An endangered species act for literacy education

Journal of Literacy Research

Volumn 39, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 145-162

  Pearson, P David ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34547518136     PISSN: 1086296X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10862960701331878     Document Type: Review

References (37)

1. Allington, R. L. (2005). Federal intrusion in research and teaching and the medical model myth. In J. Carlson & J. Levin (Eds.), The case of No Child Left Behind legislation: Educational research and federal funding (pp. 37-48). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
2. Betts, E. A. (1946). Foundations of reading instruction. New York: American Book.
3. Bloom, B. S. (1968). Learning for mastery. Evaluation Comment, 1.
4. Carroll, J. (1963). A model of school learning. Teachers College Record, 64, 723-732.
5. Cattell, J. M. (1906). Conceptions and methods of psychology. In H. J. Rogers (Ed.), Congress of arts and science, Universal Exposition, St. Louis, 1904: Vol. 5 (pp. 593-604). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
6. Committee on How People Learn, A Targeted Report for Teachers. (2005). In M. S. Donovan & J. D. Bransford (Eds.), How students learn: History, mathematics, and science in the classroom. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
7. Darling-Hammond, L. (1996). What matters most: Teaching for America's future. New York: National Commission on Teaching & America's Future.
8. DIBELS data system. (2006). Retrieved November 10, 2006, from https://dibels.uoregon.edu/data/index.php
9. Dorr-Bremme, D., & Herman, J. (1983). Assessing student achievement: A profile of classroom practices. Los Angeles: University of California, Los Angeles Center for the Study of Evaluation.
10. Finn, C. E., & Kanstoroom, M. (2000). Improving, empowering, dismantling. Washington, DC: The Fordham Foundation. Retrieved November 6, 2006, from http://www.fordhamfoundation.org/institute/publication/publicatio~n. cfm?id=101
11. Gagné, R. M. (1965). The conditions of learning. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
12. Galton, F. (1865). Hereditary talent and character. Macmillan's Magazine, 12, 157-166, 318-327.
13. Gates, A. I. (1927). The improvement of reading. New York: Macmillan.
14. Gates, A. I. (1937). The necessary mental age for beginning reading. Elementary School Journal, 38, 497-498.
15. Good, R. H., & Kaminski, R. A. (Eds.). (2002). Dynamic indicators of basic early literacy skills (6th ed.). Eugene, OR: Institute for the Development of Educational Achievement. Available from http://dibels.uoregon.edu
16. Gray, W. S. (1937). A review of C. R. Stone, Better primary reading: How to adapt reading instruction to the varying needs of the children. The Elementary School Journal, 38, 73-74.
17. Haladyna, T. M., Nolan, S. B., & Haas, N. S. (1991). Raising standardized achievement test scores and the origins of test score pollution. Educational Researcher, 20, 2-7.
18. Harste, J., Burke, C., & Woodward, V. (1984). Language stories and literacy lessons. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
19. Herman, J., & Golan, S. (1991). Effects of standardized testing on teachers and learning-another look (CSE Tech. Rep. No. 334). Los Angeles: Center for the Study of Evaluation.
20. Improving America's Schools Act of 1994, Pub. L. No. 103-382, 108 Stat. 3518 et. seq. (1994). Retrieved December 12, 2006, from http://www.ed.gov/legislation/ESEA/index.html
21. Johnson, D. D., & Pearson, P. D. (1975). Skills management systems: A critique. The Reading Teacher, 28, 757-764.
22. Kelly, W. (1953). The Pogo papers. New York: Simon & Schuster.
23. Kilgallon, P. A. (1942). A study of the relationships among certain pupil adjustments in reading situations. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Pennsylvania State College.
24. Klausmeier, R. A., Rossmiller, R. A., & Saily, M. (Eds.). (1977). Individually guided elementary education: Concepts and practices. New York: Academic.
25. Linn, R. L. (2000). Assessments and accountability. Educational Researcher, 29(2), 4-16.
26. McGill-Franzen, A., Zmach, C., Solic, K., & Zeig, J. L. (2006). The confluence of two policy mandates: Core reading programs and third-grade retention in Florida. Elementary School Journal, 107(1), 67-91.
27. National Board for Professional Teaching Standards. (2006). The five core propositions. Retrieved November 10, 2006, from http://www.nbpts.org/ the_standards/the_five_core_propositio
28. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel: Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction: Reports of the subgroups. Washington, DC: Author.
29. No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-110, 115 Stat. 1425. (2002). Retrieved April 10, 2003, from http://www.ed.gov/offices/OESE/esea
30. O'Connor, R. E., Bell, K. M., Harty, K. R., Larkin, L. K., Sackor, S. M., & Zigmond, N. (2002). Teaching reading to poor readers in the intermediate grades: A comparison of text difficulty. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(3), 474-485).
31. Otto, W. (1977). The Wisconsin design; A reading program for individually guided elementary education. In R. A. Klausmeier, R. A. Rossmiller, & M. Saily (Eds.), Individually guided elementary education: Concepts and practices (pp. 216-237). New York: Academic.
32. Otto, W., & Chester, R. D. (1976). Objective-based reading. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
33. Shanahan, T. (Ed.). (1983). Edited version of P. A. Killgallon, A study of relationships among certain pupil adjustments in reading situations. In L. Gentile, M. L. Kamil, & J. Blanchard (Eds.), Reading research revisited (pp. 553-556). Columbus, OH: Merrill.
34. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Post-Secondary Education, Office of Planning and Innovation. (2002). Meeting the highly qualified teachers challenge: The secretary's annual report on teacher quality. Washington, DC: Author.
35. Veatch, J. (1960). In defense of individualized reading. Elementary English, 37, 227-234.
36. Walsh, K., & Tracy, C. O. (2006). Increasing the odds: How good policies can yield better teachers. Washington, DC: National Council on Teacher Quality.
37. Wundt, W. M. (1896-1897). Outlines of psychology (C. H. Judd., Trans.). Retrieved December 10, 2006, from http://www.hyorku.ca/dept/psych/ classics/Wundt/Outlines/