Estimation procedure for J and CTOD fracture parameters using three-point bend specimens

Proceedings of the Biennial International Pipeline Conference, IPC

Volumn 3 PART A, Issue , 2007, Pages 149-158

  Donato, Gustavo H B ^a   Ruggieri, Claudio ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; NONLINEAR ANALYSIS; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; PLASTIC PRODUCTS;

CRACK MOUTH OPENING DISPLACEMENT; CTOD FRACTURE PARAMETERS; PLASTIC ROTATIONAL FACTORS; THREE POINT BEND SPECIMENS;

FRACTURE MECHANICS;

EID: 34547503893     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. Joyce, J.A. (ed.), Elastic-Plastic Fracture Test Methods; The User'sExperieuce. ASTMSTP1114, American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, 1991.
2. Parks, D.M., "Advances in Characterization of Elastic-Plastic Crack-Tip Fields," in Topics in Fracture and Fatigue, A. S. Argon, Ed., Springer Verlag, pp. 59-98, 1992.
3. Nevalainen, M., and Dodds, R. H. "Numerical Investigation of 3-D Constraint Effects on Brittle Fracture in SE(B) and C(T) Specimens," International Journal of Fracture, Vol 74, pp. 131-161, 1995.
4. Hutchinson, J.W., "Fundamentals of the Phenomenological Theory of Nonlinear Fracture Mechanics,"JournalofApplied Mechanics, Vol. 50, pp. 1042-1051, 1983.
5. Eiber, R. J. and Kiefner, J. F. "Failure of Pipelines", in Metals Handbook, Ninth Edition, Vol. 11 - Failure Analysis and Prevention, American Society for Metals, pp. 695-706, 1986.
6. American Welding Society, "Welding Handbook: Welding Technology", Eighth Edition, Volume 1, Miami, 1987.
7. National Energy Board, "Stress Corrosion Cracking on Canadian Oil and Gas Pipelines", Report MH-2-95, Calgary, 1996.
8. Anderson, T. L. Fracture Mechanics: Fundaments and Applications - 3rd Edition, CRC Press, New York, 2005.
9. British Standard Institution. "Guide on Methods for Assessing the Acceptability of Flaws in Metallic Structures," BS7910, 1999.
10. American Petroleum Institute. "Recommended Practice for Fitness-for-Service." API RP-579, 2000.
11. SINTAP: Structural Integrity Assessment Procedure for European Industry. Final Revision. EU-Project BE 95-1462, 1999.
12. American Society of Mechanical Engineers. "ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code." Section XI, 2004.
13. British Standard, "Fracture Mechanics Toughness Tests", BS 7448, 1991.
14. American Society for Testing and Materials, "Standard Test Method for Crack-Tip Opening Displacement (CTOD) Fracture Toughness Measurement", ASTM E1290, 1993.
15. American Society for Testing and Materials, "Standard Test Method for Measurement of Fracture Toughness", ASTM E1820, 1996.
16. Koppenhoefer, K., Gullerud, A., Ruggieri, C., Dodds, R. and Healy, B. "WARP3D: Dynamic Nonlinear Analysis of Solids Using a Preconditioned Conjugate Gradient Software Architecture." Structural Research Series (SRS) 596. UILU-ENG-94-2017. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. 1994.
17. Moran, B., and Shih, C.F., "A General Treatment of Crack Tip Contour Integrals", International Journal of Fracture, Vol. 35, pp. 295-310, 1987.
18. Ohata, M., The Effect of Specimen Geometry on CTOD - Values Based Upon the Local Approach, Ms.C. Thesis, Department of Manufactirung Science, Osaka University, 1993 (In Japanese).
19. Kirk, M. and Dodds, R. H., "J and CTOD Estimation Equations for Shallow Cracks in Single Edge Notch Bend Specimens," Journal of Testing and Evaluation, Vol. 24, No. 4, pp. 228-238, 1993.