Charge form factors and nucleon shape

AIP Conference Proceedings

Volumn 904, Issue , 2007, Pages 110-125

  Buchmann, A J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Electroexcitation of nucleon resonances; Nucleon intrinsic quadrupole form factor; Spin flavor symmetry

Indexed keywords

EID: 34547488395     PISSN: 0094243X     EISSN: 15517616     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1063/1.2734297     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (79)

1. E. E. Chambers and R. Hofstadter, Phys. Rev. 103, 1454 (1956).
2. G. G. Simon, F. Borkowski, Ch. Schmitt and V. H. Walther, Z. Naturf. 35a, 1 (1980).
3. J.J. Kelly, Phys. Rev. C 66, 065203 (2002).
4. J. Friedrich and Th. Walcher, Eur. Phys. J. A17 607, (2003); hep-ph/0303054.
5. F. Halzen and A. D. Martin, Quarks and Leptons, Wiley, New York, 1984.
6. 2) in order to emphasize the parallels between elastic and inelastic charge form factors.
7. f) are the electron energy and three-momentum in the initial and final states.
8. N2)/(1 + τ). The extraction of the charge form factor becomes increasingly more inaccurate at higher momentum transfers because of its suppression by the factor τ.
9. G. Dillon and G. Morpurgo, Phys. Lett. B459, 321 (1999).
10. M. K. Jones, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 1398 (2000);
11. O. Gayou, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 092301 (2002).
12. The different results for the nucleon form factors obtained from both types of experiment can to some extent be understood in terms of two-photon exchange contributions, which affect the extraction of the form factors from the unpolarized cross section whereas the recoil polarization measurements are less sensitive to these corrections [12].
13. P A. M. Guichon and M. Vanderhaeghen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 142303 (2003).
14. J. Arrington, Phys. Rev. C 68, 034325 (2003).
15. H.F. Jones and M.D. Scadron, Ann. Phys. 81, 1 (1973);
16. R.C.E. Devenish, T.S. Eisenshitz, and J. Körner, Phys. Rev. D 14, 3063 (1976);
17. M.M. Giannini, Rep. Progr. Phys. 54 (1990) 453;
18. M. Warns, H. Schröder, W. Pfeil, and H. Rollnik, Z. Phys. C 45, 627 (1990).
19. C. E. Carlson, Phys. Rev. D34, 2704 (1986).
20. T. DeForest, Jr. and J. D. Walecka, Adv. Phys. 15, 1 (1966).
21. A.M. Bernstein, Eur. Phys. J. A 17, 349 (2003);
22. C. Mertz et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 2963 (2001);
23. C.N. Papanicolas, Eur. Phys. J. A 18, 141 (2003);
24. C.N. Papanicolas, Workshop on Electron Nucleus Scattering, Marciana Marina, Italy, 1988, World Scientific, 1989, pg. 41-61.
25. A.J. Buchmann, E. Hernández, A. Faessler, Phys. Rev. C 55, 448 (1997).
26. L.D. van Buuren et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 012001 (2002).
27. K. Joo et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 122001 (2002).
28. P Bartsch et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 142001 (2002);
29. Th. Pospischil et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 2959 (2001).
30. S. Stave et al., Eur. Phys. J. A 30, 471 (2006); nucl-ex/0604013
31. D. Elsner et al., Eur. Phys. J. A 27, 91 (2006).
32. N. F Sparveris et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 022003 (2005).
33. M. Ungaro et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 112003 (2006).
34. A. Idilbi, X. Ji, J.P. Ma, Phys. Rev. D 69, 014006 (2004).
35. L. Tiator, D. Drechsel, S.S. Kamalov, and S.N. Yang, Eur. Phys. J. A 17, 357 (2003).
36. E. Jenkins, X. Ji, and A. V. Manohar, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 242001 (2002).
37. C. Alexandrou, Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. 128, 1 (2004), arXiv:nucl-th/0311007.
38. A.J. Buchmann, J.A. Hester, and R.F. Lebed, Phys. Rev. D 66, 056002 (2002).
39. F. Gross and P. Agbakpe, Phys. Rev. C 73, 015203 (2006).
40. V. Pascalutsa, M. Vanderhaeghen, S.N. Yang, Phys. Rep. 437, 125 (2007); hep-ph/0609004
41. A.J. Buchmann and E.M. Henley, Phys. Rev. C 63, 015202 (2001);
42. Phys. Rev. D 65, 073017 (2002).
43. A. J. Buchmann, Can. J. Phys. 83,455 (2005).
44. M. Gell-Mann and Y. Ne'eman, The Eightfold Way, W. A. Benjamin, New York 1964.
45. F Gürsey and L.A. Radicati, Phys. Rev. Lett. 13, 173 (1964).
46. B. Sakita, Phys. Rev. Lett. 13, 643 (1964).
47. M.A.B. Beg, B.W. Lee, and A. Pais, Phys. Rev. Lett. 13, 514 (1964).
48. J.-L. Gervais and B. Sakita, Phys. Rev. D 30, 1795, (1984).
49. R.F. Dashen, E. Jenkins, and A.V. Manohar, Phys. Rev. D 51, 3697 (1995).
50. R.F. Lebed, Czech. J. Phys. 49, 1273 (1999); nucl-th/9810080. This paper contains a pedagogical introduction to this method.
51. R.F. Lebed, Phys. Rev. D 51, 5039 (1995).
52. A.J. Buchmann, Nucl. Phys. A 670, 174c (2000); hep-ph/0208045; hep-ph/0207368; hep-ph/0301031.
53. G. Dillon and G. Morpurgo, hep-ph/0011202
54. R.F. Lebed and D.R. Martin, Phys.Rev. D 70, 016008 (2004).
55. G. Blanpied et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 4337 (1997);
56. Phys. Rev. C 64 025203 (2001).
57. 2].
58. A.J. Buchmann, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 212301 (2004).
59. 2) is that they correspond to the familiar electromagnetic multipole moments in the Q → 0 limit.
60. Δ) = 258 MeV
61. R. Beck et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 606 (1997).
62. R. Gothe, Proceedings of NSTAR 2000, Newport News, World Scientific, 2001, eds. V. Burkert et al., pg. 31.
63. R. Siddle et al., Nucl. Phys. B 35, 93 (1971)
64. V.V. Frolov et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 45 (1998). In this paper the C2/M1 ratio is extracted from the cross section using two methods: (i) a multipole fit to the pion angular distributions, (ii) a Lagrangian model. I take the results of method (i), which uses fewer assumptions. In this context see also [56].
65. J.C. Alder et al., Nucl. Phys. B 46, 573 (1972).
66. J. J. Kelly, Phys. Rev. C 72, 048201 (2005);
67. Phys. Rev. C 72, 059901(E) (2005).
68. S. Galster et al., Nucl. Phys. B 32, 221 (1971).
69. 2 = 0, Siegert's theorem is very well satisfied [59].
70. A.J. Buchmann, E. Hernández, U. Meyer, A. Faessler, Phys. Rev. C 58, 2478 (1998).
71. A.J. Buchmann, E. Hernández, and K. Yazaki, Phys. Lett. B269, 35 (1991);
72. Nucl. Phys. A 569, 661 (1994).
73. 2. The mass relation is experimentally well satisfied.
74. M. A. Beg and V. Singh, Phys. Rev. Lett. 13, 418 (1964).
75. A. Bohr and B. Mottelson, Nuclear Structure II, Benjamin, Reading, MA, 1975.
76. E. M. Henley and W. Thirring, Elementary Quantum Field Theory, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1962.
77. p.
78. G. E. Brown, Nucl. Phys. A 358, 39c (1981);
79. V. Vento, G. Baym, and A. D. Jackson, Phys. Lett. 102B, 97 (1981).