Defining nasal cartilage elasticity: Biomechanical testing of the tripod theory based on a cantilevered model

Archives of Facial Plastic Surgery

Volumn 9, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 264-270

  Westreich, Richard W ^a,b   Courtland, Hayden William ^c   Nasser, Philip ^c   Jepsen, Karl ^c   Lawson, William ^c  

^a SUNY DOWNSTATE MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b LONG ISLAND COLLEGE HOSPITAL   (United States)

^c MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIOMECHANICS; CARTILAGE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; ELASTICITY; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; NOSE; NOSE RECONSTRUCTION; PHYSIOLOGY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; TRANSPLANTATION;

BIOMECHANICS; CARTILAGE; ELASTICITY; HUMANS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; NOSE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RHINOPLASTY; SOFTWARE; TISSUE AND ORGAN HARVESTING;

EID: 34547484003     PISSN: 15212491     EISSN: 15383660     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/archfaci.9.4.264     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Anderson JR. A reasoned approach to nasal base surgery. Arch Otolaryngol. 1984;110(6):349-358.
2. Janeke JB, Wright WK. Studies on the support of the nasal tip. Arch Otolaryngol. 1971;93(5):458-464.
3. Adams WP, Rohrich R, Jollier L, et al. Anatomic basis and clinical implications for nasal tip support in open versus closed rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999;103(1):255-261.
4. Gassner HG, Remington WJ, Sherris DA. Quantitative study of nasal tip support and the effect of reconstructive rhinoplasty. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2001;3(3):178-184.
5. Beaty MM, Dyer WK, Shawl M. The quantification of surgical changes in nasal tip support. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2002;4(2):82-91.
6. McCollough EG, Mangat D. Systematic approach to correction of the nasal tip in rhinoplasty. Arch Otolaryngol. 1981;107(1):12-16.
7. Daniel RK, Letourneau A. Rhinoplasty: nasal anatomy. Ann Plast Surg. 1988;20(1):5-13.
8. Kridel RW, Konior RJ, Shumrick KA, Wright WK. Advances in nasal tip surgery: the lateral crural steal. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1989;115(10):1206-1212.
9. Han SK, Lee D, Kim J, et al. An anatomic study of the nasal tip supporting structures. Ann Plast Surg. 2004;52(2):134-139.
10. Porter JP, Olson KL. Analysis of the African American female nose. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;111(2):620-626.
11. Nolst Trenité GJ. Considerations in ethnic rhinoplasty. Facial Plast Surg. 2003;19(3):239-245.
12. Palma P, Bignami M, Delu G, et al. Rhinoplasty for the Mediterranean nose. Facial Plast Surg. 2003;19(3):279-294.
13. Daniel RK. Hispanic rhinoplasty in the United States, with emphasis on the Mexican American nose. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;112(1):244-256.
14. Baker HL. Anatomical and profile analysis of the female black American nose. J Natl Med Assoc. 1989;81(11);1169-1175.
15. Adamson PA, Litner JA, Dahiya R. The M-Arch model: a new concept of nasal tip dynamics. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2006;8(1):16-25.
16. Gruber R. Anatomic basis and clinical implications for nasal tip support in open versus closed rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999;103:262-264.
17. Richmon JD, Sage AB, Wong VW, et al. Tensile biomechanical properties of human nasal septal cartilage. Am J Rhinol. 2005:19(6):617-622.
18. Park SS, Jin H, Chi DH, et al. Characteristics of tissue-engineered cartilage from human auricular chondrocytes. Biomaterials. 2004;25(12):2363-2369.
19. Murakami WT, Wong LW, Davidson TM. Applications of the biomechanical behavior of cartilage to nasal septoplastic surgery. Laryngoscope. 1982;92(3):300-309.
20. Roy R, Kohles S, Zaporojan V. Analysis of bending behavior of native and engineered auricular and costal cartilage. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2004:68(4):597-602.
21. Milgrim LM, Lawson W, Cohen AF. Anthropometric analysis of the female Latino nose: revised aesthetic concepts and their surgical implications. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1996;122(10):1079-1086.
22. Homicz MR, McGowan KB, Lottman LM, et al. A compositional analysis of human nasal septal cartilage. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2003;5(1):53-58.