Genuine tripartite entanglement semi-monotone for (2 × 2 × n)-dimentional systems

Quantum Information and Computation

Volumn 7, Issue 7, 2007, Pages 584-593

  Yu, Chang Shui ^a   Song, He Shan ^a   Wang, Ya Hong ^a,b  

^a DALIAN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^b DALIAN POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Entanglement; Entanglement measure; Tripartite entanglement

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

ANALYTIC APPROXIMATION; APPROXIMATION TECHNIQUES; ENTANGLEMENT; ENTANGLEMENT MEASURE; ENTANGLEMENT MONOTONES; KRONECKER PRODUCT; SEPARABLE STATE; TRIPARTITE ENTANGLEMENT;

QUANTUM ENTANGLEMENT;

EID: 34547502274     PISSN: 15337146     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000).
2. M. Zukowski, A. Zeilinger, M. A. Home, and A. K. Ekert, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 4287 (1993).
3. C. H. Bennett, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett.70,1895 (1993).
4. C. H. Bennett and S. Wiesner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 2881 (1992).
5. W. K. Wootters, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 2245 (1998).
6. A.Uhlmann, Phys. Rev. A 62, 032307 (2000).
7. K. Audenaert, F. Verstraete and De Moor, Phys. Rev. A 64, 052304 (2001).
8. Florian Mintert, Marek Kuś, and Andreas Buchleitner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 167902 (2004).
9. Valerie Coffman, Joydip Kundu, and William K. Wootters, Phys. Rev. A 61, 052306 (2000).
10. W. Dür, G. Vidal, and J. I. Cirac, Phys. Rev. A 62, 062314 (2000).
11. A. Miyake, Phys. Rev. A 67, 012108 (2003).
12. A. Miyake, F. Verstraete, Phys. Rev. A 69, 012101 (2004).
13. Andreas Osterloh, Jens Siewert, Phys. Rev. A 72, 012337 (2005).
14. Alexander Wong and Nelson Christensen, Phys. Rev. A 63, 044301 (2001).
15. Chang-shui Yu, He-shan Song, Phys. Rev. A 72, 022333 (2005).
16. Chang-shui Yu, He-shan Song, Phys. Rev. A 73, 032322 (2006).
17. A. R. R. Carvalho, F. Mintert, A. Buchleitner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 230501 (2004);
18. Chang-shui Yu, He-shan Song, Phys. Rev. A 73, 022325 (2006).
19. D. A. Meyer and N. R. Wallach, J. Math. Phys. 43, 4273 (2002).
20. G. K. Brennen, Quant. Inf. Comp. 3, 619 (2003).
21. G. Gour, D. A. Meyer, and B. C. Sanders, Phys. Rev. A 72, 042329 (2005).
22. G. Gour, Phys. Rev. A 72, 042318 (2005).
23. P. Rungta, V. Bužek, C. M. Caves, et al, Phy. Rev. A 64, 042315 (2001).
24. W. K. Wootters, Quantum Inf. Comp. 1, 27 (2001).
25. In fact, the entanglement of W states is a kind of genuine tripartite entanglement [10-12], however, τ(W) = 0 for (2 × 2 × 2) -dimensional cases. In this sense, the genuine tripartite entanglement mentioned in the paper means those with nonzero τ.
26. N. P. Pitsianis, Ph.D. thesis, Cornell University, New York, 1997.
27. C. F. Van Loan and N. P. Pitsianis, in Linear Algebra for Large Scale and Real Time Applications, edited by M. S. Moonen and G. H. Golub (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1993), pp. 293-314.
28. The procedure is the same to that in Ref. [15], hence omitted here. AU corresponding parameters are not given explicitly, because they are usually given by numerical processing.
29. Florian Mintert, André R. R. Carvalho, Marek Kuś, and Andreas Buchleitner, Physics Report 415, 207 (2005).