Suggestions for Statewide Measurement Systems: Pennsylvania's Experience

Topics in Early Childhood Special Education

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 34-48

  Campbell, Philippa H ^a   Anketell, Mary ^b  

^a THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Pennsylvania Training and Technical Assistance Network   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34547502680     PISSN: 02711214     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/02711214070270010301     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Bagnato, S.J., & Neisworth, J. (1999). Collaboration and teamwork in assessment for early intervention. Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 8, 347—363.
2. Barnett, D.W., Daly, E.J., Jones, K.M., & Lentz, E.F. (2004). Response to intervention: Empirically based special service decisions from single case designs of increasing and decreasing intensity. The Journal of Special Education, 38, 66—79.
3. Brigance, A.H. (1991). Brigance diagnostic inventory of early development—Revised. North Billerica, MA: Curriculum Associates.
4. Bzoch, K.R., League, R. L., & Brown, V.L. (2000). Receptive expressive emergent language scale (REEL-3). Bloomington, MN: Pearson Assessments.
5. Coleman, M.R., Buysse, V., Neitzel, J. (2006). Recognition and response: An early intervening system for young children at-risk for learning disabilities: Research synthesis and recommendations. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina, Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute.
6. Dunn, L.M., & Dunn, L.M. (1997). Technical manual for the Peabody vocabulary test (3rd ed.). Circle Pines, MN : American Guidance Service.
7. Dunn, W.W. (1999). The sensory profile. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corp.
8. Dunst, C.J., Bagnato, S.J., Gorman, E., & Trivette, C. (2004). Sources of information about eligibility determination definitions and practices. MILEMarkers, 1(5), 1—5.
9. Early Childhood Outcomes (ECO) Center, SRI International. (2004, April). Considerations related to developing a system for measuring outcomes for young children and their families. Retrieved May 15, 2006, from http://www.fpg.unc.edu/~eco/pdfs/considerations.pdf
10. Early Childhood Outcomes (ECO) Center, SRI International. (2006, April). Instructions for completing the child outcomes summary form, draft under development. Retrieved May 15, 2006, from http://www.fpg.unc.edu/~eco/outcomes.cfm
11. Folio, R., & Fewell, R. (1996). Peabody developmental motor scales. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
12. Fuchs, D., Mock, D., Morgan, P.L., & Young, C.L. (2003). Responsiveness-to-intervention: Definitions, evidence, and implications for the learning disabilities construct. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18, 157—171.
13. Fudala, J. (1999). Arizona articulation proficiency scale (3rd ed.). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
14. Furuno, S., O'Reilly, K.A., Hosaka, C.M., Inatsuka, T.T., Zeisloft-Falbey, B., & Allman, T. (1988). Hawaii early learning profile (HELP). Palo Alto, CA: Vort.
15. Glover, M.E., Preminger, J.L., & Sanford, A.R. (1988). Early LAP: The early learning accomplishment profile for young children: Birth to 36 months. Chapel Hill, NC : Chapel Hill Training-Outreach Project.
16. Goldman, R., & Fristoe, M. (2000). Goldman—Fristoe test of articulation (2nd ed.). Bloomington, MN: Pearson Assessments.
17. Harbin, G., Rous, B., & McLean, M. (2004, August). Issues in designing state accountability systems. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolinal, Frank Porter Graham Child Development Center.
18. Hebbeler, K. (2004, July). Uses and misuses of data on outcomes for young children with disabilities. Early Childhood Outcomes (ECO) Center. Retrieved May 15, 2006, from http://www.fpg.unc.edu/~eco/pdfs/ECO_Outcomes_Uses.pdf
19. Huberman, A.M., & Miles, M.B. (1994). Data management and analysis methods. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 428—444). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20. Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 1990, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq. (1990)
21. International Reading Association. (2004, December). Response to intervention in the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 2004. Retrieved May 21, 2005, from http://www.reading.org/downloads/resources/IDEA_RTI_report.pdf
22. Klotz, M.B., & Canter, A. (2006). Response to Intervention (RTI): A primer for parents (National Association of School Psychologists). Retrieved May 15, 2006, from http://www.nasponline.org/advocacy/rtiprimerparents.pdf
23. Linder, T. (1993). Transdisciplinary play-based assessment. Baltimore: Brookes.
24. Meisels, S. (2007). No easy answers: Accountability in early childhood. In R. C. Pianta, M. J. Cox, & K. Snow (Eds.), School readiness, early learning, and the transition to kindergarten. Baltimore: Brookes.
25. Meisels, S.J. (1996). Charting the continuum of assessment and intervention. In S. J. Meisels & E. Fenichel (Eds.), New visions for the developmental assessment of infants and young children (pp. 27— 52). Washington, DC: Zero to Three.
26. Meisels, S.J., & Atkins-Burnett, S. (2000). The elements of early childhood assessment. In J. Shonkoff & S. J. Meisels (Eds.), Handbook of early childhood intervention (2nd ed., pp. 231—257). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27. Meisels, S.J., & Fenichel, E. (1996). New visions for the developmental assessment of infants and young children. Washington, DC: Zero to Three.
28. Meisels, S.J., & Provenance, S. (1989). Screening and assessment: Guidelines for identifying young disabled and developmentally vulnerable children and their families. Washington, DC: National Center for Clinical Infant Programs.
29. National Association for the Education of Young Children & National Association of Early Childhood Specialists in State Departments of Education. (2003, November). Joint position statement: Early childhood curriculum, assessment, and program evaluation. Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
30. National Association of School Psychologists. (2005, July). NASP position statement on early childhood assessment. Retrieved May 15, 2006, from http://nasponline.org/information/pospaper_eca.html
31. National Early Childhood Technical Assistance Center. (2005, April). A framework for developing a child and family outcome system. Retrieved May 15, 2006, from http://www.nectas.unc.edu/topics/quality/childfam.asp
32. National Early Childhood Technical Assistance Center. (2006, June). Report from the National TA Meeting on Measuring Child and Family Outcomes, Albuquerque, April 25—27, 2006. Retrieved June 13, 2006, from http://nectac.org/~pdfs/meetings/outcomes2006
33. Neisworth, J.T., & Bagnato, S.J. (2004). The mismeasure of young children: The authentic assessment alternative. Infants and Young Children, 17, 198—212.
34. Neisworth, J.T., & Bagnato, S.J. (2005). Recommended practices in assessment. In S. Sandall, M. McLean, M. L. Hemmeter, & B. Smith (Eds.), DEC Recommended practices in early intervention/early childhood special education (2nd ed., pp. 17—27). Longmont, CO: Sopris.
35. Newborg, J., Stock, J.R., Wnek, L., Guidubaldi, J., & Svinicki, J. (1984). Battelle developmental inventory. Itasca, IL: Riverside.
36. Parish, D., & Philips, G. (2003, December). Developing an early childhood outcomes system for OSEP: Key considerations. Washington, DC: American Institutes for Research.
37. Roberts, R., Innocenti, M., & Goetze, L. (1999). By what outcomes should Part H be evaluated at the state level? Journal of Early Intervention, 22, 152—163.
38. Sanford, A.R., & Zelman, J.G. (1988). Learning accomplishment profile. Lewisville, NC: Kaplan.
39. SKI-HI Institute. (2006). SKI-HI model curriculum manual. Logan: Utah State University, Department of Communicative Disorders.
40. Sparrow, S.S., & Cicchetti, D.V. (2005). The Vineland adaptive behavior scales (2nd ed.). Circle Pines, MN: AGS Publishing.
41. Stillman, R. (1978). Callier-Azuza scale. Dallas : University of Texas at Dallas, Department of Communication Disorders.
42. Taylor-Powell, E., & Renner, M. (2003). Analyzing qualitative data. Madison: University of Wisconsin Extension, Cooperative Extension Publishing Operations.
43. Voress, J., & Maddox, T. (1996). Developmental assessment of young children (DAYC). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
44. Zimmerman, I.L., Steiner, V.G., & Pond, R.E. (1992). PLS-3: Preschool language scale—3. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corp.