Monitoring students' collaboration in computer-mediated collaborative problem-solving: Applied feedback approaches

Journal of Educational Computing Research

Volumn 35, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 399-424

  Zumbach, Joerg ^a   Reimann, Peter ^b   Koch, Sabine C ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SALZBURG   (Austria)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34547492417     PISSN: 07356331     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2190/2G3G-5M86-8474-76NV     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Aronson, E. (1984). Förderung von Schulleistung, Selbstwert und prosozialem Verhalten: Die Jigsaw-Methode [Enhancement of performance in school, self value and pro social behavior: The Jigsaw method]. In G. L Huber, S. Rotering-Steinberg, & D. Wahl (Hrsg.). Kooperatives Lernen [Cooperative learning] (pp. 48-59). Weinheim: Beltz-Verlag.
2. Arrow, H., McGrath, J. E., & Berdahl, J. L. (2000). Small groups as complex systems. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
3. Barron, B., & Sears, D. (2002). Advancing understanding of learning in interaction: How ways of participating can influence joint performance and individual learning. In G. Stahl (Ed.), Computer support for collaborative learning: Foundations for a CSCL community (pp. 593-594). Hillsdale, NY: Erlbaum.
4. Barros, B., & Verdejo, M. F. (1999). An approach to analyse collaboration when shared structured workspaces are used for carrying out group learning processes. In S. P. Lajoie & M. Vivet (Eds.), Artificial intelligence in education: Open learning environments (pp. 449-456). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
5. Barros, B., & Verdejo, M. F. (2000). Analyzing student interaction processes in order to improve collaboration, The DEGREE approach. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 11, 221-241.
6. Buckingham Shum, S. (1997). Balancing formality with informality: User centered requirements for knowledge management technologies. AAAI Spring Symposium (Mar. 24-26, 1997), Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA: AAAI Press.
7. Conklin, E. J. (1993). Capturing organizational memory. In R. M. Baecker (Ed.). Groupware and computer-supported cooperative work (pp. 561-565). San Francisco: Morgan Kaufman.
8. Diehl, C., Ranney, M., & Schank, P. (2001). Model-based feedback supports reflective activity in collaborative argumentation. In. P. Dillenbourg, A. Eurelings, & K. Hakkarainen (Eds.), European perspectives on computer-supported collaborative learning (pp. 189-196), Netherlands: Universiteit Maastricht.
9. Dillenbourg, P. & Traum, D. (1996). Grounding in multi-modal task-oriented collaboration. Paper presented at the European Conference on AI in Education, Lisboa, Portugal.
10. Dillenbourg, P., & Traum, D. (2006). Sharing Solutions: Persistence and grounding in multimodal collaborative problem solving. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(1), 121-151.
11. Donath, J., Karahalios, K., & Vigas, F. (1999). Visualizing conversation. Journal of computer-mediated communication, 4(4), Online Version: http://jcmc.huji.ac.il/vol4/issue4/donath.html
12. Hannafin, M., Land, S. & Oliver, K. (1999). Open learning environments: Foundations, methods, and models. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models (pp. 115-140). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
13. Hermann, F., Rummel, N., & Spada, H. (2001). Solving the case together: The challenge of net-based interdisciplinary collaboration. In P. Dillenbourg, A. Eurelings, & K. Hakkarainen (Eds.), European perspectives on computer-supported collaborative learning. Proceedings of the European conference on computer-supported collaborative learning (pp. 293-300). Maastricht, NL: McLuhan Institute.
14. Jermann, P., Soller, A., & Lesgold, A. (2004) Computer software support for collaborative learning. In J.-W. Strijbos, P. Kirschner, & R. Martens (Eds.), What we know about CSCL in higher education (pp. 141-166). Amsterdam: Kluwer.
15. Kiesler, S., & Sproull, L. (1992). Group decision making and communication technology. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 52, 96-123.
16. Komis, V., Avouris, N., & Fidas, C. (2003). A study on heterogeneity during real time collaborative problem solving. In B. Wasson, S. Ludvigsen, & H.-U. Hoppe (Eds.), Designing for change in networked learning environments (pp. 411-420). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
17. Koschmann, T., Suthers, D., & Chan, T.-W. (Eds.). (2005). Computer supported collaborative learning 2005. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
18. Lancaster, C. J., Bradley, E., Smith, I. K., Chessman, A., Stroup-Benham, C. A., & Camp, M. G. (1997). The effect of PBL on students' perceptions of learning environment. Academic Medicine, 72(10, Suppl. 1), 10-12.
19. Marshall, R. E. (1978). Measuring the medical school learning environment. Journal of Medical Education, 53, 98-104.
20. McGrath, J. E. (1991). Time, interaction, and performance (TIP). A theory of groups. Small Group Research, 22(2), 147-174.
21. McGrath, J. E., & Hollingshead, A. B. (1994). Groups interacting with technology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22. Muehlenbrock, M. (2001). Action-based collaboration analysis for group learning. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
23. Muehlenbrock, M., & Hoppe, U. (1999). Computer supported interaction analysis of group problem solving. In C. Hoadley & J. Roschelle (Eds.), Proceedings of the conference on computer supported collaborative learning (CSCL-99) (pp. 398-405). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
24. Muehlenbrock, M., Tewissen, F., & Hoppe, H. U. (1998). A framework system for intelligent support in open distributed learning environments. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 9, 256-274.
25. Palinscar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117-175.
26. Pfister, R., & Mühlpfordt, M. (2002). Supporting discourse in a synchronous learning environment: The learning protocol approach. In G. Stahl (Ed.), Computer support for collaborative learning: Foundations for a CSCL community (pp. 581-582). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
27. Reimann, P. (2003). How to support groups in learning: More than problem solving. In V. Aleven et al. (Ed.), Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED 2003): Supplementary Proceedings (pp. 3-16). Sydney: University of Sydney.
28. Reiser, B. (2002). Why scaffolding should sometimes makes tasks more difficult for learners. In G. Stahl (Ed.), Computer support for collaborative learning: Foundations for a CSCL community (pp. 255-264). Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.
29. Reiserer, M., Ertl, B., & Mandl, H. (2002). Fostering collaborative knowledge construction in desktop videconferencing: Effects of content schemes and cooperation scripts in peer-teaching settings. In G. Stahl (Ed.), Computer support for collaborative learning: Foundations for a CSCL community (pp. 379-388). Boulder, CO: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
30. Rummel, N., Spada, H., Hermann, F., Caspar, F., & Schornstein, K. (2002). Promoting the coordination of computer-mediated interdisciplinary collaboration. In G. Stahl (Ed.), Computer support for collaborative learning: Foundations for a CSCL community (pp. 558-560). Hillsdale, NY: Erlbaum.
31. Sadler, P. M., Coyle, H. P., & Schwarz, M. (2000). Engineering competitions in the middle school classroom.: Key elements in developing effective design challenges. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9(3), 299-327.
32. Salmon, G. (2000). E-moderating. London: Kogan Page.
33. Soller, A., Jermann, P., Muehlenbrock, M., & Mones, A. M. (2003). From mirroring to guiding: A review of the state of the art technology for supporting collaborative learning. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 2, 40-62.
34. Soller, A., & Lesgold, A. (1999). Analyzing peer dialogue from an active learning perspective [Internet]. Retrieved October 30, 2004, from: http://sra.itc.it/people/soller/documents/Soller-Lesgold-AI-ED-Workshop.pdf
35. Soller, A., & Lesgold, A. (2000). Knowledge acquisition for adaptive collaborative learning environments. In American Association for Artificial Intelligence, Proceedings of the AAAI fall symposium: Learning how to do things (pp. 57-64). Cambridge: MIT Press.
36. Suthers, D. (2001). Towards a systematic study of representational guidance for collaborative learning discourse. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 7(3). Electronic publication http://www.jucs.org/jucs_7_3/ towards_a_systematic_study
37. Zumbach, J., Hillers, A., & Reimann, P. (2003). Supporting distributed problem-based learning: The use of feedback in online learning. In T. Roberts (Ed.), Online collaborative learning: Theory and practice (pp. 86-103). Hershey, PA: Idea.
38. Zumbach, J. & Reimann, P. (1999). Combining computer supported collaborative argumentation and problem-based learning: An approach for designing online learning environments. Workshop Computer Supported Collaborative Argumentation at the CSCL99 conference December 10th to 16th in Stanford, CA.
39. Zumbach, J., & Reimann, P. (2002). Enhancing learning from hypertext by inducing a goal orientation: comparing different approaches. Instructional Science, 30, 243-267.
40. Zumbach, J., & Reimann, P. (2003). Influence of feedback on distributed problem based learning. In B. Wasson, S. Ludvigsen, & H.-U. Hoppe (Eds.), Designing for change in networked learning environments (pp. 219-228). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
41. Zumbach, J., Schönemann, J., & Reimann, P. (2005). Analyzing and supporting collaboration in cooperative computer-mediated communication. In T. Koschmann, D. Suthers, & T. W. Chan (Eds.), Computer supported collaborative learning 2005: The next 10 years! (pp. 758-767). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.