Breast-Conservative Surgery With Close or Positive Margins: Can the Breast Be Preserved With High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy Boost?

International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics

Volumn 68, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 1381-1387

  Guinot, Jose Luis ^a   Roldan, Susana ^a   Maroñas, María ^a   Tortajada, Isabel ^a   Carrascosa, Maria ^a   Chust, Maria Luisa ^a   Estornell, Marian ^a   Mengual, Jose Luis ^a   Arribas, Leoncio ^a  

^a INSTITUTO VALENCIANO DE ONCOLOGÍA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Brachytherapy; Breast cancer; Close margin; High dose rate; Positive margin

Indexed keywords

DOSIMETRY; RADIOTHERAPY; SAMPLING; SURGERY; TUMORS;

BRACHYTHERAPY; BREAST CANCER; CLOSE MARGIN; HIGH DOSE RATE; POSITIVE MARGIN;

ONCOLOGY;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BRACHYTHERAPY; BREAST CARCINOMA; BREAST FIBROSIS; BREAST SURGERY; CANCER RECURRENCE; CANCER RISK; CANCER SURVIVAL; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SURVIVAL RATE; TREATMENT FAILURE;

ADULT; AGE FACTORS; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BRACHYTHERAPY; BREAST; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CARCINOMA, DUCTAL, BREAST; COMBINED MODALITY THERAPY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MASTECTOMY, SEGMENTAL; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM, RESIDUAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SURVIVAL RATE;

EID: 34547479801     PISSN: 03603016     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.01.055     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Fisher B., Anderson S., Bryant J., et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med 347 (2002) 1233-1241
2. Veronesi U., Cascinelli N., Mariani L., et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer. N Engl J Med 347 (2002) 1227-1232
3. Van Dongen J.A., Voogd A.C., Fentiman I.S., et al. Long-term results of a randomized trial comparing breast-conserving therapy with mastectomy: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer 10801 trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 92 (2000) 1143-1150
4. Perez C.A., Taylor M.E., Halverson K., et al. Brachytherapy or electron beam boost in conservation therapy of carcinoma of the breast: A nonrandomized comparison. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 34 (1996) 995-1007
5. Frazier R.C., Kestin L.L., Kini V., et al. Impact of boost technique on outcome in early-stage cancer patients treated with breast-conserving therapy. Am J Clin Oncol 24 (2001) 26-32
6. Moreno F., Guedea F., López Y., et al. External beam irradiation plus (192) Ir implant after breast-preserving surgery in women with early breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 48 (2000) 757-765
7. Hammer J., Seewald D., Christine M.D., et al. Breast cancer: Primary treatment with external-beam radiation therapy and high-dose-rate iridium implantation. Radiology 193 (1994) 573-577
8. Hennequin C., Durdux C., Espié M., et al. High-dose-rate brachytherapy for early breast cancer: An ambulatory technique. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 45 (1999) 85-90
9. Beato I., Guinot J.L., Arribas L., et al. Sobreimpresión en fracción única con braquiterapia intersticial de alta tasa en el tratamiento conservador del carcinoma de mama. Clin Transl Oncol 07 (2005) 404-408
10. Leong C., Boyages J., Jayasinghe U.W., et al. Effect of margins on ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence after breast conservation therapy for lymph node-negative breast carcinoma. Cancer 100 (2004) 1823-1832
11. Cowen D., Houvenaeghel G., Bardou V., et al. Local and distant failures after limited surgery with positive margins and radiotherapy for node-negative breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 47 (2000) 305-312
12. Smitt M.C., Nowels K.W., Zdeblilck M.J., et al. The importance of the lumpectomy surgical margin status in long-term results of breast conservation. Cancer 76 (1995) 259-267
13. Peterson M.E., Schultz D.J., Reynolds C., et al. Outcomes in breast cancer patients relative to margin status after treatment with breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy: The University of Pennsylvania experience. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 43 (1999) 1029-1035
14. Obedian E., and Haffty B.G. Negative margin status improves local control in conservatively managed breast cancer patients. Cancer J Sci Am 6 (2000) 28-33
15. Dillon M.F., Hill A.D., Quinn C.M., et al. A pathologic assessment of adequate margin status in breast-conserving therapy. Ann Surg Oncol 13 (2006) 333-339
16. Karasawa K., Mitsumori M., Yamauchi C., et al. Treatment outcome of breast-conserving therapy in patients with positive or close resection margins: Japanese multi institute survey for radiation dose effect. Breast Cancer 12 (2005) 91-98
17. Kunos C., Latson L., Overmoyer B., et al. Breast conservation surgery achieving > or = 2 mm tumor-free margins results in decreased local-regional recurrence rates. Breast J 12 (2006) 28-36
18. Wazer D.E., Schmidt-Ullrich R.K., Schmid C.H., et al. The value of breast lumpectomy margin assessment as a predictor of residual tumor burden. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 38 (1997) 291-299
19. Wazer D.E., Jabro G., Ruthazer R., et al. Extent of margin positivity as a predictor for local recurrence after breast conserving irradiation. Radiat Oncol Investig 7 (1999) 111-117
20. Vicini F.A., Goldstein N.S., Pass H., et al. Use of pathologic factors to assist in establishing adequacy of excision before radiotherapy in patients treated with breast-conserving therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 60 (2004) 86-94
21. Park C.C., Mitsumori M., Nixon A., et al. Outcome at 8 years after breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy for invasive breast cancer: Influence of margin status and systemic therapy on local recurrence. J Clin Oncol 18 (2000) 1668-1675
22. Schnitt S.J., Abner A., Gelman R., et al. The relationship between microscopic margins of resection and the risk of local recurrence in patients with breast cancer treated with breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy. Cancer 74 (1994) 1746-1751
23. Gage I., Schnitt S.J., Nixon A.J., et al. Pathologic margin involvement and the risk of recurrence in patients treated with breast-conserving therapy. Cancer 78 (1996) 1921-1928
24. DiBiase S.J., Komarnicky L.T., and Schwartz G.F. The number of positive margins influences the outcome of women treated with breast preservation for early stage breast carcinoma. Cancer 82 (1998) 2212-2220
25. Taghian A., Mohiuddin M., Jagsi R., et al. Current perceptions regarding surgical margin status after breast-conserving therapy: Results of a survey. Ann Surg 241 (2005) 629-639
26. Dooley W.C., and Parker J. Understanding the mechanisms creating false positive lumpectomy margins. Am J Surg 190 (2005) 606-608
27. Gibson G.R., Lesnikoski B.A., Yoo J., et al. A comparison of ink-directed and traditional whole-cavity re-excision for breast lumpectomy specimens with positive margins. Ann Surg Oncol 8 (2001) 693-704
28. Camp E.R., McAuliffe P.F., Gilroy J.S., et al. Minimizing local recurrence after breast conserving therapy using intraoperative shaved margins to determine pathologic tumor clearance. J Am Coll Surg 201 (2005) 855-861
29. Cao D., Lin C., Woo S.H., et al. Separate cavity margin sampling at the time of initial breast lumpectomy significantly reduces the need for reexcisions. Am J Surg Pathol 29 (2005) 1625-1632
30. Solin L.J., Fowble B.L., Schultz D.J., et al. The significance of the pathology margins of the tumor excision on the outcome of patients treated with definitive irradiation for early stage breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 21 (1991) 279-287
31. DiBiase S.J., Komarnicky L.T., Heron D.E., et al. Influence of radiation dose on positive surgical margins in women undergoing breast conservation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 53 (2002) 680-686
32. Freedman G., Fowble B., Hanlon A., et al. Patients with early stage invasive cancer with close or positive margins treated with conservative surgery and radiation have an increased risk of breast recurrence that is delayed by adjuvant systemic therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 44 (1999) 1005-1015
33. Wazer D.E., Schmidt-Ullrich R.K., Ruthazer R., et al. Factors determining outcome for breast-conserving irradiation with margin-directed dose escalation to the tumor bed. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 40 (1998) 851-858
34. Neuschatz A.C., DiPetrillo T., Safaii H., et al. Long-term follow-up of a prospective policy of margin-directed radiation dose escalation in breast-conserving therapy. Cancer 97 (2003) 30-39
35. Manning M.A., Arthur D.W., Schmidt-Ullrich R.K., et al. Interstitial high-dose-rate brachytherapy boost: The feasibility and cosmetic outcome of a fractionated outpatient delivery scheme. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 48 (2000) 1301-1306
36. Miragall E., Guinot J.L., Arribas L., et al. Long term results in positive margin conservative breast cancer treatment with brachytherapy (2000) Presented at the 10th International Brachytherapy Conference; November 11-14; Madrid, Spain
37. Wazer D.E., Schmidt-Ullrich R.K., Ruthazer R., et al. The influence of age and extensive intraductal component histology upon breast lumpectomy margin assessment as a predictor of residual tumor. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 45 (1999) 885-891
38. Freedman G.M., Hanlon A.L., Fowble B.L., et al. Recursive partitioning identifies patients at high and low risk for ipsilateral tumor recurrence after breast-conserving surgery and radiation. J Clin Oncol 20 (2002) 4015-4021
39. Jobsen J.J., van der Palen J., Ong F., et al. The value of a positive margin for invasive carcinoma in breast-conservative treatment in relation to local recurrence is limited to young women only. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 57 (2003) 724-731
40. Anscher M.S., Jones P., Prosnitz L.R., et al. Local failure and margin status in early-stage breast carcinoma treated with conservation surgery and radiation therapy. Ann Surg 218 (1993) 22-28