
16. Slavin, R. E., & Tanner, A. M. (1979). Effects of cooperative reward structures and individual accountability on productivity and learning. Journal of Educational Research, 72, 294-298.
17. Thorndike, R. (1997). Measurement and evaluation in psychology and education (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
18. Wilson, J. (1994). The Cuple Physics Studio. The Physics Teacher, 32, 518-526.
19. Wilson, J. (1997). Re-engineering undergraduate education, In The learning revolution. Bolton, MA: Anker Publishing Co.
20. Wilson, J., & Jennings, W. (2000). Studio courses: How information technology is changing the way we teach, on campus and off. Proceedings of the IEEE, 88(1), 72-80.